Dr.Fessel
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2009
- Messages
- 10,903
- Reaction score
- 28
I hope that can was photographed before it got moved to the tarp.
You know that is not a tea can. But they call it a tea can. Is it really the can Trayvon had?
I hope that can was photographed before it got moved to the tarp.
Wal-mart bags are white oops and some blue ones?. 7 11 bags are tannish.
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=7+11...&w=600&h=800&ei=F5S2T__HBKaa2AXW3vypCQ&zoom=1
That's odd, why did he need an empty bag?
This is the kicker and I agree. If not for GZ's actions of running after and confronting TM, none of this would have ever happened. Believe me when I say that this will be an integral part of the Prosecution's case. The confrontation was avoidable had GZ just listened to the dispatcher's instruction.
There is no way GZ can utilize SYG or self defense in this instance. Actually, they have every right to utilize them, but they will not be successful.
YES! This is fascinating. We're not talking about two different witnesses giving two different statements. We're talking about the parents of Trayvon, one saying yes that's my son, the other saying no that's not my son. I wonder if they were listening to different tapes. I don't know, but this sure is interesting!
I also thought it was interesting that a witness was told that the screams came from GZ, not TM.
IMO...being killed by a stranger for innocently walking home from the store (by someone who first refused to answer a simple question as to WHY they were being followed) is far more heinous than being beat up.
Trayvon did not need to die! GZ did not need to be beat up. GZ should have used a little common sense instead of acting impulsively and rushing to judgment. At the very least GZ could have answered Trayvon when he was asked, "Why are you following me?" But he didn't...and that is where this sad, sad situation took a turn for the worst.
If there is any lesson to be learned here it is to NOT rush to judgement and act in a manner that could potentially put yourself or others in harms way! Approach others from a place of peace vs. hostility/aggression. With a little forethought and consideration for consequesnces to actions, many sensless tragedies can be avoided.
~JMHO
You know that is not a tea can. But they call it a tea can. Is it really the can Trayvon had?
There appear to be two different bags marked. One with a #2, and one with a #3. #2 is a tan bag, appears to be a small 7-11 bag. #3 is a white bag, appears to be a Walmart bag. To me, it says "mart" on the bag. Two (at least) of the Walmarts in Brevard County have switched to dark grey bags, replacing the white and blue ones.
The information about rustling in the bushes might be the missing piece. It's possible TM hid in the bushes and it could be determined to be "lying in wait."
The bushes information might not help the TM case at all.
Was it a plastic bag? One of the evidence photos was one of a plastic bag like you get in a store.
Any idea why they didn't put the rest of his stuff from his pockets on the yellow tarp?Im sure that is the one TM had. It's on the yellow tarp that was covering his body.
Arizona makes Tea. That is their main product.
Perhaps LE saw Arizona and wrote tea on the report.
I'm sure there were more important things going on that night than reading an ingrediant list.
JMO
I don't think MOM blacked out anything, all those documents came from the prosecutors office.
When did he put the skittles and drink in his pocket?IIRC, there were two bags--one brought by a neighbor to use on the wound, and another one.
Regardless, if there was a 7-11 bag in the store video and at the scene, I'd begin to suspect that is how TM got the upper hand. It's possible he swung the bag with can and/or skittles like a sock full of quarters. Might make more sense, especially since TM had no damage to his hands.
Why is it Trayvon at 17 years-old should be held to a higher standard than an adult- GZ?
~JMHO
Any idea why they didn't put the rest of his stuff from his pockets on the yellow tarp?
I understand that but it matters not in this case. The dispatcher specifically told him that they didn't need him to do that. Logic and common sense would tell any person that that means to stop following and/or running after him. Nobody can disagree that GZ should have stayed in his truck to wait for the real police to do their own job.In the past, GZ had called LE and they did not arrive in time to locate whomever GZ saw.
That's why he would get out of his vehicle and try to maintain visual awareness of the person he was reporting.
BBM
GZ is not a property owner, he just rents.
If we are getting technical about whether or not the Arizona can was tea or watermelon fruit cocktail - the yellow "tarp" is not a tarp - it's a "biohazard sheet."
I understand that but it matters not in this case. The dispatcher specifically told him that they didn't need him to do that. Logic and common sense would tell any person that that means to stop following and/or running after him. Nobody can disagree that GZ should have stayed in his truck to wait for the real police to do their own job.
This is not the first time that GZ had followed or pursued someone in his desperate attempt to act like LE, which he is clearly not.