Anthony Family Spokesman Resigns/Is Fired *all threads merged*

There was a RUMOR of $200,000. If the $6,500 was a commission paid to LG, who was the remainder of the money paid to? NBC did not mention more money in their email nor did they contradict Cindy's claim that the Anthonys were not paid.

They most likely only paid $6,500 for the photos. The contract they signed with the spokesperson probably enabled him to strike the deal. If it didn't happen the way Cindy says and how NBC responded why isn't the spokesperson saying this was the agreement and how I was being paid? He clearly cashed the check. I find his quitting because of erratic behaviour to be thin.

Now the cynic in me also says Cindy's real beef with this is if NBC wrote a check for $6500.00 supposedly to the Anthony's, what is that conflicting with? What contract or deal that is suppose to be exclusive would that put them in conflict with.

If she would pocket $200 in the middle of that chaos, I would think she would want her $6500.00 back. But the email didn't say we haven't received our check, what do you mean LG got the check already?
 
Good point, CW. Nejame and the Anthonys have denied receiving any payment, why would they put this out in the public if it was a commission fee? Both NBC and LG would have documentation to prove otherwise if that were the case.

There is a subtle difference in that I had heard that monies were going into a Trust for dispersal, so that would enable any party to deny they are being paid directly.

I think the concern was that LG arranged for his commission directly with NBC, it did not go through the A accounting trust.

I don't see an issue with LG getting a commission, it isn't exactly getting paid but rewarded for results. I am confused how this whole thing is supposed to work with everyone claiming pro bono and the A's so bent out of shape at anyone making a $ they did not control, authorize and, disperse.

'A' dictatorship.
 
First, MN said that if the A were given any $ he would no longer represent them. The evening spent with NG grilling him made MN look into any funding. I wouldn't be surprised if CA did sign something and she is lying to MN about the existence of any written documentation. I wouldn't believe a thing that came out of CA mouth.

Secondly, ok, let's say (hypothetically) the A were lied to by G. Oh, my goodness. CA has been lying since "day one" about everything. She stumbles over her own lies. Then she becomes angry because the public doesn't believe her.

Finally, does CA really believe that everyone works for free? Do they really think that you can conduct your life without getting anything in writing?

This situation just reinforces that old saying, "what goes around, comes around."

Wonder if NG will talk about all of this tonight?

Tomorrow is another day.

BeagleMom
 
They most likely only paid $6,500 for the photos. The contract they signed with the spokesperson probably enabled him to strike the deal. If it didn't happen the way Cindy says and how NBC responded why isn't the spokesperson saying this was the agreement and how I was being paid? He clearly cashed the check. I find his quitting because of erratic behaviour to be thin.

Now the cynic in me also says Cindy's real beef with this is if NBC wrote a check for $6500.00 supposedly to the Anthony's, what is that conflicting with? What contract or deal that is suppose to be exclusive would that put them in conflict with.

If she would pocket $200 in the middle of that chaos, I would think she would want her $6500.00 back. But the email didn't say we haven't received our check, what do you mean LG got the check already?

It definitely sounds like LG pulled a fast one. I believe that only $6,500 changed hands and that the Anthonys had no knowledge the LG had received any payment.

As for the $200, I think everyone is making too big a deal about that. I'd have taken the $200 rather than have LE stick it in a yellow envelope until Casey was released. Lee said in his statement that Cindy opined that it could be Amy's money. We have no knowledge of what Cindy did with the money, she could have given it to Amy, or she could have kept it. It's not like Casey didn't owe her too.
 
It definitely sounds like LG pulled a fast one. I believe that only $6,500 changed hands and that the Anthonys had no knowledge the LG had received any payment.

As for the $200, I think everyone is making too big a deal about that. I'd have taken the $200 rather than have LE stick it in a yellow envelope until Casey was released. Lee said in his statement that Cindy opined that it could be Amy's money. We have no knowledge of what Cindy did with the money, she could have given it to Amy, or she could have kept it. It's not like Casey didn't owe her too.

The Anthony's being in financial straights has been a very common and reoccuring theme, even stated by George in his interview. I have defended a lot of things Cindy has done, but the taking the money is really off to me.
 
First, MN said that if the A were given any $ he would no longer represent them. The evening spent with NG grilling him made MN look into any funding.

Secondly, ok, let's say (hypothetically) the A were lied to by G. Oh, my goodness. CA has been lying since "day one" about everything. She stumbles over her own lies. Then she becomes angry because the public doesn't believe her.

Finally, does CA really believe that everyone works for free? Do they really think that you can conduct your life without getting anything in writing?

This situation just reinforces that old saying, "what goes around, comes around."

Wonder if NG will talk about all of this tonight?

Tomorrow is another day.

BeagleMom
:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:


I would like to add that Cindy said Lying isn't against the law. And then there was the comment she made about *mistruths*
Cindy wants it both ways. Sorry it doesn't work that way!
 
There is a subtle difference in that I had heard that monies were going into a Trust for dispersal, so that would enable any party to deny they are being paid directly.

I think the concern was that LG arranged for his commission directly with NBC, it did not go through the A accounting trust.

I don't see an issue with LG getting a commission, it isn't exactly getting paid but rewarded for results. I am confused how this whole thing is supposed to work with everyone claiming pro bono and the A's so bent out of shape at anyone making a $ they did not control, authorize and, disperse.

'A' dictatorship.

That is not the case at all. It was not a commission. It was payment for the photos. They Anthonys did not authorize LG to sell the photos and apparently believed they were providing them to NBC for free. LG decided to get a little side action without their knowledge, so to speak.
 
I wish I could be there on the day when Cindy gets her "just desserts" because some day she is going to have to pay the piper, and that Piper can not be fooled; He will not buy her crap. What an awful woman!! In her e-mail to the NBC person "I'm going to have Mark go after someone..." like he is a pit-bull or something. That's what she is! A pit-bull! In this case the (rotten) apple did not fall far from the tree, Cindy and Casey are two peas in a pod!!!! It is not hard to imagine how Casey could have turned out as messed up as she did, she took lessons from a truly disturbed individual.

Word to anyone around CA, be afraid, be very afraid, and if possible, RUN far away as fast as you can!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
That is not the case at all. It was not a commission. It was payment for the photos. They Anthonys did not authorize LG to sell the photos and apparently believed they were providing them to NBC for free. LG decided to get a little side action without their knowledge, so to speak.

Whatever they signed with him in their original contract probably does "authorize" it. I doubt he broke any laws for $6500.00.

I don't think they realized money was exchanging hands though. And the more I think about it the more I think the Anthony's have a deal with someone else that being paid for the photos would put them in violation of.

They aren't doing this to defend their public image. Cindy has made it clear the public can go F themselves.
 
Whatever they signed with him in their original contract probably does "authorize" it. I doubt he broke any laws for $6500.00.

I don't think they realized money was exchanging hands though. And the more I think about it the more I think the Anthony's have a deal with someone else that being paid for the photos would put them in violation of.

They aren't doing this to defend their public image. Cindy has made it clear the public can go F themselves.

If there is an 'original contract' Garrison will be able to provide a copy to the media. I don't think there is, or Nejame would not have gone public with this.
 
If there is an 'original contract' Garrison will be able to provide a copy to the media. I don't think there is, or Nejame would not have gone public with this.

Contracts are open to interpretation, many a lawsuit is filed over interpretation of the language, and both parties believe 100% they are right.
 
They most likely only paid $6,500 for the photos. The contract they signed with the spokesperson probably enabled him to strike the deal. If it didn't happen the way Cindy says and how NBC responded why isn't the spokesperson saying this was the agreement and how I was being paid? He clearly cashed the check. I find his quitting because of erratic behaviour to be thin.

Now the cynic in me also says Cindy's real beef with this is if NBC wrote a check for $6500.00 supposedly to the Anthony's, what is that conflicting with? What contract or deal that is suppose to be exclusive would that put them in conflict with.

If she would pocket $200 in the middle of that chaos, I would think she would want her $6500.00 back. But the email didn't say we haven't received our check, what do you mean LG got the check already?

The answer is right here in NBC/CA e-mail exchange:

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/orl-casey-anthony-nbc-corresondence-document-11120,0,3427699.htmlpage
 
Whatever they signed with him in their original contract probably does "authorize" it. I doubt he broke any laws for $6500.00.

I don't think they realized money was exchanging hands though. And the more I think about it the more I think the Anthony's have a deal with someone else that being paid for the photos would put them in violation of.

They aren't doing this to defend their public image. Cindy has made it clear the public can go F themselves.


Now we're talking some sense here! Larry's pittance of 6500 smackers is jeopardizing the big enchilada!!!
 
How come Cindy doesn't care about Amy's money? The money she took from KC'S wallet was whose?
What about Jessie's 250.00 that KC never paid back and Cindy didn't seem to care?
Also if the A's got 200,000 than maybe the rest is a commision for Garrison.
Everyone in this entire case is making money they never would have made if KC didn't make her daughter "Disappear".

How much did Casey steal from her grandparents?

I'd think Cindy might return that amount to them. She should.
 
I don't know where the truth lies anymore. What made me the saddest of the whole article..TM and MJ talking about people making money of this case. I could say more, but ask yourself..isn't that a bit like the pot calling the kettle black?

What money has TM made?
 
I know that Cindy has done a lot of things that have angered people, but can't anyone accept that just maybe not everything she does is evil? Maybe she and George really were conned by LG in this instance, and there is no ulterior motive other than perhaps her wanting to know why NBC said payment was made when, to her knowledge, there was no payment?
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
166
Guests online
574
Total visitors
740

Forum statistics

Threads
626,021
Messages
18,515,779
Members
240,893
Latest member
Noob
Back
Top