Anthony's Seek Full Immunity#2

Status
Not open for further replies.
The A's attorney BC was just on TruTV. When asked about the conflicting statements CA and GA gave between the LE and media interviews he said he was not going to comment because he wanted LE to have to first opportunity to hear the FULL truth from the A's.

Wow. I bet they want the immunity deal before they start spilling their guts.
 
ITA my FIL is an ex DC Homicide Detective of 30 years. I cut 12 inches of my hair off and he didn't even notice. A lot of people think b/c GA was ex-LE that he would remember something like that..which he might, but I personally doubt it. JMO.

I hope you gave him grief for that, LOL
 
if George lied about seeing Caylee and KC on the 16th, by lying it moves the actual crime scene out of the A's house and to some unknown location. It blocks alot of direct investigation in his house. Which if it is the actual scene of the scrime, shields KC from possible evidence found there.

If it is a lie, it is a HUGE lie, one that directly and deliberately interfered with a homicide investigation. And one that could lead to accesory after the fact type charges.

Hypothetically, I strongly agree that IF this were a lie, it is a significant one. A child was missing, and LE was trying to determine when she she went missing, with whom she was last seen alive, etc. It's part of the basics or essentials of the investigation. Trying to act as if nothing amiss happened on the night of the 15th, no argument over money thefts from family members or whatever, tawdry lifestyle choices, etc., IF in fact it did, would be another example. Whether such lies seem effective or smart isn't the test of illegality. What they would be more suggestive of would be some sort of concern that Casey was responsible and the resulting desire to misdirect the investigation away from her.
 
Hello Sleuths :)
I'm a lurker for afew yrs. now. Just thought I'd finally come out of lurking mode and say hello. You guys do a great job here. I get lost on here sometimes so if I am posting in the wrong thread just let me know. I think the defense team are just going to try to save casey from the death penalty. That is their only hope.


Welcome soul_tear. I lurked myself for the longest time but I "came out" finally because of this case with Caylee. I love it here There are some of the smartest and funniest group of people, I never cease to be amazed. Welcome again and I'm glad that you "came out" of the lurking closet! :blowkiss:
 
I think you might be right! We may never know of course. Was a coverup conscious and calcuted in detail, or not?

It may be that when G & C could not accept that Caylee was deceased, they created a false reality to allow them to cope and function.

They then would feel justified in altering the real reality to fit in with their false reality to which they clung.

They are really torn at this point because they are dealing with this unfathomable loss and also the impending loss of Casey from the home.

This is not to say I am overflowing with compassion for them. I was in the beginning , but they talked alot of that out of me.

jmho:)

PS Can anyone answer the question I asked that got buried???


:help:​
DId the Anthony's lie about the big fight anyway, so as to create the illusion that it did not happen??? That's how I remember it but I am not sure.:blowkiss:

I ask because if the motive for George to lie about when Casey and Caylee left the house, is to take emphasis off that fight....we would need to know about the fight. If we don't know about it, why hide it from us?

To this day the A's have never admitted to LE or in public that the fight on the 15th happened. All info on it comes from neighbors and CA's relatives.
 
PS Can anyone answer the question I asked that got buried???


:help:​
DId the Anthony's lie about the big fight anyway, so as to create the illusion that it did not happen??? That's how I remember it but I am not sure.:blowkiss:

I ask because if the motive for George to lie about when Casey and Caylee left the house, is to take emphasis off that fight....we would need to know about the fight. If we don't know about it, why hide it from us?

IIRC, and someone can correct me if I'm wrong, Cindy's brother stated the fight was over the money Casey stole from her grandparents. Yes I think the everything is hunky dory story about the 16th was to distract and keep LE from going there. If GA had not told that he saw the girls on the 16th leaving, the last known place would have been the A's. It was another case of the A's overexplaining something before they needed to. They do things in a "backwards sort of way".
 
To this day the A's have never admitted to LE or in public that the fight on the 15th happened. All info on it comes from neighbors and CA's relatives.



Thank You!!!:blowkiss:

I think if we were never told about that fight, that George's motive to lie couldn't be to take emphasis off the fight we don't know about so thank you...I'm gettin old; Can't remember every little detail, not that I ever could.
 
I am actually more interested in the fight that JG said happened in February or March, when either KC put her hands to CA's throat, or vice versa. it was around this time that all the web searches on "neck breaking" and "shovel" and "self defense" started popping up. In my opinion this is not a coincidence, and I hope that LE will get the As to discuss it. I only saw it mentioned in JG's interview, which will be attributed as heresay in court, and I would love confirmation of it by the A's of what exactly happened there.

not that I would give immunity for it. let them sweat it out. they are nervous enough as it is about being charged with anything, let's see if they start turning on eachother in desperation - they've already offered to sell Casey out to LE. it just kills me that GA KNOWS what happened and he still has to stand by CA in her denial and delusion. I would predict that, of anyone, he would cave first.
 
IIRC, and someone can correct me if I'm wrong, Cindy's brother stated the fight was over the money Casey stole from her grandparents. Yes I think the everything is hunky dory story about the 16th was to distract and keep LE from going there. If GA had not told that he saw the girls on the 16th leaving, the last known place would have been the A's. It was another case of the A's overexplaining something before they needed to. They do things in a "backwards sort of way".

THANKS!!!:blowkiss: It's been driving me crazy...
 
Hypothetically, I strongly agree that IF this were a lie, it is a significant one. A child was missing, and LE was trying to determine when she she went missing, with whom she was last seen alive, etc. It's part of the basics or essentials of the investigation. Trying to act as if nothing amiss happened on the night of the 15th, no argument over money thefts from family members or whatever, tawdry lifestyle choices, etc., IF in fact it did, would be another example. Whether such lies seem effective or smart isn't the test of illegality. What they would be more suggestive of would be some sort of concern that Casey was responsible and the resulting desire to misdirect the investigation away from her.



As it was, they (LE) were already 31 days behind the ball so and then the family has been anything but honest & forthcoming - it truly is an outright miracle that LE has gotten where they've gotten in this case and that Caylee's remains were found! Justice is a beautiful thing.

Darn it, I have to go get an oil change! (on my car, not me) :behindbar
 
I've got a question, does anybody think that KC would start talking if she knew that her mother or father or brother were arrested and sitting in a cell? Curious...


KC, who steals from her own grandparents, caring about others? HA!

thanks for the laugh. :)
 
Lies are bad enough-but remember Cindy said lying was not a crime. However, 1. Tampering with evidence 2. Obstruction of an investigation and 3. Accessory after the fact are in my opinion on a whole different level. I hope LE and FBI take their time to consider whether they deserve a pass on this. Being honest from the start couldn't have saved Caylee's life BUT, if Caylee hadn't been found-it could have gotten a murderer freed!!!:furious:
 
How sad Caylee wasn't adopted out!:mad:

I thought the same thing, essie. in this case, adoption would have been a GIFT to that little girl. there are so many good families looking to adopt out there that would have actually given this child a good life, the life she was meant to have.
 
here's a thought - instead of giving BOTH immunity, do you think they could offer immunity to them individually to implicate eachother? it's the classic prisoners dilemma. I wonder who would go down first!
 
here's a thought - instead of giving BOTH immunity, do you think they could offer immunity to them individually to implicate eachother? it's the classic prisoners dilemma. I wonder who would go down first!


If George gave up Cindy, he would not want immunity.

He would pray to be put into protective custody!
 
First and foremost, hello everyone, please forgive me for plunging in with an opinion in my very first post, but the idea of immunity finally forced me to register and comment.

In their LKL appearance the night before the remains were discovered, LK played CA's 911 call (where she describes the car's smell)for GA/CA, then a minute or two later asked CA a question regarding her remarks. CA responded "I never said that" .. I was floored. Did she not just hear herself say those words??

IMHO, To offer immunity in exchange for the truth would be absolutely foolhardy on the prosecution's part. Whatever their motives for lying in the past, their credibility is shot to hell unless they can be held accountable for their statements going forward. Better to charge them and enter into a plea agreement for lesser charges or dropped charges in exchange for fully truthful testimony. With that option, were they to lie under oath, the deal is void and perjury charges may (and should) be pursued.

BTW.. mho (my honest opinion), GA was pretty much in the dark for the longest time... CA on the other hand, may be in it up to her neck somehow, and I'm willing to bet LE can prove her involvement.
 
Personally i think they know that the crap is about to hit the fan and they want to make sure their butts are covered.
 
This has probably been asked and answered a hundred times, but why did the A's new attorney even make this public? Why not go to the authorities and ask for immunity in private? What was the advantage to do it this way? Unless he had the mistaken idea they would get loads of public sympathy in favor of an immunity deal and felt the prosecution would be pressured to go along? I'm not understanding... help!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
197
Guests online
1,037
Total visitors
1,234

Forum statistics

Threads
626,540
Messages
18,528,172
Members
241,076
Latest member
secretsluetherNC
Back
Top