You forgot the “sarcasm” font, lol!Simple. He was arrested. Therefore, the Prosecution must "have the goods." End of story. Let's just get to the sentencing phase.
IMO MOO


You forgot the “sarcasm” font, lol!Simple. He was arrested. Therefore, the Prosecution must "have the goods." End of story. Let's just get to the sentencing phase.
IMO MOO
For me it would be all things digital. Can they link RA to the cultists or KK?My "indisputable evidence" meter is a hair above empty. I'm down for DNA and that's about it.
What would it be for you?
All joking aside, I felt that way for many years. I fully trusted the system in my county.You forgot the “sarcasm” font, lol!![]()
True enough.I have always thought the statement that RA has no ties to Odinism (per defense in the FM) was self-defeating and meaningless. If the crime has no proven ties to Odinism, then RA can’t be discounted by that claim.
jmo
For me it would be all things digital.
There was a comment in this line of discussion that said maybe RA was on the bridge and lead the girls to the other guys waiting. There was another comment that maybe they were both being initiated. I was responding to those suggestions.Franks 1. The d asserts that RA has no known ties to Odinism.
This logic from RA doesn't make much sense for me. Wouldn't his family be spared from seeing photos of the bodies/crime scene if he pleas out and doesn't allow this to go to trial?Harshman also said Allen expressed fears that his family will no longer love him after the trial, during which they will see graphic photos of the girls' bodies.
This logic from RA doesn't make much sense for me. Wouldn't his family be spared from seeing photos of the bodies/crime scene if he pleas out and doesn't allow this to go to trial?
Go through your cases? I don't understand what you mean?OK. I'mapparentlywrong. Oh how painful it is to admit that!
I'll have to go through my cases and see where my thinking went wrong.
Maybe it wasn't as specifically said to the media back then. LE was extremely closed-mouthed those earlier years.It was a rabbit hole for me. I was trying to find out exactly who said it prior to July 2021.
However, I think the defense team is ok with that time. IMO it somehow works for them.
For me it would be all things digital. Can they link RA to the cultists or KK?
I’m anxious to hear the geofencing testimony if allowed. It would be a crying shame if it were not allowed. Let’s face it, if JG disallows it, it would spoil it for every IN prosecutor that planned to use it in the future. NM’s claim that it is unreliable is ridiculous. He wants it out because it doesn’t help his case and may reflect positively on RA. JMO
I think the issue with the cell phone data may be that RA lives so close to the crime scene he can't be ruled in or out. I doubt if they have exact location (GPS) data due to the passage of time from date of crime to date of invesigating/arresting him. Even if they do the location data isn't always accurate.
For example a few months ago my husband and I were home on a weekday morning (husband was on vacaction, I don't work) and the doorbell rings. He answers and I am right behind him. A county sheriff deputy is standing there and asks us if everything is ok as they received a 911 call from our address. We look at each other and him and say no. I ask him if he can tell us the number the call came from and he does. Husband and I search our phones for the number to see if it is a neighbor and it is a neighbor across the road. We tell him and he goes to their house. We later find out our neighbor was watching her grandson and he got a hold of her phone and called 911! Just an example of how cell data may not pinpoint an exact location.
That's a great example. (And glad everyone was OK).
OK. I'mapparentlywrong. Oh how painful it is to admit that!
I'll have to go through my cases and see where my thinking went wrong.
neither does eating or smearing one's feces about and yet apparently RA was doing that as well at one point after he began confessing.This logic from RA doesn't make much sense for me. Wouldn't his family be spared from seeing photos of the bodies/crime scene if he pleas out and doesn't allow this to go to trial?
smearing feces is a well known action to take if you want people to think you've lost your mind...so is eating odd things like paper....Just my humble opinion (but from the medical world I've been in for 33 years).neither does eating or smearing one's feces about and yet apparently RA was doing that as well at one point after he began confessing.
Well he can go back to claiming he didn't do it and he was afraid for his family so he confessed. If his family wasn't receptive to him confessing (weather they think he did or didn't do it, I don't know) then he likely fell back to the I didn't do it angle so even if they see the photos, he can say he didn't do that to the girls.This logic from RA doesn't make much sense for me. Wouldn't his family be spared from seeing photos of the bodies/crime scene if he pleas out and doesn't allow this to go to trial?