I was just reading over some more of the tweet points of Crini's summation.
He views the calumnia as a strategy which was tweaked and developed over time.
He says Knox needed to add material to the calumnia, so she blended in bits of the truth (basketball courts, a black man, going to the cottage, an assault, a scream).
He accuses her of adding "dreamlike components": The blood she saw on Raffaele's hands (from the fish?). Crini says this a device.
He says Knoxs calunnia is a strategy protracted over time - developed stealthily.
Anyone not sold on innocence know what he is getting at? Does it hold up?
He views the calumnia as a strategy which was tweaked and developed over time.
He says Knox needed to add material to the calumnia, so she blended in bits of the truth (basketball courts, a black man, going to the cottage, an assault, a scream).
He accuses her of adding "dreamlike components": The blood she saw on Raffaele's hands (from the fish?). Crini says this a device.
He says Knoxs calunnia is a strategy protracted over time - developed stealthily.
Anyone not sold on innocence know what he is getting at? Does it hold up?