maskedwoman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2008
- Messages
- 1,627
- Reaction score
- 8,017
Very very interesting. Thank you for sharing!RE: the defense request in regards to the autopsy and the 3 officers' bodycams, photos, notes, etc.
<modsnip>
Again, legal wording (my sister worked for a state's attorney for 30 years, so I've had this drilled into my head over and over) is very precise and each word in the defense's requests are carefully chosen. Sadly, she's no longer alive or I would be able to ask her and then give you all her 3 page long rant about legal language precision and defense attorneys. The request stated "collected at the autopsy by Tolleson, Vargas, and Gunnerson." As in those items listed that were created during the autopsy only. Notes/reports that the officers made once back at the station would be entirely separate entities and would have been turned over separately from this line item in the requests.
All photographs, audio recordings of notes, logs of evidence and documentation of transfer of evidence, and reports created by the ME and their staff would come later directly from the ME office.
Interesting bit I found from the Spokane County Medical Examiner Quality Management Manual:
"While law enforcement personnel, forensic unit, and occasionally prosecutors may observe autopsy and body evidence collection, they are allowed no input into the inspection/examination process. These individuals witness, but don’t participate."
Last edited by a moderator: