Nurmi refers jurors back to jury instructions - pg 3 - don't be showing sympathy -
pg 7 - evidence back it up
some things have changed from what the state told you from last phase to this one - remember last evidence all this happened in 62 seconds - so no way this story true since only 62 seconds - now expand time 2 minutes to play emotions and sympathy - not what you suppposed to place decision on
Dr. Horn and Det Flores had diffrent versions of events . . .gunshot came first -
if gunshot came first then he was not suffering in way
Dr. Demarte and Samuels and Dr. Horn - all talked about fight or flight a scientifically viable phenomenon . . .brain reacts to subject of adrenaline . . Dr. Horn does tell you adrenaline does prevent pain
going back to . . .. . . being firmly convinced - have you been given proof beyond reasonable doubt adrenaline kicking into TA brain
should have known he would suffer . . . she should have known that when she committed suicide . . . or attempted to . . she experienced pain of the razor - . . .
didn't happen . . .it did happen months weeks after this event - after she was in jail for awhile when she tried to make this attempt
other issue not only fight or flight - consciousness of Ms. Arias - she has to be conscious of what is going on - you must be firmly convinced. . . Dr. Samuels, Dr. Geffner . ..
don't know if you agree with Dr. Demarte . . . she speculated JA had borderline - detachment from her parents - improper forming of herself - one of the characteristics are the extreme violent outbursts.....given you verdict what happened on June 4th was extreme violent outburst . . . one of the episodes was what was happening on 6/4/08 then she was under the affect that Dr. Demarte says she has.
putting emotion aside - only crime scene photos of this nature you have ever seen - separate cruelty in a technical sense something you never thought have to do . . States own experts telling you about her mental condition that exists. . she didn't know she was causing this pain.
proof beyond a reasonable doubt she should have known . .. aggravating factor was indeed not proven.
previously during closing JM told you only just closing argument now have to expand . . . rather than addressing the evidence what you do is talk about the person delivering the information
objection may we approach?