Sister Golden Hair
Former Member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2022
- Messages
- 1,395
- Reaction score
- 8,980
OTOH IGI -- it's definitely hard to be objective in certain cases. OTOH, I would contend that BK essentially did plead Not Guilty, but he did not speak for good reason IMO. For one thing, there's no way he could have said the words "not guilty" in just the "right" voice. No matter what he'd said or how he'd said it or the tone he'd used, it would have been held against him by many, so silence might be the better choice.Certainly no offense taken, SGH. I understand the legality of it and the drive to live as well. But I'm an old fart, brought up to be strong enough to stand by my ingrained convictions.
And I imagine if I were innocent and found myself in his position, I would feel like it's too akin to lying to stand mute. Even more so if it would be to only my own benefit to do so. As I age, I do see more gray areas of rights and wrongs in life choices, but not so much here.
Also, from an objective standpoint, I don't see it as lying to stand mute, but I'm afraid many do. That's unfortunate (and not meant as criticism here), but it's one of our most important rights, so for silence to be interpreted as guilt (or not not guilty enough), that makes the right to remain silent meaningless at a minimum, or even worse, equal to guilty. That's my issue with the way standing silent is being misconstrued by many. We have the 5th Amendment for a reason. It's also the reason I want to see really clear evidence in this case and either BARD way above and beyond or Not Guilty in equally convincing manner. JMO
Last edited: