It's hard to know where to start with all this, but I am glad it's finally all out in the open, and because it is from an approved source, we can at last discuss some things here which have been obvious for some time.
I've suspected ever since BM had DH on his podcast after the MW leak fiasco that BM was the new conduit for Defence messaging. This makes sense as he is an attorney and thus it would be difficult for that ever to be pierced. And the Habeas professor who claimed to have no contact with the defence yet is doing media hits and on every conspiratorial youtube who will have him. Now we know how the cut out structure works.
This answers the biggest question for me, that
I asked of attorney
@O.Incandenza back in january. Was this an intentional leak?
(Answer snipped for focus)
My thinking was too caught up in a traditional media strategy and I agreed with O.Incandenza that this made no sense. But now I think we know what AB was doing with MW. I am confident MW had access to everything. And perhaps it really is the case that MW simply messed up and they got caught.
In any event, i was intrigued by the MS's theory that the defence's real strategy is to copy the Karen Read template. Now we know what they were so confident in saying that
MOO