- Joined
- Jan 26, 2019
- Messages
- 10,697
- Reaction score
- 89,103
Do you have a link for this please, TIAIt's even more exceedingly odd that she was not even dressed in the clothes Libby was reportedly wearing! Where'd they come from?
IMO MOO
Do you have a link for this please, TIAIt's even more exceedingly odd that she was not even dressed in the clothes Libby was reportedly wearing! Where'd they come from?
IMO MOO
That's what I thought.
And about the jailhouse confession...overheard and recorded by LE.
The state’s eavesdropping statute, 720 ILCS 5/14-1, -2, makes it a crime to record a “private conversation” without the consent of all parties involved.
If that holds for prisoners, then the confession is inadmissible.
Do you have a link for this please, TIA
DeletedThere is no expectation of privacy during phone calls between inmates/arrestees and their family members and friends. In fact, many jails and prisons give warnings to arrestees/inmates and their visitors that their conversations may be recorded.
Are Inmate Phone Calls Private? Are They Public Record? | Balduchi Law Office, PC.
Where does GH say Abby didn't have Libby's clothes on but someone else's? TIA
Where does GH say Abby didn't have Libby's clothes on but someone else's? TIA
With that in mind...do you think him dumb enough to confess over the telephone to killing the girls?The confessions are admissible.
Indiana says the contents of wire tapped conversations must be disclosed to the subject prior to trial.
That’s been done officially so no problem with that evidence.
There’s no limit to Indiana Law Enforcement's disclosure of wire tapped contents:
https://books.google.com/books?id=HEL0M-boMpgC&pg=PA22&lpg=PA22&dq=eavesdropping+statute,+720+ILCS+5/14-1,+-2,+Indiana&source=bl&ots=9mquWtV1v0&sig=ACfU3U0EubxEUxM76hFiItnNFmAobSnM7Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi4ltzj_ZeHAxVFG9AFHVcPAd4Q6AF6BAgKEAM#v=onepage&q=eavesdropping statute, 720 ILCS 5/14-1, -2, Indiana&f=false
Offenders are advised during admission and orientation of the offender telephone system privileges and are required to sign a document indicating the parameters of the calling system.
It is posted that facility calls may be monitored and recorded:
>>>>>>>>
State of Indiana
Indiana Department of Correction
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES Manual of Policies and Procedures
[…]
The telephones used in the offender calling system may be connected to a telephone monitoring device.
[…]
Offenders shall be advised during facility orientation that telephone calls made using the offender calling system may be monitored. Signs are to be posted prominently above the telephones used in the offender calling system indicating that any telephone call may be monitored and/or recorded.
[…]
https://www.in.gov/idoc/files/02-01-105_AP_Telephone_Privileges_3-15-03.pdf
imo
I didn't say that. Let me go read what I said again in case I had a typo!
YesWith that in mind...do you think him dumb enough to confess over the telephone to killing the girls?
TTF14 said:I didn't say that. Let me go read what I said again in case I had a typo!
Abby, according to the FM, was wearing Libby's jeans. I believe there's a photo of clothes recovered from Deer Creek and it looks like Libby's shirt is included in them. I believe also in the FM it said Abby had her shirt on and a sweatshirt (probably the same one she's shown wearing in the bridge picture Libby took of her?)OK, I didn't have a typo. I think I was just misunderstood.
When the girls went missing, the family said Abby was wearing XX and Libby was wearing YY.
When the girls were found, Libby was nude and Abby was wearing ZZ, reportedly Libby's clothes.
What happened to YY? What happened to XX? Gray Hughes says "that concept (of what the girls were originally wearing) is no longer a reality."
Abby, according to the FM, was wearing Libby's jeans. I believe there's a photo of clothes recovered from Deer Creek and it looks like Libby's shirt is included in them. I believe also in the FM it said Abby had her shirt on and a sweatshirt (probably the same one she's shown wearing in the bridge picture Libby took of her?)
What "ZZ" clothes are you saying GH was talking about on Abby?
I think the misunderstanding is Libby wearing jeans, not grey sweatpants. The other sweatshirt was probably borrowed from in Kelsei's car?Abby was not wearing the sweatshirt she was pictured in on the bridge. She was wearing a black Delphi swim sweatshirt. And Libby's jeans.
XX: Abby's skinny jeans, pink top, gray hoodie
YY: Gray sweatpants with black lettering, tie-dye T-shirt
ZZ: Black Delphi swim hoodie, Libby's jeans
If RA is the killer, how'd he get a hold of Libby's outfit to dress Abby in? Libby wasn't wearing it. Did the girls bring a change of clothes?
When Abby was found, she was not wearing the sweatshirt she was pictured in on the bridge. She was wearing a black Delphi swim sweatshirt. And Libby's jeans.
XX: Abby's skinny jeans, pink top, gray hoodie
YY: Gray sweatpants with black lettering, tie-dye T-shirt
ZZ: Black Delphi swim hoodie, Libby's jeans
If RA is the killer, how'd he get a hold of Libby's outfit to dress Abby in? Libby wasn't wearing it. Did the girls bring a change of clothes?
ETA: to clarify my first sentence
But I thought long ago it was cleared up that BP was mistaken about the sweatpants?
I absolutely believe RA confessed the truth to his wife and mother, the 2 people closest to him. For what purpose; debatable:With that in mind...do you think him dumb enough to confess over the telephone to killing the girls?
Nothing. The main investigators were deposed by the defense team and it was confirmed there is no direct evidence. No dna, fingerprints or digital data that connects RA to crime scene or victims.
Where has this information come other than the unreliable defense and the franks motion?
Didn’t Libby’s sister give them sweatshirts to take with them?!
The leaked crime scene photos.
And yes, about eight months after the crime, the "I gave them sweatshirts to wear" emerged as part of the events/timeline of that morning. It was not in the original description.
IMO MOO
With that in mind...do you think him dumb enough to confess over the telephone to killing the girls?