Allison Baden-Clay - GENERAL DISCUSSION THREAD #33

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, there'd be no point. I don't think NBC would be the one talking. If there is any immunity being given {and we don't even know that} I'd hope it's only to someone who knows what happened, not someone who was involved in ANY way.

or to someone that knew what was going to happen, if premeditated?
 
Has it actually been established that anyone was offered immunity? The only place it was ever mentioned (as far as I can ascertain ) was in a Paul Tully blog ( which I can't locate); the same blog where he said 5 people were involved. This assertion was immediately refuted by the Qld Attorney General, although IMO the language used by the AG may have been a little ambiguous ( never say never type of thing while lambasting PT) thus leading to the speculation that someone was offered and accepted immunity. Reading all the posts over last few weeks it appears that an immunity deal has been accepted as a given by many posters. Will be happy to be wrong on this BTW.
I doubt if NBC or any other BC family member would have been offered immunity as they would have had to open their mouths and actually say something. TM could be a possibility, but if so would be to a lesser charge than murder or accessory IMO.

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/8482060/no-baden-clay-immunity-deal-queensland-ag
 
It wasnt until recently that I realised that most cases like this the PERP usually confesses after being blindsided by the detectives, they plant enough fear and are convincing in this tactic making the PERP fear that if he co-operates his sentence will be reduced. What worries me is that, he lawyered up on the day she sent missing and had a QC the day she was found, his legal team would have given him the upper hand on what to expect and told him to say nothing. Its not up to him to prove he didnt do it, its up to the police to prove he DID! There have been many high profile cases over the years with far more evidence pointing to the perp ( OJ for one) who then got off. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence, phone calls, internet searching etc, and I hope to god justice is done, but I really worry about how much evidence was washed away with her body in a creek during bad weather for so long and so far, no hard evidence( that we know of) Imagine if one of the posters on this sight was accused of such a crime and the police seized their computers and found web site searches about all the stuff covered here, and someone had a bad nose bleed in their car getting groceries out as well as had been having an affair ( apparantly one in 3 men cheat on their wives, I suspect this to be higher over a lifetime) topped of by one of the neighbours hearing an argument and the inlaws dont like the partner and partner goes driving around to look for said partner making calls and then didnt tell police for fear of being incriminated or because felt to blame they walked out and was distressed and blah blah. This stuff happens everyday (minus the murder) in every neighbourhood.I once heard about a case of a man getting aquited because the traces of blood that were eventually found splattered all over the bed through forensic testing had no impact as the wife had also given birth on the bed! People have been framing people for centuries and while I personally dont believe anyone has been framed here, I wouldnt be able to prove it, and the defense will have the right to speculate on every possible humanly conceivable notion of what could of happened. Husbands and wives have been yelling, belting, cheating and disliking family members since the day we were put on earth, sad but true, doesnt prove someone is a killer. Just my thoughts on this due to my fear that justice will not be served.

you bring up a few good thought. My thoughts though regards to OJ Simpson, he was a lot higher profile case, in a different Judicial system and while I can see the similarities you are talking about, I think the cases are totally different for some of the reasons I mentioned. My other thought, while I admit to some small concern about the alleged PERP getting off, I do believe the police may have alot more evidence than what we could possibly know and so its hard for us to make a judgement on how it will go, when we don't have the evidence they do. Looking at the photos of the luminol testing in the Captiva, in particular with the rear passenger door. That does not appear to be something that could be cause by a nose bleed, unless somehow you are kneeling in the backseat facing the door and smearing your nose on it. lol. I don't necessarily agree most PERPs in these cases will confess even if blindsided by detectives.. Just MOO though.

I choose to have faith in QPS and that justice will prevail, But I understand some of your sentiment.
 
It wasnt until recently that I realised that most cases like this the PERP usually confesses after being blindsided by the detectives, they plant enough fear and are convincing in this tactic making the PERP fear that if he co-operates his sentence will be reduced. What worries me is that, he lawyered up on the day she sent missing and had a QC the day she was found, his legal team would have given him the upper hand on what to expect and told him to say nothing. Its not up to him to prove he didnt do it, its up to the police to prove he DID! There have been many high profile cases over the years with far more evidence pointing to the perp ( OJ for one) who then got off. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence, phone calls, internet searching etc, and I hope to god justice is done, but I really worry about how much evidence was washed away with her body in a creek during bad weather for so long and so far, no hard evidence( that we know of) Imagine if one of the posters on this sight was accused of such a crime and the police seized their computers and found web site searches about all the stuff covered here, and someone had a bad nose bleed in their car getting groceries out as well as had been having an affair ( apparantly one in 3 men cheat on their wives, I suspect this to be higher over a lifetime) topped of by one of the neighbours hearing an argument and the inlaws dont like the partner and partner goes driving around to look for said partner making calls and then didnt tell police for fear of being incriminated or because felt to blame they walked out and was distressed and blah blah. This stuff happens everyday (minus the murder) in every neighbourhood.I once heard about a case of a man getting aquited because the traces of blood that were eventually found splattered all over the bed through forensic testing had no impact as the wife had also given birth on the bed! People have been framing people for centuries and while I personally dont believe anyone has been framed here, I wouldnt be able to prove it, and the defense will have the right to speculate on every possible humanly conceivable notion of what could of happened. Husbands and wives have been yelling, belting, cheating and disliking family members since the day we were put on earth, sad but true, doesnt prove someone is a killer. Just my thoughts on this due to my fear that justice will not be served.

Like you BG, I have a horror of the thought that dear Allison may not ever receive justice, whoever the perp is (and I feel fairly confident it is GBC) due to fancy lawyer footwork.

No disrespect to the legal profession (one of my sons is a corporate lawyer lol) and I know our legal system is probably better than any alternative yet devised at arriving at the truth, but still... just saying

:please:

JMO MOO
 
Like you BG, I have a horror of the thought that dear Allison may not ever receive justice, whoever the perp is (and I feel fairly confident it is GBC) due to fancy lawyer footwork.

No disrespect to the legal profession (one of my sons is a corporate lawyer lol) and I know our legal system is probably better than any alternative yet devised at arriving at the truth, but still... just saying

:please:

JMO MOO

This is my fear too... and what THEY are hoping for.
 
her post was deleted but many peopple responded to her comment, so her name will still be there in the other comments. I

Also, My friend heard this story about who the witness is, through someone at the brookfield school where her daughter goes. Squiz actually heard it FACE TO FACE. so I dont know if Squiz and I have the same woman. I am waiting to hear more specifics from my friend first. I am trying to help strengthen Squizzeys fact that he has reported to us, but not yet able to verify my friends story. TRYING.

Only just trying to catch up. I don't think we should be naming the person on the facebook page. They are a potential witness for all we know. (I know you aren't doing that here, I'm just saying). I have wondered if this person was in fact the person others have mentioned in regards to seeing NBC at the roundabout. It was never stated on QPS what they actually saw. But I do know the time was approx 12:30 am. (Facetime call was reported to be at 12:20am..interesting- but could be quite possibly unrelated)..
 
I wonder if the QPS website references should be deleted here, as that person could possibly be a witness now.
 
I wonder if the QPS website references should be deleted here, as that person could possibly be a witness now.

Yes.. I wonder if it should not even be linked to? I didn't want to say that and appear to be a real stickler, lol.. but maybe better to be safe than sorry.
 
Like you BG, I have a horror of the thought that dear Allison may not ever receive justice, whoever the perp is (and I feel fairly confident it is GBC) due to fancy lawyer footwork.

No disrespect to the legal profession (one of my sons is a corporate lawyer lol) and I know our legal system is probably better than any alternative yet devised at arriving at the truth, but still... just saying

:please:

JMO MOO
dont agree dear girl, probably because i dont want to, justice will prevail, they think they are clever but never underestimate the dets. and my bet is he will end up with a low profile inexperienced lawyer. the high flyers will get sick of his lies and BS and he will get his justice in the BIGhouse MOO
 
who are the 300 witness statements from. one is from the roundabout sighting and some of Allisons close friends but the others , can 300 Queenslanders be wrong
 
I'm not even sure why QPS leave other people's comments up referring to things they delete. I was watching the QPS website sometimes over those early days, and I saw another thing of interest they deleted, but they leave all these 'thanks ..... ..... , that could well be crucial etc' type comments up, which make it quite clear who made the initial comments. Not sure if I'm making sense lol.
 
dont agree dear girl, probably because i dont want to, justice will prevail, they think they are clever but never underestimate the dets. and my bet is he will end up with a low profile inexperienced lawyer. the high flyers will get sick of his lies and BS and he will get his justice in the BIGhouse MOO
:)
Hope you're right.
 
Oh Snap UT, I didn't want to be a killjoy either, but I think it's better to be safe. With facebook, it's just way too easy to track people I think, hence why I don't use it myself, unless I'm perving at someone else's.

By the way UT, whenever I see people calling you UT, I always think of UTI as in Urinary Tract Infection! Lol, no offence intended I assure you.
 
You guys made me feel a little bit guilty,but It'll all be ok.

I removed the link, but it is still available via peoples quotes.

In MOO I think they would have removed all the comments if it was important??
 
I'm not even sure why QPS leave other people's comments up referring to things they delete. I was watching the QPS website sometimes over those early days, and I saw another thing of interest they deleted, but they leave all these 'thanks ..... ..... , that could well be crucial etc' type comments up, which make it quite clear who made the initial comments. Not sure if I'm making sense lol.

I agree.. I was surprised after they made a point of deleting the persons post regarding this, that they did not remove ALL reference to the persons name.
 
You guys made me feel a little bit guilty,but It'll all be ok.

I removed the link, but it is still available via peoples quotes.

In MOO I think they would have removed all the comments if it was important??

AWW, hope you feel a little bit better soon. ;)

Didn't mean to make you feel guilty. We may be being overly cautious. But yes I think QPS should have removed ALL reference to the posters name.
 
Has it actually been established that anyone was offered immunity? The only place it was ever mentioned (as far as I can ascertain ) was in a Paul Tully blog ( which I can't locate); the same blog where he said 5 people were involved. This assertion was immediately refuted by the Qld Attorney General, although IMO the language used by the AG may have been a little ambiguous ( never say never type of thing while lambasting PT) thus leading to the speculation that someone was offered and accepted immunity. Reading all the posts over last few weeks it appears that an immunity deal has been accepted as a given by many posters. Will be happy to be wrong on this BTW.
I doubt if NBC or any other BC family member would have been offered immunity as they would have had to open their mouths and actually say something. TM could be a possibility, but if so would be to a lesser charge than murder or accessory IMO.

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/8482060/no-baden-clay-immunity-deal-queensland-ag

thats right, its never been stated, just rumour.
I was thinking about why NBC hasnt been arrested or anything yet, if he has in fact been implicated that night. And I wondered what everyone thought about that, and the fact he's not been granted visiting rights..just another thought popping in and out of my head :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
125
Guests online
748
Total visitors
873

Forum statistics

Threads
625,980
Messages
18,517,869
Members
240,919
Latest member
TheWretched50
Back
Top