OTTO!!!!:loveyou::loveyou::loveyou:La Nazione ‏@qn_lanazione 28m
Process Meredith, Raffaele Sollecito in the courtroom trying out video projector
La Nazione @ qn_lanazione 24s
Meredith process, hearing begins soon
OTTO!!!!:loveyou::loveyou::loveyou:La Nazione ‏@qn_lanazione 28m
Process Meredith, Raffaele Sollecito in the courtroom trying out video projector
La Nazione @ qn_lanazione 24s
Meredith process, hearing begins soon
omg :tears: I am SO sorry to hear this!!!!! :tears:thanks, otto, for the tweets !! we can always count on you :great:
and thanks smk for the ones you just added !
OT: my dad died unexpectedly yesterday. i'm still in shock. mom found him in bed with no pulse/no respirations. he had a DNR so that was that! if my brain (posting) is scattered for the next little while, please bear with me. thanks![]()
thanks, otto, for the tweets !! we can always count on you :great:
and thanks smk for the ones you just added !
OT: my dad died unexpectedly yesterday. i'm still in shock. mom found him in bed with no pulse/no respirations. he had a DNR so that was that! if my brain (posting) is scattered for the next little while, please bear with me. thanks![]()
I think I've heard enough. Knox, a "strong woman", was "perceived" as the stronger personality of the two (Sollecito) so she was automatically blamed. Once sights were set on her, there was no changing direction for the prosecutor. The lawyer came out swinging with her "tunnel vision" argument, and I suspect that it will deteriorate from here.
thanks, otto, for the tweets !! we can always count on you :great:
and thanks smk for the ones you just added !
OT: my dad died unexpectedly yesterday. i'm still in shock. mom found him in bed with no pulse/no respirations. he had a DNR so that was that! if my brain (posting) is scattered for the next little while, please bear with me. thanks![]()
thanks, otto, for the tweets !! we can always count on you :great:
and thanks smk for the ones you just added !
OT: my dad died unexpectedly yesterday. i'm still in shock. mom found him in bed with no pulse/no respirations. he had a DNR so that was that! if my brain (posting) is scattered for the next little while, please bear with me. thanks![]()
La Nazione @ 1m qn_lanazione
Process Meredith, lawyer Bongiorno (Sollecito): "Against Amanda and Raffaele, a horde of sans-culottes" [people without privilege and rights; lower class common people (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/522646/sansculotte)
Andrea Vogt ‏@andreavogt 1m
Bongiorno: Perugia declared "case closed" 4 days after Kercher murder, w/no murder weapon and a motive intended to calm public fear.
Could be but do we even know if that picture was taken at the cottage or was it taken at a friends house? It would still leave me questioning why she would borrow the lamp being as she had an overhead light and a lamp of her own.
I think I've heard enough. Knox, a "strong woman", was "perceived" as the stronger personality of the two (Sollecito) so she was automatically blamed. Once sights were set on her, there was no changing direction for the prosecutor. The lawyer came out swinging with her "tunnel vision" argument, and I suspect that it will deteriorate from here.
thanks, otto, for the tweets !! we can always count on you :great:
and thanks smk for the ones you just added !
OT: my dad died unexpectedly yesterday. i'm still in shock. mom found him in bed with no pulse/no respirations. he had a DNR so that was that! if my brain (posting) is scattered for the next little while, please bear with me. thanks![]()
A small wound would not necessarily have sprayed blood everywhere, simply binding it with a cloth would minimize blood loss. In any case, the only evidence would be his say so if no blood was found. Maybe he didn't cut himself at all, or the wound was minor.
Also, not all the deposited blood was/would have been tested, so in most cases they would have blood but not necessarily DNA confirmation of who it belonged to. They would not have been looking for someone else's blood, and I expect they assumed any blood there was MKs.
I think you guys have an unrealistic expectation of how blood is spread around on a crime scene. Mostly it is going to be around the victim, or where the victim had been after being wounded. The victim, after all, is the one losing blood, not the perp. The perp is probably going to wipe their hands after the act, so not much transfer is likely through that route unless they flee in a hurry. Most of what there is would be tracked by their feet/shoes, as that is more difficult to clean since they have to walk.
Hi Amber
That photo of Meredith was taken at a club. I was not referring to that particular photo as taken at the cottage. I just posted it as a reference of what she was wearing on Halloween.
I think she may have taken other photos at the cottage before heading out for the night. The photos may have been on her phone and may have never been published for the public.
My son and daughter, both in the same age bracket as Meredith and in college, take pics of themselves all the time with their phones particularly for a special event where they are dressed up. The same goes for their friends. It is a common thing to do.
My kids are also notorious for not putting things back where they belong and leaving items at the spot where they used them. At any rate, I found the theory interesting and plausible.
:seeya:
thanks, otto, for the tweets !! we can always count on you :great:
and thanks smk for the ones you just added !
OT: my dad died unexpectedly yesterday. i'm still in shock. mom found him in bed with no pulse/no respirations. he had a DNR so that was that! if my brain (posting) is scattered for the next little while, please bear with me. thanks![]()
His say-so? but I thought he never said so, and they have a picture of him with a large gash on one finger which looks like a cut which healed recently?
I am certain that cut is from the murder.
I understand what you are saying about it wouldn't have been a lot of blood, he could have wrapped his finger in something, yes, I agree with all of that.....but then how did he manage to not only close, but lock 2 doors, leaving no evidence of any blood around those doorknobs/doors? Because I would think he would have used whatever hand was not cut, thus he would have to control the keys, lock the doors, everything with one hand, in the meantime not getting a drop of anything anywhere on the door. I don't know, it just, to me, it seems pretty much like someone cleaned up something.
Yes, you are right about that most of the blood would be around the victim and mostly only the shoes are going to track blood, I see what you are saying.
so no one remembers where we discussed the "sack of ****" comment?
the review by mark mentions several of his errors: http://www.amazon.com/Death-Italy-D...?ie=UTF8&filterBy=addOneStar&showViewpoints=0
amanda translated part of the kercher's attorneys closing arguments... it's ridiculous nonsense. one of the arguments is something like:
"even if the dna on the knife is not MK's, it is the dna of someone who's throat was cut with the knife"
what??!!
more @ http://www.amandaknox.com/2014/01/08/kercher-knox-closing-arguments/