- Joined
- Jul 1, 2005
- Messages
- 1,055
- Reaction score
- 477
It's never understandable for any person to be removed from the missing person list unless they are found, point blank period. From the looks of Michelle's family, they didn't have the resources to make noise. They were convinced by the police and social workers (which gives me clues that they were receiving assistance) that Michelle may have left on her own. I don't think they might have wondered where she was, but they weren't a close family in the first place so I'm sure some doubt was left.
OT: I think when people do not have a strong family unit, things like this slip through the cracks easier. The case that comes to mind is Joyce Vincent which was a tragedy in itself.
exactly my point. Michelle slipped through the cracks because she didn't have the family behind her.
Honestly how do we take anything her mother claims as fact- she says she knew her daughter didn't runaway but she didn't tell Michelle's brother she was missing?
But it was reasonable for LE to see her as someone who left on her own, she had family dysfunction, just lost her son and was an adult.
Should she have been removed from the list? In retrospect no- but looking at it from a logical and practical point of view I see why she was-
It is so easy to see what LE "should" have done and point to the mistakes they make-But I think if people had to make those judgment calls they'd have a different perspective-