2011.07.18 HLN & FOX News Coverage - Caylee Anthony

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks, News Junkie!!! She sure said it all there...poor little Caylee.
 
JB will want ICA on a big network. It doesn't seem like they are banging down the doors as of yet. Not sure he will get a million from them either. Maybe 500k.

Interesting that he is making calls versus receiving them in regards to pics. While I think they are fielding offers I get the feeling there aren't as many or of the calibre they expected.

JB won't do Al IV because he wants lie detector test and ICA will continue to lie. Shocker.
 
Judge Jeanine"If I cross examine her I won't be a judge." lol
 
Ill try again. Also, didn't Baez, on the phone, tell Geraldo that he did not have a deal with this guy, that he wanted to do a more respectful interview?

That is what I heard! Here is that part of Geraldo on another persons youtube. (He was on a cell phone so it garbles at times but notice too, the Geraldo tells him to stand by the window!)
Part you are looking for starts at the 4 min mark:
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/user/gadzoda#p/a/u/2/5QOlowfErTk"]‪gadzoda's Channel‬‏ - YouTube[/ame]
 


Thank you for posting this video.
From the moment I heard of this case, and saw the beautiful face of Caylee on the news, I have cried. When the not guilty came down, I was so furious and I cried harder for Caylee knowing she will never get justice for what happened to her. Not in the legal way that is. When I watched KC walk from the jail I felt the same way as this video. Not one person in Caylee’s life protected her against the one person that they all knew would harm her.
 
There is no way JB could have possibly seen what he was getting himself into become FCA's 'savior' In the process of being her defender, he deliberately and systematically alienated her from anyone who ever cared about her and became her all in all. Now he's all she has. Let the honeymoon begin.

BBM.... I know you mean figuratively, of course... but if he is with her in Za or CA or SC or wherever.... I would *NOT* be surprised to hear in a few months that she's preggers w/his baby. Then she'd have him at her disposal (financially) all of her life.

:rolleyes::rolleyes:

No, more like: :bang:
 
She'll be lonely, even in the bathroom ... poor little victim.

Nah........she'll have turds to support her............in more ways than one! :floorlaugh:
 
Does anyone really believe that Casey Anthony was offered a scholarship to a Photography school in California?? The pictures she has taken are nothing special... at all. Anyone could have taken those pictures. Every person in the world takes pictures like this in their every day life.

Casey has never... ever finished anything. She didn't even attempt to get her GED while incarcerated. Photography takes actual work and dedication. It costs a lot of money to buy the right equipment and you have to learn about all the little details of what goes into taking amazing, one-of-a-kind pictures.

I know this because my mom, in her older age, has taken to photography. We bought her an extremely expensive camera and lens and she takes classes every week to learn how to use this complex piece of equipment. She spends hours and hours out in the wilderness (beaches, parks, trails, etc...) and takes pictures. She's actually getting really good.

What kind of pictures can Casey Anthony actually take that would make money? Pictures of herself? And how long will that last? Not long at all, imo.

That is exactly what I've been wondering ... Casey is not a photographer, she's a nobody with a camera that took photos of her daughter prior to murdering her. The photos were sold because of public curiosity, not because there was anything special about her photographs.

I completely agree about spending hours in unusual places trying to capture the perfect light, the perfect frame, the perfect event. I highly doubt Casey has the patience to take a good photo.
 
That is what I heard! Here is that part of Geraldo on another persons youtube. (He was on a cell phone so it garbles at times but notice too, the Geraldo tells him to stand by the window!)
Part you are looking for starts at the 4 min mark:
‪gadzoda's Channel‬‏ - YouTube

What the $%# is so brilliant about defaming someone with the worst lie you can possibly say about a man - that he sexually abused his daughter.

Geraldo is sooooooooooooooooooo full of the proverbial.

Thank you newsjunkie. You have been wonderful.
 
I was outside doing yardwork today and one of the times I came inside for a few minutes I heard Beth Karas saying Casey isn't the same person she was back in 2008. Really? What's changed? What has she been doing or surrounded by that would make her change? She's been pretty much by herself or with other inmates that have also made poor life choices......and her defense team. Her conversations with her family were lies just like before she was put back in jail.

So.........what in any of that would make her change?

I'm thinking Casey's whole thought process as to how she was able to get out of this case with a NG verdict is simple, and she's said it before: "I'm such a good liar". To Casey, even the verdict alone reinforces her behaviour must have been ok.
 
OK let me pose a question to you.

Baez says we should all accept that Casey has constitutional rights because she was acquitted of the murder, manslaughter, child abuse. That if we believe in the system we must accept the jury verdict.

Ponder this. Why then is it OK for Casey not to accept the jury verdict on the 4 lying to Police Officer charges since they admitted it in trial? :waitasec:

Where in the Constitution does it say it works one way? For only the Accused?
 
I've got a question for this big first interview:

1. After you were informed that Caylee had been found in the woods, how did you know that she was wrapped up in a baby blanket and black trash bags?



I'm sure we all could come up with a pretty good list for this first interview.
 
OK let me pose a question to you.

Baez says we should all accept that Casey has constitutional rights because she was acquitted of the murder, manslaughter, child abuse. That if we believe in the system we must accept the jury verdict.

Ponder this. Why then is it OK for Casey not to accept the jury verdict on the 4 lying to Police Officer charges since they admitted it in trial? :waitasec:

Where in the Constitution does it say it works one way? For only the Accused?

I can answer that. It's because her Defense team are all four-letter words that I'm not allowed to type here. They didn't have to pull that stunt to get her out of the depo with ZFG. They could have just said "we admit to everything. Let's go straight to damages."
 
Did I just hear JVM say that Al Taylor is going to plead to Casey on her show tonight to accept his offer? Think that is what I heard.....
 
OK let me pose a question to you.

Baez says we should all accept that Casey has constitutional rights because she was acquitted of the murder, manslaughter, child abuse. That if we believe in the system we must accept the jury verdict.

Ponder this. Why then is it OK for Casey not to accept the jury verdict on the 4 lying to Police Officer charges since they admitted it in trial? :waitasec:

Where in the Constitution does it say it works one way? For only the Accused?

Exactly. We cannot appeal the verdict. This is why we have a voice. If we feel something went wrong then we have a right to ask that it be fixed. Jurors from profitting off their service is wrong. You are employed by the courts to do a job. If any money is earned it should go to the State. That is the way it is in private companies today. jmo
 
OK let me pose a question to you.

Baez says we should all accept that Casey has constitutional rights because she was acquitted of the murder, manslaughter, child abuse. That if we believe in the system we must accept the jury verdict.

Ponder this. Why then is it OK for Casey not to accept the jury verdict on the 4 lying to Police Officer charges since they admitted it in trial? :waitasec:

Where in the Constitution does it say it works one way? For only the Accused?


:rocker: Great point !!!

:waitasec: I would answer ... but I don't want a T/O ... or to get banned !

:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:
 
I was outside doing yardwork today and one of the times I came inside for a few minutes I heard Beth Karas saying Casey isn't the same person she was back in 2008..

How does Beth know. FWIW, Beth is the most tongue tied reporter I have had the misfortune to watch and half the time does not answer the question asked.
 
Awe...these video replay's of the Anthony's hammer welding, belligerent activities and indignant attitudes, should serve their new foundation well! Keep on playin' em...:)
 
OK let me pose a question to you.

Baez says we should all accept that Casey has constitutional rights because she was acquitted of the murder, manslaughter, child abuse. That if we believe in the system we must accept the jury verdict.

Ponder this. Why then is it OK for Casey not to accept the jury verdict on the 4 lying to Police Officer charges since they admitted it in trial? :waitasec:

Where in the Constitution does it say it works one way? For only the Accused?

What Baez doesn't get is that we do accept the verdict (we have no alternative -we don't get to appeal) but we don't agree with it. We believe this verdict allows her to get away with murdering her child and we have a Constitutional right to speak out -- even if it hurts his feelings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
151
Guests online
616
Total visitors
767

Forum statistics

Threads
625,651
Messages
18,507,623
Members
240,828
Latest member
The Flamazing Finder
Back
Top