Thank you
Odd that .. can find other fbc newsletters, even the January 2014 one. But the December one does not appear to be available to the public online.
http://fbcbirmingham.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/January-Newsletter.pdf
Maybe was in the bulletins leading up to his departure or while support raising or such and NOT in the
church newsletter itself.
Many missionaries would talk about sending out a newsletter meaning a paper (or email) type of thing with details, updates, prayer requests, praises, etc. And also typically update on support levels, etc. So I think that might be a phrasing thing in this case. Some do it quarterly, some do it monthly, and some everywhere in between, but it's nearly always a requirement from either the organization, their main sending church, or both. Many then also do more specific emails w/ current happenings/prayer requests/etc. to a very limited or select group.
I wonder why the announcement is so difficult to find?
:waitasec:
But to be honest, it's VERY common to NOT have much in the way of specifics about someone doing missions work in a restricted or 'creative access' country.
Having lived in them and have many still in one or the other, VERY few of them can have something be in print that could go out to an audience and be freely accessed.
Basically, exactly what we'd like to find here. Only over there, it could mean jail, getting kicked out, getting local believers or seekers in trouble, etc.
So some will use a pen name when raising support and communicating about the ministry - and
rarely will any missionaries (even in countries there's no real restriction) name converts, etc. Though very few people know that's the case typically. Some will say names changed for privacy (for converts) or use an obvious code name "Ms Smiley" or something.
Others will allow limited info to be in print on a periodic basis like in church one Sunday, where there will likely be people they don't know wandering in, but they're also not going to have enough info to likely become problematic.
And then there are those who share some on a limited basis but then share more extensively and in greater detail by email or a prayer letter that'd be sent out that they at least know who it's going to, etc. Not that it couldn't be passed on, but...most of those people understand the precautions needed.
It's really only those going to places where there's NO issue with doing overt missions work and typically no history of it ever having been an issue - a very, very limited list of places - that you'll really find missionaries truly able to share in much depth what they're doing and about true nitty gritty of their ministry.
Well, and there are those that kind of use all of them and have different "layers" of what gets communicated and to whom.
With that said, given the situation in Kazakhstan (and notably, obviously towards missions work of any sort by any organization/church) I'd be
surprised if he would have shared a whole lot in depth because it could becoming incredibly problematic down the road. Especially since he shared enough publicly that there was no denying he was planning to use Germany as a base to get in and to basically get around the visa issues in Kaz.