- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 4,029
- Reaction score
- 220
So the court date in September, is that where they decide if there is enough evidence to go trial?
Committal hearing, yes. Round 1 for his barrister.
So the court date in September, is that where they decide if there is enough evidence to go trial?
Please do not misquote me. I said OW was in Brisbane on the 15th April. I did not say it was due to her brother having a baby. I said she announced the birth on the 18th.
Allison Baden-Clay - GENERAL DISCUSSION THREAD #33 - Page 60 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
http://www.artofeurope.com/eliot/eli2.htm
Because I have sworn off emoticons I offer you poetry.
no more possum eyes????????![]()
Allison's body was found on 30th April in the afternoon, does that sound right, can anyone tell me??
scratch that, it was in the morning according to this link:
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/...-enters-11th-day/story-e6freoof-1226342625074
Just imagine how prolific we would all become if there was information "drip fed" to us on a weekly basis. Just one morsel..... We would be like a a Sandgate seagull on a chip! "please sir, can I have some more?" how do other forum topics keep their momentum?
When this was first reported my fatherinlaw told me that his offsider knew someone in the QPS and apparently they had got GBC to the stage where he was unbuttoning his shirt at the house about to 'fess up when his legal rep came sweeping in and told him to button up his shirt and say nothing. Have no link nor substantiated evidence so guess this is where I put MOO.
OT have bad toothache - any reccommendations for a dentist in Cairns?
Police allege Ms McHugh said their relationship ended in October 2011, when Mrs Baden-Clay discovered the affair, but resumed in December of that year.
Police allege that Mr Baden-Clay stayed in contact with Ms McHugh after Mrs Baden-Clay's disappearance, using a pseudonym "Bruce Overland" in emails.
Earlier this month, Mr Baden-Clay was arrested and charged with Mrs Baden-Clay's murder and interfering with her body by moving her to the location where she was found.
Is this the part where we admit there is NOTHING new to say until the next trial date? And maybe we should resume our normal lives?
EEEEK I agree honey, and now I almost have had to face that 'real life' again, OMG the cat furballs are 4 inches thick on my wooden floors now.....!!
I give up.....:tears: :sheesh:
http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2012/04/30/1226343/140509-kholo-creek-bridge.jpg
this image definitely shows low tide. so obviously she was found during low tide. MOO of course
if she had washed down from upstream, then wouldn't it make sense that she would be higher up the bank? something gnawing at my brain, but I cant figure it out yet. It's not coming. If Allison's body came down the river during a downpour, how fast did this happen? the way it has been discussed, it always comes across to me like it was pretty fast.
BUT, when I picture her body moving from a high tide position (ie up higher along the bank), then I picture the very slow moving of the tide from high to low, and I picture her body, very very slowly, bobbing and eddying with the water as the tide lowers. I don't mean to paint a huge visual and graphic image here, but the two dont go together, and like I said, I don't know where I am going here with this, but I keep coming back to the bridge being the place she was left.
Does any of this make sense??
I have to admit that I've wondered the same thing... as the water goes down why would her body stay there? Then I thought if the place where she was, was level it would be less likely to move with the water. Not sure if that makes sense... like if it was level ground then the water could ease away without moving her?http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2012/04/30/1226343/140509-kholo-creek-bridge.jpg
this image definitely shows low tide. so obviously she was found during low tide. MOO of course
if she had washed down from upstream, then wouldn't it make sense that she would be higher up the bank? something gnawing at my brain, but I cant figure it out yet. It's not coming. If Allison's body came down the river during a downpour, how fast did this happen? the way it has been discussed, it always comes across to me like it was pretty fast.
BUT, when I picture her body moving from a high tide position (ie up higher along the bank), then I picture the very slow moving of the tide from high to low, and I picture her body, very very slowly, bobbing and eddying with the water as the tide lowers. I don't mean to paint a huge visual and graphic image here, but the two dont go together, and like I said, I don't know where I am going here with this, but I keep coming back to the bridge being the place she was left.
Does any of this make sense??
Think some reports said 11 am on 30th April.
Sorry hadn't read your link.
Snippets of interest - to me. Just a reminder as to what this particular media source published.
http://www.illawarramercury.com.au/...sition-police-allege/2604236.aspx?storypage=2
AMY REMEIKIS
26 Jun, 2012 04:09 PM
WOW Summer......this last comment "moving the body to where it was last found" is big!! it would indicate she was 'dumped' at the bridge. I understand you cant always believe what the papers and MSM tell you (especially when the CM are involved. MOO MOO)
Minni are you suggesting we should check the water levels for 30th April in the morning
and compare to the water levels we saw??????
I thought so too Minni.
Caution: It's the only article in which I have seen that particular wording.