2011.06.14 TRIAL Day Eighteen (Afternoon Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well LA has hair that is approximately less than one inch long. Good luck trying to test that.
 
Did I miss something? Is great grandma deceased? Maybe they put her in the trunk of ICA's car to get her to the funeral service?

Maybe SA is calling Shirley to prove she's still alive! Mrs. Plesea, have you ever died?
 
What's he getting at? The Q12 sample had the banding. LA, CA, etc...are all alive. The only one that is dead, is poor Caylee.
 
So why is JB trying to hammer home this point that LA used to own the car? He's not going to figure into their theory, is he? Seems like pure innuendo for the purpose of creating doubt, in a slimy way.
 
Juror #2 sits and watches, never ever taking notes. Haven't seen him write anything for weeks.

by stevehelling via twitter at 12:25 PM
 
..... proficiency test.... contamination...... insulting FBI experts..... condescending attitude..... objections sustained....... sneaking in misleading questions......

Obviously Baez is cross examining.
 
Are you serious? This is pretty damaging stuff... She is linking the hair in the trunk to the hair at the scene...
What did you expect?

Yes, I was serious. I don't know what I was expecting honestly. The linking the hairs to both scenes was lost on me. I'm glad I'm not a juror. Maybe trying to read here and watch at the same time is too much for me to process. lol
 
I do think this is important testimony, but not critical after everything that has already been established by other witnesses. However, because she is currently in a management role at the FBI (with Quality Control) and Baez insinuated problems with evidence handling and chain of evidence yesterday, maybe this witness allows the state to further try to connect the hair in the car and at the scene, along with reinforcing the credibility of FBI processes and quality. JMO..
 
Anyone else notice how SUBMISSIVE JB sounds to His Honor today? MM MM MMM

Yeah that might have to do with how much they pissed off the judge yesterday. HHJP made a comment at sidebar that the DT can't be trusted (or words to that affect)
 
CT is a quality control officer.

JB questioning her regarding that. JA objecting, HHJBP - Sustained.

Q12.1 there is no indication, or you werent given info as to its history? correct?

CT - no incorrect i do get a history on the evidence.

The history of the case info that you receive is gratuatous info regarding the case and the evidence?

No i do dont think that is true. but i dont use that info base my findings.

But you do read the history?

yes

did that history include the fact that LA once owned the pontiac before ICA did?

objection, sustained.

JB asking something i dont understand

JA objecting because question is vague

Objection overruled

JB - were you given any information about any of the people who could not have been excluded as possible relatives?

CT - Not sure what you mean by information.
 

Catherine Theisen - FBI - oversees all quality control @ FBI -
cross from JB....

develop rules - general procedures and each unit supervisor has discretion as to how procedures in their unit.....all case work is subjected to minimum of 2 levels of review...each person who handles and processes evidence is required to pass proficiency tests .....put in place to prevent contamination? (object- sustained)
everything @ Lab is in accordance with accredation? (object- sustaine)
integrity of evidence is....(object-sustain)

General mitochondrial dna - Q-12.1 item - info re: history....communications into lab about the case in general in conducting case work.....aware LA owned Pontiac Sunfire previously (object-sustaine)
use this info to carry out your work? no! gratuitous info to read? no....incoming letters of communication it is a requirement to attach that but it doesn't influence casework....LA owned car before kc? (object-sustained)
any further info about CA (object-overrule) or others who can't be excluded on the maternal line other relatives....info may have included in the letters....don't have any recall of LA in the letters...

witness excused



 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
1,005
Total visitors
1,127

Forum statistics

Threads
626,172
Messages
18,521,777
Members
240,952
Latest member
Sherlock's Ghost
Back
Top