Angelina Jolie

[Marthatex]

One thing is for certain - any thread entitled Angelina Jolie is going to stir up some strong opinions!:crazy:

For the record, I really like Jennifer and Brad and Angelina.

Am I detecting just a tad bit of jealousy here and there?......Oh, no, no, no; who would be jealous of Angelina? Not me....

 

[reportertype]

I love Jen. Always have. Brad is OK, I think he's probably a good guy; he just doesn't ring my bell as much as he does other womens'. LOL! I think Angelina is just gorgeous! Especially when she's not super skinny.

 

[LillyRush]

All 3 of them are likeable in their own way, imo. The thing about Brad is that he is one of those guys who tends to almost become exactly like whomever he is dating, instead of developing his own personality, like going along with a fad - the fad being whatever his partner is doing. I believe there was even an article about this at some point during the years between his relationship with Gwyneth Paltrow and current relationship with AJ. There were even some physical characterisitics, like hair and clothing, that he seemed to change according to whomever he is with.

Anyway, I always thought that was strange, since he tries to come off as such an individualistic, rebellious kind of guy. So, who knows how long he will be interested in the whole fatherly and saving the world thing. Of course, people can change. I'm just saying, he seems to only change when it is directly related to his romantic interest of the moment. I hate saying that, making him sound shallow and so on, because I really liked him quite a bit years ago when I was in college.

 

[Floh]

I hope they are together for the rest of their lives for the sake of the children.

 

[deanws]

I hope they are together for the rest of their lives for the sake of the children.

I do too. While I can't stand either of them in their movies, those children are really cute! For the sake of the children, let's hope they do last.

 

[Ticamom]

I hope they are together for the rest of their lives for the sake of the children.

Me too. The children deserve to have a mommy and daddy to raise them together. So let's hope it lasts.

I also hope that Jen A. will find her soul mate and find happiness and raise her own family.

 

[believe09]

This is one of the nastiest threads I have read in a while. Really mean and extremely judgemental. uck

I agree with you, but it is a place to vent lol...I am have no true feeling about either of them in terms of their talent-I think they are inhumanely beautiful and very magnetic...I love how they polarize people and the media however! Any attention they can bring to worthy causes is welcome, and I am not familiar with any other celebrity that up and moved to a devastated area like New Orleans, knowing perfectly well that just their presence would bring revenue and notice to the city.

 

[TheShadow]

I just wonder about AJ having more "natural" children. She has stated in more than one interview that she is less attached to, and protective towards, her birth daughter than her adopted children. She referred to her as "a blob", and said she had no personality, and was "less vulnerable" than her adopted kids, or something like that. If that's how she feels, maybe she should stick to adoption.

 

[deanws]

I just wonder about AJ having more "natural" children. She has stated in more than one interview that she is less attached to, and protective towards, her birth daughter than her adopted children. She referred to her as "a blob", and said she had no personality, and was "less vulnerable" than her adopted kids, or something like that. If that's how she feels, maybe she should stick to adoption.

I agree. It is so sad for ANY child to be thought of this way.

 

[Only4Justice]

I just wonder about AJ having more "natural" children. She has stated in more than one interview that she is less attached to, and protective towards, her birth daughter than her adopted children. She referred to her as "a blob", and said she had no personality, and was "less vulnerable" than her adopted kids, or something like that. If that's how she feels, maybe she should stick to adoption.

when Angelina said that about Shiloh, the baby was only about 6 months old. I don't think she meant it the way it sounded. I think she was just already used to the way toddlers move about and was comparing Shiloh to that. And, perhaps, Shiloh is less vulnerable than her adopted children, since she is their biological child.

Back to the thread....Has it been confirmed that she is pregnant??? I haven't read much about the SAG awards, but didn't she have on a big puffy dress?

 

[Marthatex]

I just wonder about AJ having more "natural" children. She has stated in more than one interview that she is less attached to, and protective towards, her birth daughter than her adopted children. She referred to her as "a blob", and said she had no personality, and was "less vulnerable" than her adopted kids, or something like that. If that's how she feels, maybe she should stick to adoption.

I think this is a good example of the media taking statements out of context, misconstruing what she probably meant.

I think she was trying to go out of her way to show that she is just as attached to her adoptive children as her natural one.

When the baby first comes out it takes a while to bond, form that close attachment. Takes awhile to form a personality. (Take it from me, mine screamed for 3 months; it's difficult)

When you see a child in an orphanage, without parents, there might be a more immediate emotion there.

The entertainment mags are dying for a star to say something ambiguous so they can take it and run.... and they do.

That's why most of the stars, if you look at what they say now to interviewers - it usually means absolutely nothing.

 

[Amraann]

I just wonder about AJ having more "natural" children. She has stated in more than one interview that she is less attached to, and protective towards, her birth daughter than her adopted children. She referred to her as "a blob", and said she had no personality, and was "less vulnerable" than her adopted kids, or something like that. If that's how she feels, maybe she should stick to adoption.

I think that is taken out of context. I think the ref ... to Shiloh being a blog was more like ... she was a baby and not as active as the others..
Ang's comments about Shiloh were to indicate that she was not ever going to have to struggle with being an outcast..
In every article ever written its always stated that the other children are adopted.

 

[Marthatex]

I think that is taken out of context. I think the ref ... to Shiloh being a blog was more like ... she was a baby and not as active as the others..
Ang's comments about Shiloh were to indicate that she was not ever going to have to struggle with being an outcast..
In every article ever written its always stated that the other children are adopted.

agree - I just posted at the same time as you.

 

[Amraann]

agree - I just posted at the same time as you.

Yeah... and you even worded it better!!! :blowkiss:

 

[Marthatex]

Yeah... and you even worded it better!!! :blowkiss:

Aw, shucks; but you're more succinct! :blowkiss:

 

[JinxieJada]

Twins-I'd like to see how well her figure bounces back from that.

not impossible - members here have seen my pics after 3 kiddos - couldn't tell I've had any.


I love AJ - she's freaking awesome - doesn't care what anyone else has to say and lives it "Her" way. A very strong woman IMO. Her comment about kiddo being a blob I can understand. She's adopted TODDLERS - ie, interactive, doing things, babbling etc. Some people just don't like the baby phase. I'm one of em. I was sooo lost with my third. My mom had always loved the "baby" phase and would be content rocking in a chair ALL day long... but didn't like the toddler phase which is the one I love. To me my 3rd was the hardest for that reason,(my mom wasn't around and I was "on my own") and you know...she was sort of like a blob - newborns/infants don't interact with you the way a toddler does, they eat, poop, cry, and sleep, then the cycle repeats itself LOL. she getting ready to turn 2 now and it is soooooooooooooooooo much better/easier/fun, even though it's more challenging than a newborn/infant could ever be, I'd rather have 20 toddlers than 20 infants! Just MO though - some prefer the other way around!

 

[Floh]

I think this is a good example of the media taking statements out of context, misconstruing what she probably meant.

I think she was trying to go out of her way to show that she is just as attached to her adoptive children as her natural one.

When the baby first comes out it takes a while to bond, form that close attachment. Takes awhile to form a personality. (Take it from me, mine screamed for 3 months; it's difficult)

When you see a child in an orphanage, without parents, there might be a more immediate emotion there.

The entertainment mags are dying for a star to say something ambiguous so they can take it and run.... and they do.

That's why most of the stars, if you look at what they say now to interviewers - it usually means absolutely nothing.

:clap: :clap: :clap:

 

[Floh]

I think that is taken out of context. I think the ref ... to Shiloh being a blog was more like ... she was a baby and not as active as the others..
Ang's comments about Shiloh were to indicate that she was not ever going to have to struggle with being an outcast..
In every article ever written its always stated that the other children are adopted.

:clap: :clap: :clap:

 

[deanws]

when Angelina said that about Shiloh, the baby was only about 6 months old. I don't think she meant it the way it sounded. I think she was just already used to the way toddlers move about and was comparing Shiloh to that. And, perhaps, Shiloh is less vulnerable than her adopted children, since she is their biological child.

Back to the thread....Has it been confirmed that she is pregnant??? I haven't read much about the SAG awards, but didn't she have on a big puffy dress?

Yes, an UGLY brown wrinkled tie-dyed tent. It was AWFUL!!!! Her hair was pretty and she looks nice with a little meat on her face and arms.

 

[Floh]

Yes, an UGLY brown wrinkled tie-dyed tent. It was AWFUL!!!! Her hair was pretty and she looks nice with a little meat on her face and arms.

Hee, i LOVED the dress!!!

http://www.imnotobsessed.com/2008/01/27/isnt-that-a-loose-dress/33581/

isn't it nice how people have different likes and dislikes? :blowkiss: :blowkiss: :blowkiss:

it also keeps people guessing, which was probably the object of the wearing.