- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 8,125
- Reaction score
- 116,765
The link was for Cicero’s testimony. He’s a blood spatter expert. Here is a link.I'm struggling with OP's link -- error msg that URL is expired? Thanks for help.. x
The link was for Cicero’s testimony. He’s a blood spatter expert. Here is a link.I'm struggling with OP's link -- error msg that URL is expired? Thanks for help.. x
Here is the KK PCA.<modsnip: Quoted post was removed>
It's been speculated that one sock and one pair of underwear was missing. Someone posted the SW the other day on here. I'll have to go back and take a look. We might want to look at RL's search warrant too. Was the search warrant for KK ever released?
RSBM - this. And to be fair, many of us said at the time it was mostly wild speculation. i.e it was evident on its face IMO.
Yes - i.e the Morphew Strategy.
MOO
Search return: headbandsHere is the KK PCA.
Description of items found in SW in here:
I brought up the headbands the other day as possibly linked to Abby due to her hair being in that updo on 13 February. Curious too as to your point about the females living within his household and where they were found. One wouldn't think they just waltzed into the bathroom to snap them up without reason.Search return: headbands
In the snapchat video, AW's hair is in an updo. Perhaps a headband wound into a binder? Missing from the CS? It's a curious thing to have been taken from the RA household since females lived there. Perhaps where they were found was compelling. Trophy style.
jmo
Photo from link
Why wouldn't they? I would actually do this out of respect for the family. I think this was very classy of them regardless of whether they were advised to do so by the lawyers or opted to of their volition.Allen's defense attorneys let RA's wife and mother know when the testimony of the girls injuries was coming up and they left the courtroom. Why would they leave the courtroom?
A lot of people don't have the ability to sit through that kind of testimony regardless of their connection, or lack thereof, to the parties in the case. And court decorum rules require the gallery to sit quietly and unobtrusively through such testimony. If you know you're going to be upset or nauseated by it, then leaving before it begins is absolutely the right thing to do.Why wouldn't they? I would actually do this out of respect for the family. I think this was very classy of them regardless of whether they were advised to do so by the lawyers or opted to of their volition.
Did you by chance mean this Henry Lee? Judge finds forensic scientist Henry Lee liable for fabricating evidence in a murder caseHe's an expert in his fields of forensics. It's laid out in the testimony. He also did visit the crime scene with an officer that I believe had been there at the time the scene was still active. Most blood experts that testify at trial are brought in afterwards, not during the scene processing. Henry Lee comes to mind, there are others.
If the D have done exactly this - accused people of murder, who are not on trial, and the Defense has faced no legal consequences to date over this, then it would appear, yes, it is legally acceptable to do exactly this in the way that they did.So is it morally wrong but not legally wrong, so it's OK to publicly accuse some men of murdering young girls, even if morally wrong to do so?
Red added by me for focus: I am interested to know which of the allegations made by the Defense the State views as untrue, and which are truthful. I hope we find out at the trial.The actions of the D are repugnant, no regard for the victims of the crime, worse than ambulance chasers. To think how the FM has been referenced as gospel facts of the crime, absolutely disgusting. MOO
All true, what McLeland write.
BBM
In response, the prosecution has sought to discredit the vast majority of the defense's claims, calling the memorandum "colorful, dramatic, and highly unprofessional."![]()
Former Delphi cop thinks suspect is innocent but doesn't believe cult theory
A RETIRED detective who investigated the Delphi murders doesn’t believe Richard Allen is responsible for the infamous killings – but he also doesn’t buy the defense’s claims…www.the-sun.com
"It's not completely true," wrote prosecutor Nick McLeland of the defense's claims, adding that the allegations made "are not supported by evidence…
….McLeland further claimed only 13 pages of the defense's 136-page filing was relevant to their request for a Frank's Hearing and the "remaining 90% of the Memorandum outlines its fanciful defense for social media to devour."
In a filing on Tuesday, McLeland once again sought to pour cold water on the claims, calling them "unfounded allegations" supported by "absolutely no proof."
He accused the defense of "consuming the limited resources of the office and this court with repetitive motions that lack any factual basis.”
If someone accused my husband or son of something so horrible that I didn't think they did, I would want to know ALL of the details of said crime but I guess that is just me. Also the reason I was bringing it up was because RA stated he was concerned about his family seeing what he'd done. His mother and wife leaving at that time in some way validates his confession(s). Imo.Why wouldn't they? I would actually do this out of respect for the family. I think this was very classy of them regardless of whether they were advised to do so by the lawyers or opted to of their volition.
I wonder if he would have changed his plea if JG had decided to allow the trial to be televised. Would be extremely hard for his wife and mother to avoid seeing or hearing the details of the evidence presented. JmoBingo and because RA didn't want them to see what he'd done to them.
Question about this: the D stated there was no dna found in the search warrant to connect RA to murders - would that not include AW's hairband thing? DocumentCloud (P.129)Search return: headbands
In the snapchat video, AW's hair is in an updo. Perhaps a headband wound into a binder? Missing from the CS? It's a curious thing to have been taken from the RA household since females lived there. Perhaps where they were found was compelling. Trophy style.
jmo
Photo from link
Interesting that they validate the confessions in your mind. That never occurred to me. I just assume they left because they were advised to or did not want to stay for their own personal reasons - either of which is fine imo. I cannot make any link between their actions and those "confessions" at this time. Maybe I can draw that link if more information is revealed at trial about them....If someone accused my husband or son of something so horrible that I didn't think they did, I would want to know ALL of the details of said crime but I guess that is just me. Also the reason I was bringing it up was because RA stated he was concerned about his family seeing what he'd done. His mother and wife leaving at that time in some way validates his confession(s). Imo.
"advised to leave" - by whom? I am sure the DT would have warned them that something graphic was about to be shown, but if they are going to publicly declare their support for the person accused of this graphic crime, IMO, they morally shouldn't shy away from seeing those acts.Interesting that they validate the confessions in your mind. That never occurred to me. I just assume they left because they were advised to or did not want to stay for their own personal reasons - either of which is fine imo. I cannot make any link between their actions and those "confessions" at this time. Maybe I can draw that link if more information is revealed at trial about them....
Richard Allen stated he was worried about his family seeing the pictures/evidence of his crimes and right before this evidence is introduced Andrew Baldwin speaks with RA's mother and wife and they leave the courtroom. You can't make a link?Interesting that they validate the confessions in your mind. That never occurred to me. I just assume they left because they were advised to or did not want to stay for their own personal reasons - either of which is fine imo. I cannot make any link between their actions and those "confessions" at this time. Maybe I can draw that link if more information is revealed at trial about them....
No - I have no actual information what what his "confessions" were exactly? The only link I could possibly make in the absence of more info is that RA possibly HAS seen gory crime scene photos and could have been worried for his loved ones to see them - the whole once you see them, you cannot unsee them kinda thing, and I imagine they're horrific for anyone to see. I would want my loved ones not to see them as well, regardless of my guilt or innocence.Richard Allen stated he was worried about his family seeing the pictures/evidence of his crimes and right before this evidence is introduced Andrew Baldwin speaks with RA's mother and wife and they leave the courtroom. You can't make a link?
Maybe the lawyers for RA advised them it would not be prudent for them to stay? I dunno... its just moo that they left of their own accord or were possibly advised to by his lawyers... MOO MOO MOO"advised to leave" - by whom? I am sure the DT would have warned them that something graphic was about to be shown, but if they are going to publicly declare their support for the person accused of this graphic crime, IMO, they morally shouldn't shy away from seeing those acts.
Testimony about his confessions came out in the hearings. Det. Harshman and/or Dr. Wala's testimony transcripts should contain that information.No - I have no actual information what what his "confessions" were exactly? The only link I could possibly make in the absence of more info is that RA possibly HAS seen gory crime scene photos and could have been worried for his loved ones to see them - the whole once you see them, you cannot unsee them kinda thing, and I imagine they're horrific for anyone to see. I would want my loved ones not to see them as well, regardless of my guilt or innocence.
Question about this: the D stated there was no dna found in the search warrant to connect RA to murders - would that not include AW's hairband thing? DocumentCloud (P.129)
"V- Richard Allen has no ties to Odinism or any Religious Cult and has no ties to the crime scene. Tony Liggett has testified under oath that there is no DNA linking Richard Allen to the crime scene.184 Liggett further has testified that he is unaware of anything that links Richard to the crime through his phone, computers or electronics
All RS&BBM,.....
I do not think the D made the statements up if they took them from depositions of the named investigators. MOOO