- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 70,203
- Reaction score
- 273,628
I do think there are a few hurdles for the survivors during the cross examination.I doubt the survivor's testimony will be very important in this case. For one survivor, she can roughly establish the time of the crime and a bushy eyed man in a mask. We don't know anything about what the other survivor saw or heard (other than rumors).
The defense has access to their police interviews and statements. Most likely they will emphasize points they feel are beneficial to their case. They will also likely emphasize that neither witness got a good look at the perpetrator. Unless one or both change their stories from earlier statements, there is no need or benefit to grilling either witness.
Why didn't DM call 911 or at least call out to roomies and check on them? I think she will be questioned about that.
They will ask 'did you often see masked men in all black coming down the stairs at 4 am?' That didn't worry you? '
The other hurdle MIGHT be about the early morning texts between the 2 survivors---if the reports are true. Again, same question will probably come up---why didn't they check on roommates or call 911 earlier?
I think they probably have ample explanations---however the defensive is making hay and amplifying the doubts and concerns. JMO