First of all, does anyone here remember the date of the Sievers wedding in 2003?
Can't find the specific text now,
But MS sends TS a message in June saying happy anniversary, she responds with something like she "didn't consider it as one, but whatever." < something similar.
We know that her divorce was final the end of March of 2003 (23th?) so they were NOT married in June. Wasn't it 7-8 months after they met? So maybe Oct. or November 2003. Does anyone here the date? Maybe June is when they met.
BTW ~ Just kiddin with ya Oregon.
IMO ~ Mark kept very detailed notes of TS's "cycles." It appears she was very regular as in every 28 days. He notes day 1, and then day 2. Then "no pudding for 30 days"...30-2 = 28.
TS was very much into eating a healthy diet of organic and natural foods.
As most of us women know, the week or so before that time of the month, we crave chocolate and junk food, and lots of it. TS's craving was possibly pudding, which then enabled the whole family to have something they rarely ate. ??
IDK, but it makes sense to me.
After my eyes began to cross from his insane bragging about his sexual adventures, I read that as boinkbarb. I instantly thought how callous of him to have her listed that way in his phone. It wasn't until after I read more posts here that I then realized there was no i in the name. :giggle:
Can't find the specific text now,
But MS sends TS a message in June saying happy anniversary, she responds with something like she "didn't consider it as one, but whatever." < something similar.
We know that her divorce was final the end of March of 2003 (23th?) so they were NOT married in June. Wasn't it 7-8 months after they met? So maybe Oct. or November 2003. Does anyone here the date? Maybe June is when they met.
SURE, of course we are allowed to sleuth ALL the people mentioned in the documents. We can even take notes if we want. We just can't post about them :shutup: or discuss them in any way :shush: But we can certainly sleuth themAre we allowed to sleuth the ppl mentioned in the documents? I'm asking about the realtor specifically.
BTW ~ Just kiddin with ya Oregon.
I was reading some MS calendar entries today and noticed Day 1 of period then the next day he entered Day 2 period then the next entry was "no pudding for 30 days" Maybe MS had some of the same concerns as your BF![]()
Ha! You threw me at the 30 days. What in the world could that be about?
IMO ~ Mark kept very detailed notes of TS's "cycles." It appears she was very regular as in every 28 days. He notes day 1, and then day 2. Then "no pudding for 30 days"...30-2 = 28.
TS was very much into eating a healthy diet of organic and natural foods.
As most of us women know, the week or so before that time of the month, we crave chocolate and junk food, and lots of it. TS's craving was possibly pudding, which then enabled the whole family to have something they rarely ate. ??
IDK, but it makes sense to me.
Very sad text. :frown: Unfortunately, we now know the reason he never responded. He was too busy plotting her murder to bother with a vacation they wouldn't be taking.More texts to CWW on 05/09/2015 asking whether CWW got whatever it was and to "text first b/c u never know."
However (!), only one text to Teresa on that day and it was to ask her to bring something home (one flexing?) She actually sent a text first that day suggesting a vacation spot for presumably the summer. He never responded except to ask her to bring that thing home "please."
(seacrest svehla bonkbarb) <-----Who is this? Obviously an "affair" but I don't recognize the name format? TIA.
After my eyes began to cross from his insane bragging about his sexual adventures, I read that as boinkbarb. I instantly thought how callous of him to have her listed that way in his phone. It wasn't until after I read more posts here that I then realized there was no i in the name. :giggle: