2011.06.08 TRIAL Day Thirteen (Afternoon Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
JB asks witness whether investigators informed him that head injuries, m. artery, ruptured spleen, hand-to-hand combat, internal bleeding, etc. had anything to do with this. Witness answers no to each.
 
Why doesn't JB just ask, "So you cannot prove who did these searches on the computer, can you?"
 
I'm ASTOUNDED that JB would dare to even attempt to call someone out about advertising information on their business website.

That's comical! I can't believe he's doing that with a straight face!

LOL, JB may have gold crested business cards (that I'm not sure he ever paid for), but after, what, almost 3 years, the hyperlinks on his website still don't link to anything, LOL.
 
I understand that she looked up "chloroform" and how to make it, but I never thought of chloroform as a death-inducing agent...I only know about it as something they used to use during labor, to help women get through it. So as an untrained person and one not in tune with this entire case, I am guessing she wanted to use and did use it, to get Caylee out of her way at times, but I am not seeing it as a pre-selected murder weapon. Does that make any sense?

If your scenario is correct, Casey qualifies for the DP. Chloroforming a toddler would be considered child abuse that resulted in death.

Then there is the duct tape that needs to be explained.

IMO
 
There's too many chloroform being mentioned for it all to be a coincidence. By now, hopefully the jury can see a pattern in her behaviour leading up and after the crime.
 
Chloroform is a very dangerous substance. Hence why it is no longer used in the medical field and next to impossible to obtain through legal means.

You can get it easily from lab supply companies. It's used in DNA extraction (among a lot of other things) in labs to this day.
 
121u0wo.jpg

Thanks for the pic. Wonder why she looks so worried and nervous. ;)
 
It has not been used for general anesthesia in many decades, the risk of death was too high. There is NO legitimate use for this substance - sedating a child to get her 'out of the way' would be a crime regardless of the drug used.

I know it would be a crime and I do think she killed Caylee. I am not positive she intended to it by this method, that is all I am saying.
 
I understand that she looked up "chloroform" and how to make it, but I never thought of chloroform as a death-inducing agent...I only know about it as something they used to use during labor, to help women get through it. So as an untrained person and one not in tune with this entire case, I am guessing she wanted to use and did use it, to get Caylee out of her way at times, but I am not seeing it as a pre-selected murder weapon. Does that make any sense?

Yes. For me chloroform brings to mind movies and murderers or kidnappers knocking people out. I wonder if she planned to make it look like Zanny chloroformed and duct taped Caylee and she accidentally died.
 
HEAD INJURIES????

She was sleuthing accident scenarios.


I think that's what that silent video of Caylee in the highchair was all about. Maybe KC was looking at the mechanics of the chair to see if there was way Caylee could fall from the highchair & maybe hit head hard enough to kill her & still look like accident. MOO
 
Did the missing children's website searches come up yet?
 
Need someone to testify the Anthony's had a printer.

Edit: Didn't Firefox 2 have tabs? There would be way to know if a new tab had been open, leaving the old page up.
 
JB asks witness whether investigators informed him that head injuries, m. artery, ruptured spleen, hand-to-hand combat, internal bleeding, etc. had anything to do with this. Witness answers no to each.

Yup but did he ask about inhalation?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
154
Guests online
586
Total visitors
740

Forum statistics

Threads
625,652
Messages
18,507,646
Members
240,828
Latest member
The Flamazing Finder
Back
Top