Amanda posted new transcripts from December hearings:
http://www.amandaknox.com/2014/01/08/kercher-knox-closing-arguments/
http://www.amandaknox.com/2014/01/08/kercher-knox-closing-arguments/
You have a right to ask for a plausible explanation.I want to understand. So they shut down the video they watched and decide "time to prank a robbery prank on poor Meredith". Where is Guede in all this? Do they meet him on the way by accident? OK, let's say the guy barely knows the two girls but agrees to join in. Now what? They enter and Guede suddenly rapes Meredith?
I'm not asking for much. I just want to see something plausible psychologically. Maybe I'm asking for too much.
Here's the actual Skype interview with Meo Ponte published today.
http://www.repubblica.it/cronaca/2014/01/09/news/l_ultima_battaglia_di_amanda_knox_stavolta_sar_assolta_poi_incontrer_i_genitori_di_meredith-75463481/
It doesn't make the staging theory stronger.
Having some experience in staging burglaries she would have at least staged the theft of the laptops. JMO.![]()
You have a right to ask for a plausible explanation.
What I can imagine is a prank, perhaps thought about in the afternoon with AK and RS, and then later, Guede is invited in. They mean it as a joke, but it is Meredith's unanticipated rage which perhaps fuels a drugged-up feeling of humiliation which seems to them to be unbearable (in that moment).
Can someone tell me how to do Google translate on this? TIA.
I am recalling how Guede talked about MK complaining and shouting that Amanda had stolen her money-- It may have been a prank; Amanda may have planned to give the money back and was caught off guard by Meredith's anger (she did have her period; maybe she was feeling poorly and not receptive to a prank)....and I read in Burleigh's book how Amanda kept pranking her father-- all of this is actually profoundly sad.![]()
Even the dumbest stager would know to take the laptops that were in full view.But we don't know what they "took" and didn't take in the "prank burglary," In her response to the comment, she says they messed stuff up....kind of like the way they messed stuff up in Filomena's room without actually taking anything.
And then Meredith's remark to her sister about how they argued (earlier the afternoon of the murder), though I'm not sure if that is true or not, but it was in that book which you quoted yesterday....Follain.
BBM - good insight. Because she was used to doing this with her father (sad that it was necessary; he must have been a negligent father) and it would seem natural to, as you say, try and lighten the mood.If MK and AK had been battling as suggested by her sister, maybe AK thought pulling a prank would lighten that mood. When MK didn't think it was funny, AK may have felt slighted for making the effort to make amends.
They could easily have met RG as he was walking to the clubs and invited him in for a drug purchase. They had not planned on being free that night so may have needed to make a purchase. Of course just my speculation...but wow, SMK, that sure puts another twist on things. Thanks for posting it.
It seems to me you will twist and interpret against her everything she or anyone says. That's what is left when the actual case the Perugians concocted is garbage. JMO.
Yes - that is all quite true.
And you also have to recall what Guede said, about Meredith getting into a quite angry state because she couldn't find the rent money - if Amanda intended it as a joke, and then Meredith reacted in a way which Amanda had not anticipated, and you throw some drugs and drinking in, it could have been a fatal mix.
It certainly makes more psychological sense than Crini's unflushed toilet fight :notgood:
Yes - and as Myvice points out, the argument of the afternoon may have made Amanda think that a prank was in order: To me, pranks are passive-aggressive. They seek to lighten the mood, but also poke at the person a bit. And sometimes the recipient reacts with rage - which is quite humiliating to the pranker, I would imagine.And then Meredith's remark to her sister about how they argued (earlier the afternoon of the murder), though I'm not sure if that is true or not, but it was in that book which you quoted yesterday....Follain.
No, of course it doesn't make sense. It would be tragic; truly a human tragedy - a terrible prank-gone-awry, which brought out the worst in the participants, and brought to a head and unleashed things which had never been intended. Think of Hamlet and Horatio, putting on the play for Claudius. And then Hamlet stabs Polonius and almost rapes his mother.
BBM - good insight. Because she was used to doing this with her father (sad that it was necessary; he must have been a negligent father) and it would seem natural to, as you say, try and lighten the mood.
And all the more humiliating if Meredith became even MORE angry. To me, all the pieces fall into place with this idea. For the first time, Rudy's story about Meredith's anger - which Guede seemed to be awkwardly listening to - has a basis in reality. And to think, Crini has only the unflushed toilet theory, while this key of key, this light of lights has escaped him :tears:
But we are saying the same thing :giggle: We are both saying that Amanda took the rent money as a "staged prank" , and perhaps almost a pathetic way to get Meredith's love and attention, as she did with her Dad. And then Meredith blows up, and now the humiliation is beyond bearing. Aren't we arguing the same theory, aa9511?Very perceptive.
Personally, I still think it began as a sort of teasing of Meredith, which she didn't respond well to and it annoyed her, and it escalated from there.
But your theory also makes a lot of sense.
Not true. See Filomena's testimony.
Mayhap....mayhap :waitasec: But let's not worry about it. "Heaven will direct it. "It would be demolished in court faster than you can say "Mignini is an old pervert". No testimony from sister or British girls about any tension. Than we're back to the usual lack of credible timeline and forensic evidence.
Yes - and as Myvice points out, the argument of the afternoon may have made Amanda think that a prank was in order: To me, pranks are passive-aggressive. They seek to lighten the mood, but also poke at the person a bit. And sometimes the recipient reacts with rage - which is quite humiliating to the pranker, I would imagine.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.