Reader
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2004
- Messages
- 7,033
- Reaction score
- 108
Thank you! I hope everyone reads this full report of the 98 investigation.
New info of note to me: even Seasock told Scheffler "you can't walk away from the investigation'....where did that idea come from? did he know it was being suppressed? and we know they proceeded to do just that...case closed...WHY??
Seasock did not review, or did not see, Chambers' report...why not?? The investigator really grilled Seasock about what he knew compared to Chambers and himself and he did not have the full facts at all...so why was his advice accepted to close the case??
Why was the opinion of Seasock taken over Chambers' report? Was it more convenient to hear that he could not find JS to be a pedophile at age 50+? For whom and who influenced the case to be closed?
The report of change in demeanor of Sandusky when the mother questioned him...he came all excited to pick the boy up but became very quiet and non-responsive when she questioned him and told him not to call anymore...very revealing....
The mother was worried that JS knew which sliding doors were hers at the back of the apt....she wondered how he could tell the difference from other apts? Had he been watching the apt??
JS only called the son, not the daughter....
A lot of info here that tells me this case should not have been closed by DPW even if no charges, and the PSU staff should definitely have followed up with JS's behaviors...I don't care if they were not given the full report...Schultz knew enough about it to bring it to the rest of staff's attention....they could and should have asked for a copy if they really wanted to know what he was doing with children in the workplace facilities and they should have followed up...IMO
But nope, it was conveniently filed under 'admin info', case closed, we don't know nuthin' so we don't have to do nuthin', and quietly went the way of the wind....until it came back to howl thru PSU again...