Anthony's Seek Full Immunity#2

[Tsaver5683]

Does anyone else find it strange that in every interview with GA about the last time he saw KC an her daughter that "I was watching my favorite show on the Food Network" But he never specifies a show? When you usually speak about your favorite show, don't you just say the shows name vs the network or channel (I was watching my favorite show on channel 83...?) BTW I live in central Florida and probably have the same cable setup -- Paula's home cooking or Everyday Italian with Giada are on in that time frame M-F, which anyone who I have come across that love those shows call them by name. That was my first feeling of CA coaching him, she actually interrupts him as he is getting to that part in one of their interviews, IMO was to make sure it came out her way. So he wouldn't mess up the storyline.

(IMO CA wouldn't let GA watch Giada, she is very cute and may threaten CA)

 

[BeanE]

I agree, it's like a slap in the face to LE.

IMO not telling the truth of her story, what happened to her, is a slap in the face to the murder victim - Caylee.

Caylee deserves to have her true and whole story told. Anything less says that Caylee didn't matter.

 

[Blackwatch]

Hey, let 'em not co-operate. What's new? The state can very probably get KC without them. They can put them on the stand without giving them bupkiss. Let the jury see them being evasive and snippy. I think they're on tape extensively and I think the tapes can come in without them against KC if needed, probably not against them, but against KC. Let it roll without their 'co-operation.' I'm not sure anyone in this family is capable of co-operating with the police, or of putting justice for Caylee above protection of KC. The jury will almost certainly see that. The jury would be better off anyway if it didn't have to listen to Cindy drone on and probably lecture the judge and the jury in the process. They've shown the world who they are. We should believe them. I'm not sure LE wants to prosecute them, but as always, they're making it harder and harder for LE not to take that track. Besides, what the fridge do they need immunity for? Haven't they been telling the truth all along? And if not, what makes anyone think they'd tell the truth now?

Bolding mine.

You mean the "grieving grandparents", ya know, the same ones who said they loved Caylee with all their hearts and bought her stuff, may not have been telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth to LE all along?

How could such a thing be true? I mean, haven't they told us over and over and over that we need to focus on Caylee? To get off our asses and find their grandaughter? Do you mean there's the slightest possibility the A family hasn't done all it could to bring that tiny bag of bones that once was a vibrant, singing child out of a garbage dump for a Christian burial? Does that mean the same hammer and bat-weilding people who protected GRASS so bravely didn't do all they could for their own grandaughter? Do you think George was telling us something when he put that yellow crime tape around Cindy's house?

WOW, I find this whole thing mind boggling.

My opinion only.

 

[Bev]

Plato was an *ss. It could well be that the Anthonys' lawyer is doing what any good lawyer does - protect his client from any future possible prosecution. If Conway sees that they could be exposed to any kind of liability, real or perceived, it is his duty to prevent that.

Many times prosecutors will threaten witnesses with future prosecution if they fail to co-operate as the prosecutor thinks they should. Prosecutors can coerce testimony from witnesses that is wholly advantageous to the prosecution when that testimony can be ambiguous or even false. "Conflicting statements" doesn't mean that anyone deliberately lied or misled LE, but a prosecutor can certainly indict and prosecute even if the witness unknowlingly gave a conflicting statement.

This has nothing to do with the Anthonys ensuring book/movie/tv rights - giving a conflicting statement to LE does not mean that the Anthonys were directly involved or accessories after the fact, it means exactly what it says. Even if they did give conflicting or false statements, they can still write all the books they want to write.

 

[TotallyObsessed]

Bolding mine.

You mean the "grieving grandparents", ya know, the same ones who said they loved Caylee with all their hearts and bought her stuff, may not have been telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth to LE all along?

How could such a thing be true? I mean, haven't they told us over and over and over that we need to focus on Caylee? To get off our asses and find their grandaughter? Do you mean there's the slightest possibility the A family hasn't done all it could to bring that tiny bag of bones that once was a vibrant, singing child out of a garbage dump for a Christian burial? Does that mean the same hammer and bat-weilding people who protected GRASS so bravely didn't do all they could for their own grandaughter? Do you think George was telling us something when he put that yellow crime tape around Cindy's house?

WOW, I find this whole thing mind boggling.

My opinion only.

:clap::clap::clap:
The same grandparents who evidently will not take the time to schedule or plan their granddaughter's funeral, because there are rumors that LE is holding off until after the service to bring formal charges.......so hey, let's just not bury her and we'll show LE.

 

[Paintr]

Bolding mine.

You mean the "grieving grandparents", ya know, the same ones who said they loved Caylee with all their hearts and bought her stuff, may not have been telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth to LE all along?

How could such a thing be true? I mean, haven't they told us over and over and over that we need to focus on Caylee? To get off our asses and find their grandaughter? Do you mean there's the slightest possibility the A family hasn't done all it could to bring that tiny bag of bones that once was a vibrant, singing child out of a garbage dump for a Christian burial? Does that mean the same hammer and bat-weilding people who protected GRASS so bravely didn't do all they could for their own grandaughter? Do you think George was telling us something when he put that yellow crime tape around Cindy's house?

WOW, I find this whole thing mind boggling.

My opinion only.

"protected grass so bravely':clap:' LMAO! That was priceless, Blackwatch. I do like the rest of your post also. You are not the only one who is 'boggled'!

 

[gardenhart]

Does anyone else find it strange that in every interview with GA about the last time he saw KC an her daughter that "I was watching my favorite show on the Food Network" But he never specifies a show? When you usually speak about your favorite show, don't you just say the shows name vs the network or channel (I was watching my favorite show on channel 83...?) BTW I live in central Florida and probably have the same cable setup -- Paula's home cooking or Everyday Italian with Giada are on in that time frame M-F, which anyone who I have come across that love those shows call them by name. That was my first feeling of CA coaching him, she actually interrupts him as he is getting to that part in one of their interviews, IMO was to make sure it came out her way. So he wouldn't mess up the storyline.

(IMO CA wouldn't let GA watch Giada, she is very cute and may threaten CA)

I've posted about this twice before. Food Network had a different schedule then and Unwrapped, an episode about mint foods, was on that day. If you do a search, I posted the schedule for that day for several hours around that time.

 

[bessie]

Plato was an *ss. It could well be that the Anthonys' lawyer is doing what any good lawyer does - protect his client from any future possible prosecution. If Conway sees that they could be exposed to any kind of liability, real or perceived, it is his duty to prevent that.

Many times prosecutors will threaten witnesses with future prosecution if they fail to co-operate as the prosecutor thinks they should. Prosecutors can coerce testimony from witnesses that is wholly advantageous to the prosecution when that testimony can be ambiguous or even false. "Conflicting statements" doesn't mean that anyone deliberately lied or misled LE, but a prosecutor can certainly indict and prosecute even if the witness unknowlingly gave a conflicting statement.

This has nothing to do with the Anthonys ensuring book/movie/tv rights - giving a conflicting statement to LE does not mean that the Anthonys were directly involved or accessories after the fact, it means exactly what it says. Even if they did give conflicting or false statements, they can still write all the books they want to write.

Thanks, Bev. I've got a headache and fever and was struggling to write what you just did.

 

[nomoresorrow]

she also said "lying isn't a crime" (or something along that line)---I say to LE---PROVE HER WRONG--it is a CRIME especially when there is a child missing or crime committed.... I'm just tired of the laws applying to the rest of us but not the A's....makes me sick

I certainly hope that the Orange County pr. office has a consistant track record in similar cases because there will be a huge outpouring of outrage if not....


(sorry)

 

[Paintr]

I have seen very little so called normal reaction from this family. Defiance, mendacity, anger,posturing, threats, name calling, ect but I have a difficult time believing they are naive or trusting. I think they knew early on and went into frantic cover up mode. The ques is cover up what? KC's crime? family secrets? image? reputation? It's anybody's guess.

 

[zoey]

I certainly hope that the Orange County pr. office has a consistant track record in similar cases because there will be a huge outpouring of outrage if not....


(sorry)

thats what I'm thinking.....of course I think in the laws of a's....this only applies to that family only....:waitasec:

 

[reeseeva]

I certainly hope that the Orange County pr. office has a consistant track record in similar cases because there will be a huge outpouring of outrage if not....


(sorry)

Do you think, if the Anthonys help to prosecute their daughter, that she will confess, or look for a plea deal, & spare the state thousands of $$$ & put an end to this travesty?

 

[zoey]

Do you think, if the Anthonys help to prosecute their daughter, that she will confess, or look for a plea deal, & spare the state thousands of $$$ & put an end to this travesty?

no....

 

[nomoresorrow]

thats what I'm thinking.....of course I think in the laws of a's....this only applies to that family only....:waitasec:

Just a question...I've heard (No first-hand knowledge whatsoever) that when your in, or have been in law enforcement, they watch out for one another (i.e,brotherhood) regardless of what state you serve or served in. Is it possible that someone from GA's LE past could be going out on a limb for him? From everything that I've read, he seem's to have been in good standing and didn't leave LE with a tarnished record. Possible? Any police people,duputy's, detectives out there?

 

[doogiesgirl]

At first I thought LE should hear what they have to say and if it's valuable enough then go ahead and give them immunity.

Now, after thinking about it longer, plain and simple they just cannot be trusted. Sc**w Em. Who needs their conditional honesty? Their day late and dollar short pretense at wanting to do right by Caylee. Why no plans as of 12-31-08 for Caylee's funeral? Are they now holding the bones of that precious child hostage for self protectiion? Will they ever look back and see how many times they stabbed Caylee in the back? I may need to go to the rant thread. JMO

 

[Moe]

:clap::clap::clap:
The same grandparents who evidently will not take the time to schedule or plan their granddaughter's funeral, because there are rumors that LE is holding off until after the service to bring formal charges.......so hey, let's just not bury her and we'll show LE.

I wrote this on another thread a few days ago, this is so outrageous! The A's should be planning poor little Caylee's funeral, not demanding immunity from LE before they will cooperate. Slap the cuffs on already, this has gone on long enough. Caylee deserves so much better than this.

 

[nomoresorrow]

Do you think, if the Anthonys help to prosecute their daughter, that she will confess, or look for a plea deal, & spare the state thousands of $$$ & put an end to this travesty?

Today, well at least for the moment, I think...

KC will never confess, I don't think God himself threatening to testify against her would make her confess....

No confession, no plea deal, nope, that's not going to work.

I don't think KC gives a flying chit how much $$ this costs the state, matter of fact I've got a hunch, if you asked her, she probably thinks the state of Florida owes her money!

Just my opinion at the moment....subject to change without notice.

 

[McSev]

Plato was an *ss. It could well be that the Anthonys' lawyer is doing what any good lawyer does - protect his client from any future possible prosecution. If Conway sees that they could be exposed to any kind of liability, real or perceived, it is his duty to prevent that.

Many times prosecutors will threaten witnesses with future prosecution if they fail to co-operate as the prosecutor thinks they should. Prosecutors can coerce testimony from witnesses that is wholly advantageous to the prosecution when that testimony can be ambiguous or even false. "Conflicting statements" doesn't mean that anyone deliberately lied or misled LE, but a prosecutor can certainly indict and prosecute even if the witness unknowlingly gave a conflicting statement.

This has nothing to do with the Anthonys ensuring book/movie/tv rights - giving a conflicting statement to LE does not mean that the Anthonys were directly involved or accessories after the fact, it means exactly what it says. Even if they did give conflicting or false statements, they can still write all the books they want to write.

Your first sentence was priceless Thanks for the chuckle!

I agree completely with what you're saying about the book, movie and tv rights. Someone would have to "ghost write" a book for them or ask for their participation - and obstruction charges or a conviction of such wouldn't impact that whatsoever. Reason? Easy: they didn't kill their granddaughter. The only person who couldn't make any $$$ would be Casey, if/when she is convicted of her daughter's murder.

 

[marla]

she also said "lying isn't a crime" (or something along that line)---I say to LE---PROVE HER WRONG--it is a CRIME especially when there is a child missing or crime committed.... I'm just tired of the laws applying to the rest of us but not the A's....makes me sick

:clap: BRAVO!! :clap:

 

[doogiesgirl]

I just checked out several news outlets, and on the Sentinel Blog, people are up in arms about the A's getting immunity. If LE/SA listens to the people, the A's won't be getting it.