Amanda Knox tried for the murder of Meredith Kercher in Italy *NEW TRIAL*#13

[Linda7NJ]

<modsnip>

http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/Other_DNA_Evidence

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[TorisMom003]

Has this been posted yet?

http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/

 

[otto]

All the more reason then IMO to test for prints made in Meredith's bedroom before she had a chance to dilute them.

I'm still confused, as the blood evidence in the bedroom was clearly visible. Although there may have been another print or two that were not clearly visible, I don't understand how that would add to the information that police need to understand what happened. For example, there is the print on the pillow case that was attributed to Knox, but the Massei Report does not make a decision about that print, stating that it is not necessary because there are ample barefoot prints belonging to Knox in other parts of the cottage. Knox is placed at the scene, so it doesn't matter if she was wearing shoes in the bedroom.

 

[Linda7NJ]

Has this been posted yet?



http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/

Yes, I use it and post from it often


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Harmony 2]

After she was dead?

IED the scream was followed almost immediately by the sound of footsteps running by ear wtiness.

After a scream so loud a
neighbor heard, Meredith is laying there bleeding out, Rudy waited around a bit....then moved her to sexually assault her?

IMO the scream occurred, the knife to silence her, followed almost immediately by running out the door makes more sense to me. It lines up better with everything else.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

When was she raped in your scenario? His bloody handprint and footprints were on the pillow which was under her, when did those get there?

Page 137
The inhalation probably lasted around ten minutes (according to what could be inferred from the fact that at the alveolar level a concentration of particular cells was found microscopically), and thus the death throes of the subject from the moment of the stabbing which caused the largest wound lasted at most fifteen minutes, followed by death.

Massei report:
http://truejustice.org/ee/documents/perugia/TheMasseiReport.pdf

 

[Linda7NJ]

All the more reason then IMO to test for prints made in Meredith's bedroom before she had a chance to dilute them.

Why?
We already know Meredith bled to death there, and we know she is the source of the copious amounts of blood. IMO the movement going on OUTSIDE of the murder room is more important. Far more important.
We have bloody bare footprints from Amanda AND Raff. Mixed blood samples in the bathroom Amanda admits to using...and bleeding in.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[otto]

Yes, I use it and post from it often


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There's a small difficult to recognize distinction. The original wiki has the word "the" at the beginning. This other site is something else. The links go directly to the InjusticeinPerugia website, so that is where it originates.

 

[Harmony 2]

Reminder
* copying and pasting verbatim from opinion sites or from blogs is not allowed

 

[Linda7NJ]

When was she raped in your scenario? His bloody handprint and footprints were on the pillow which was under her, when did those get there?







Massei report:

http://truejustice.org/ee/documents/perugia/TheMasseiReport.pdf

I believe she was moved way after by either Amanda or Raff as evidenced by her shoulder, still wearing her bra. imprinted in blood, on the floor.

I believe one them placed the pillow under her to make the sexual assault MORE blatantly obvious as part of their staging. I believe RS cut her bra off as part of the staging to point to one killer, a rapist that broke in. That's why the hallway blood was cleaned up. That's why the window was broken after the scene was staged.
The only person on the planet that would have a reason to clean that hallway was Amanda Knox.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Harmony 2]

If you do not want to visit a site that is your prerogative, don't click on the links, but please refrain from getting into the site wars discussion again.

 

[sherlockh]

LOL! Oh, yeah that's right. So let's add two more:

"I might be just imagining things."
"Everything feels like it's not real - just a flashback."

And,

"I have an overactive imagination."

Just search for the word 'imagine'. I can't quote, but the testimony is all about imagining and she even imagines what the police was imagining. I can't imagine any objective person would think Knox is telling the truth here. JMO.
http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/Amanda_Knox's_Testimony

 

[Linda7NJ]

There's a small difficult to recognize distinction. The original wiki has the word "the" at the beginning. This other site is something else. The links go directly to the InjusticeinPerugia website, so that is where it originates.

Ooooh. I didn't look closely. I thought they were one in the same. I didn't look closely.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[otto]

Ooooh. I didn't look closely. I thought they were one in the same. I didn't look closely.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think that's the idea.

 

[aa9511]

I see ... thanks. So the idea is that Knox stepped on the bloody footprint on the bathmat several times with a wet foot, and then she tracked blood throughout the cottage? If we look at the huge pool of blood in the bedroom, and how quickly Guede's prints faded, I think it's unlikely that Knox stepped on the bathmat blood with a wet foot and then made so many prints. Guede's prints required a huge pool of blood, and Knox's prints only required stepping on a bloody print to create pretty much the same number of prints?

Yes, I agree. Plus, if the blood on the faucet was caked dry, the "blood" on the mat would have been dry by that time too. I use quotations b/c I don't even think writing "blood" is apppropriate b/c it is just like, a stain of blood. Stain would be the more accurate word, IMO. I don't know how somehow can step on a stain of blood, the blood becomes "alive" again, covers the whole bottom of feet or foot, and then lasts for many footprints!!

 

[MichaelSmith]

Has this been posted yet?

http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/

Thanks for posting that. There was a tweet about it from Injustice Anywhere and I saw it linked to elsewhere. They say it's a work in progress.

https://twitter.com/NJusticAnywhere

Injustice Anywhere &#8207;@NJusticAnywhere 18h
Advocates Look To Correct Misleading Information Presented By Anti-Amanda Knox WIkipedia Style Website

 

[SMK]

Yes, I use it and post from it often


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, Linda, this is a second one. The original wiki was comprised by posters from PMF and TJMK - this link is a new wiki called murderofmeredithkercher.com (as Otto said, they drop the "The") and is from posters at Injustice in Perugia. It refutes the other wiki that you post from. Just clarifying , as it is confusing now! :scared:

 

[SMK]

I think that's the idea.

Right, that is the very crux of the site, and it states this as its purpose. (to refute point by point)

 

[Amber29]

If you do not want to visit a site that is your prerogative, don't click on the links, but please refrain from getting into the site wars discussion again.

Thank you I never enjoy the fight over the sites. I do have to say though I wish certain terms weren't allowed when describing sites one disagrees with such as "fake wiki" "hate site" and so on, as it only seems to happens in describing a couple sites that happen to share the same opinion.

 

[aa9511]

How are we sure that those are BLOODY footprints, because they tested + with luminol and -with TMB? That's a stretch and faulty scientific reasoning. As I've said before, additional test should have been performed before making that claim or am I missing something here?

It is not a stretch, IMO. Why is Luminol used in crime scenes at all, if the probability of it being blood or grapefruit juice or beet juice or rust or bleach, is all the same??!!

 

[SMK]

Thank you I never enjoy the fight over the sites. I do have to say though I wish certain terms weren't allowed when describing sites one disagrees with such as "fake wiki" "hate site" and so on, as it only seems to happens in describing a couple sites that happen to share the same opinion.

Nor do I; I have just been trying to clarify with my recent posts as there may be some confusion. I agree with what you say: There is a pro-innocence wiki and a pro-guilt wiki but "hate site" and "fake" are not terms which should be used, IMO :moo: