katiecoolady
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2004
- Messages
- 9,177
- Reaction score
- 2,513
KCL, you said a few days ago you heard or knew that Juan had some "bomshells" coming in. Maybe bombshell wasn't the word but...without giving to much info do you think they will be brought in during rebuttal and do you think they are going to have a big affect on the jury?. I am certainly not trying to be Ye of little faith, but I am disappointed that the judge let in the power point and the magazine articles in. I really did not think Samuels was anything special up on the stand. I am not sure of what the evidentiary hearing is about today either. I just don't want a trial by ambush. Nurmi and Wilmont must be taking lessons from Baez.
On another note, I hope you got some rest last night. Prayers for you and your brother...big cyber hug on the way to you.
I just meant that when the info about the third gas can and the Wamu statement "there's more where that came from" meaning info we aren't aware of yet. I have no idea what it may be but I do believe based on a credible source that to be true. I didn't see any of yesterday's witness so am watching him now and I find him not a very commanding witness. And what I'm picking up is that he seems to be someone who primarily gave JA a roadmap of how to behave in front of the jury in order to pull off this charade. That's right up her alley as all she does is mimic how she believes she's to,behave anyway. He's offering up a list of descriptions of behavior and she's taking notes. Of,course once the jury leaves I've seen her brighten up and show animation and her mask of flat affect lifts.
I will name this witness Acting Coach in my observation.
He also doesn't come across that commanding to me other than in his own mind. Juan will make mincemeat out of him.
This case will be decided toward guilt, IMO, primarily on one thing: the brutality and forensics in this crime...9 stab wounds to the back. That and a third gas can.