2011.06.08 TRIAL Day Thirteen (Afternoon Session)

[fifteen89]

This guys voice is kinda sing-song-y. Could be putting jurors to sleep.

 

[momshrink]

Drone...cookies...computer generated....user interaction....drone

I need a bombshell soon. Just saying.

I'll ask NG to call you.

 

[Celt1997]

Okay, a new day. Let's hope for better things. Here's the chloroform recipe?

 

[luckyme]

The c word again!!!

 

[MissJames]

I agree with some of the other posters, that being that she could have been link hopping. I do it all the time and on some pretty weird stuff. But for someone sitting in a court of law on trial for murder, even link hopping on these subjects looks really, really ominous.

And what we saw of LDB and JA at hearings was awesome,so I have to believe there is a reason for bringing this in and doing it the way they are.

 

[Amster]

Actually, for those actually paying attention, this testimony is very interesting.

 

[Mountain_Kat]

march 21 user generated activity (perhaps a bookmark): chemistry, chloroorm

NOT AUTOGENERATED.

 

[GreenTeam]

chemistry/chloroform

 

[legalmania]

So basically, the State does not have evidence of her on a chloroform recipe page.

They have lost this case, imo.

I agree they need to prove a lot more before they get my vote. They haven't put only Casey behind that computer it was the family computer.

 

[Eye Wonder]

For MySpace and Facebook wouldnt it say the users id/email?

 

[nosytrish]

if she was searching these things or even just clicking on them because they seemed of interest to her (head injuries, ruptered spleen, etc.) we have to keep in mind that this is back in March 2008. So she researched fake injuries for the fake Zenaida to have received in a fake auto accident in June/July 2008??

 

[Mendara]

We still have not heard the shovel search or the recipe page for chloroform.

 

[HotButteredGrits]

They need to wrap up with this guy. Sounds like most of the jury has lost interest.

 

[momtective]

In theory, but remember Wiki is a user-kept & updated database. What we see now could be vastly different from 3 years ago. Remember how quickly people updated & removed stuff from Dr. Vass's page?

But did she go to wiki.com or to wikipedia.org? They are different. I thought I heard wiki.com

 

[GreenTeam]

"how to make chloraform" and then "how to make chloroform"

 

[SeaNymph]

There ya go...bet everyone's ears perked up!

 

[Intermezzo]

The jury is paying attention. Note-takers included 3, 5, 9, 10, 11. And occasionally, 1 and 8.
by stevehelling via twitter at 3:36 PM

"How to make chloraform" was searched. Please note I know it's spelled incorrectly. That's how someone searched it on 3/21/08 #CaseyAnthony
by cfnews13casey via twitter at 3:36 PM

 

[JustMeDeb]

This is the most I have seen ICA pay attention. Wonder if she is running back through her mind what she looked up on the computer and thinking...uh oh

 

[eaglemom]

how to make cholraform (google request)
how to make chloroform (did you mean)
searches

 

[Nali87]

Originally Posted by Chablis
So basically, the State does not have evidence of her on a chloroform recipe page.

They have lost this case, imo.

Why? She could've purchased it. I do not think the jury will disregard testimony of 40 witnesses and 100+ evidence presented because a recipe page was not found.