My theory on a few things, but ALL SPECULATION NOT FACT!
Possible sequence of events leading to arrest of PS:
CC is taken > 11yo male witness tries to describe car that CC was taken in and mentions *dark color* *pb brown trim* *toyota* (based off of info in first Amber alerts) > BPD searches CCTV from area and surrounding and locates a car fitting general description that was in area at the correct time > BPD uses CCTV to follow car & find shell station video > BPD posts photos of car and man asking for help identifying/locating > neighbor tips & other intel lead BPD to PS > PS is taken into custody > PS has child











in his possession and is eventually arrested on that charge.
This (combined with search locations) IMO makes it HIGHLY improbable that PS is NOT involved.
I don’t know how CCs parents drama is connected to this if it even is. (But there does seem to be a lot of drama)
My thoughts on what the BPD chief was trying to say at the presser with the video:
-They have identified the two children in the video.
-They have identified the man that engages the two children (most likely as PS although the chief would not say if that was the case)
-They want to identify the other person in the video who does not engage the kids.
-I don’t think that the chief was expressing one way or another if the other person in the video is connected to the crime, just that they would like to speak with them because they were so close to the crime.
-IMO it could have been someone on their phone not even paying attention to their surroundings, but maybe there was something they didn’t realize they saw that might be helpful.
Just some of my thoughts I wanted to put into writing because it is crazy how we all have such different thoughts with the scattered MSM reporting and other confusing aspects of this case.
All IMOO