TTF14
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 16,573
- Reaction score
- 77,830
Oh I agree. Once you read discovery, all those details are off the table for me. It would have to be pre-discovery, before the police even told the person any details about the crime. Like a compete spontaneous utterance, unprompted by any clues or suggestions.
I think a jury will see it this way as well.
IMO