accident?

[rashomon]

I'm not sure if this is correct or not, but I'm thinking someone spread a
blanket on the floor laid JB's on top.

Would her head be pointed to a corner and her feet to a corner the two side corners covered her?

I think the ladies on here will know what I'm talking about, like you would wrap an infant, but of course JB would be too big to wrap that way so her feet and head would be uncovered. Oh, and her arms too becauce they were above her head.

JR said her arms were close together, if JB's body was in full rigor mortis shouldn't they have been close together when JR carried her up from the basement? They were above her head but not close together.


If this scenario is correct, I truly beleive this is what Patsy would do. The last loving thing she would do for her child. This style is a woman thing.

Oh, lawdy I wish I had spell checker on here. You people are so intelligent and write wonderfully.

kaykay :twocents:

JMO

Tthat's how John Ramsey described it: someone had placed a blanket on the floor, put JB on it and wrapped the blanket around her. Her head, hands and feet were still visible.

 

[BBB167893]

You replied this comes from the Ramsey camp and said it was given to them by Grey and San Augustin. Do you think you could tell me where you got this info. I am not disputing it, I just want to back it up to someone who does not believe. Thanks SuperDave.

That's easy. Remember: the media prints what Linny tells 'em, and he got it from them. It's in the "48 Hours" from Dec. 2004: Gray and Augustin are mentioned by name.

Incidentally, Erin Moriarty is a real B**ch. I e-mailed her over the falsehoods in the Oct. 2002 "48 Hours." The response did NOT inspire confidence in her abilities as a serious journalist. If you want, I can reproduce it for you.

 

[Solace]

That's easy. Remember: the media prints what Linny tells 'em, and he got it from them. It's in the "48 Hours" from Dec. 2004: Gray and Augustin are mentioned by name.

Incidentally, Erin Moriarty is a real B**ch. I e-mailed her over the falsehoods in the Oct. 2002 "48 Hours." The response did NOT inspire confidence in her abilities as a serious journalist. If you want, I can reproduce it for you.

She was embarrassed that she was corrected and knew she was wrong. I would love to see anything you can send me. Thanks so much SD.

 

[BBB167893]

Here goes:

I pulled no punches. I said that I thought the program was abominable.

Here is what she said:

If you still believe that he was a man to be ignored, I am shocked. A convicted sex offender can be a danger to all children.

In this country, we profess to believe in the proposition "innocent until proven guilty," but when I read an e-mail such as yours, I fear that concept has been lost.

Imagine my rage when I read that. This woman had the GALL to suggest that I thought sex offenders should be ignored. I didn't like that. And I told her so:

Don't you lecture me on the presumption of innocence. When a man like Marc Klaas says what he has said about John and Patsy, that MEANS something. There's a difference between presumption of innocence and coddling, and that's what you did. I won't speak for everyone, but I believed in them. They killed my presumption of their innocence with their arrogance.

Secondly, I deeply resent the insinuation that I am close-minded. I try to keep an open mind, but not so open that my brains fall out.

No words can sufficiently express my resentment and disappointment at your implication. All I can say is "how dare you?" I am shocked at your willingness to insult me. I want justice, not excuses.

If you want to insult me, you go ahead. I've heard worse, but I am very disappointed in your attitude. If you can't respond intelligently to what I have to say, I have serious reservations about your skills as a journalist, and you ought to be ashamed.

 

[Solace]

Here goes:

I pulled no punches. I said that I thought the program was abominable.

Here is what she said:



Imagine my rage when I read that. This woman had the GALL to suggest that I thought sex offenders should be ignored. I didn't like that. And I told her so:

I especially like the part about "not wanting your brains to fall out".

Thanks for the post SD:clap:

 

[BBB167893]

No prob.

 

[rashomon]

I especially like the part about "not wanting your brains to fall out".

I especially liked that part too. Brilliantly put, SuperDave:

I try to keep an open mind, but not so open that my brains fall out.

:clap:

 

[coloradokares]

Here goes:

I pulled no punches. I said that I thought the program was abominable.

Here is what she said:



Imagine my rage when I read that. This woman had the GALL to suggest that I thought sex offenders should be ignored. I didn't like that. And I told her so:

Can you hear the applause? I think its time for a standing ovation!!

 

[narlacat]

<<I try to keep an open mind, but not so open that my brains fall out.>>


Classic.

Good onya Dave.

 

[JMO8778]

Can you hear the applause? I think its time for a standing ovation!!

WTG ! I'm glad she got exposed!!!!!! That was very unprofessional of her.I think she would have been better off ignoring anything anyone had to say that didn't like it.Instead she exposed her own bias.

 

[BBB167893]

Thank you!