LambChop
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,160
- Reaction score
- 30
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that I believe the pastor is probably the one that's correct. Way back in the beginning, there was a lot of misinformation about the way Karen was found. Someone from Hobby Lobby called 911 for a welfare check or went by her house to check on her. Someone from HL called the church, which then called 911 for a welfare check, etc.
This audio was the day after her funeral and less than a week after the incidents unfolded. Since the church staff and members were actively involved, This was all still very fresh in everyone's mind. The pastor is calling out by name the people that performed various tasks on behalf of the Shahan family.
I used to work at a local television station. I can't speak for every reporter or every news outlet, but I'd be surprised that the inconsistencies in the different media reports were because RS told different stories. There is tremendous pressure to be the "first" with any nugget of news about a high profile story, so rumors sometimes are reported as truth. Most reporters are trying to do a bunch of things at once. Maybe someone didn't write it down and so "Fort Campbell" becomes "Bowling Green" because they're both in Kentucky. Maybe they mixed up the location of the sons (Fort Campbell and Nashville/Franklin).
My point is that these people were way more involved in this crime than any of the reporters were. They knew the Shahans and their family. They knew details, like who drove to pick up RS. That's why I tend to believe this is the closest to the truth. JMOO.
Sometimes reporters do some "creative" reporting and that is why there may be inconsistencies, not because of what a person actually said but because of the way they gather information. I am always suspicious when a reporter claims to have gotten their information from a "source close to the investigation". Any officer or detective that releases information in an ongoing investigation that was not cleared for release takes a chance on losing his job...aka the FBI detective who released the pictures of the Boston bomber. Reporters gather information from a source but not necessarily anyone connected to the investigation.
And you are right they have to be the first to get an exclusive. No doubt about that even if it sacrifices the truth.
I am really surprised we have not heard anything about a hearing because I would think RS would want to go before the judge as soon as possible. jmo