April 29 weekend of Sleuthiness

[unc70]

I may know how to create the event log error and no other network traffic for it on the home network.

BC closes the lid or otherwise causes the laptop to hibernate while still on the Cisco lan. The 3825 is also on that lan at that time and its IP is known. BC unplugs the laptop from the Cisco lan and goes home.

After the party, BC connects the laptop to his home lan and resumes the laptop. The IP used by 3825 on the Cisco network is used by some device already on the home lan. Duplicate IP address.

I may have missed something, but I have this happen sometimes with my iPhone. I lock it, eventually its powersave disables the wifi. When the iPhone fails to renew is lease on the IP, the IP becomes available, and when I turn on the laptop it is assigned the same IP. When I resume the iPhone, it tries to use that same IP and gets the conflict error.

I will check back when I return.

 

[Cheyenne130]

Well, I still can't imagine any way that some device caching or retaining an address caused a duplicate address error to be reported by the laptop (assuming that's really what has been found). Even if some device mysteriously still had that IP/MAC combination, there is really no reason for it to somehow report it to the laptop thus causing the laptop to report the error. But, that's just me.

Here's my opinion, which will be applauded or blasted depending on whose side you are on here. The opinion is based on 2 things: 1) I've been working on data networking my entire career, 2) I'm not a conspiracy theorist. It is: if the 3825's MAC address was detected on the network by the laptop on 8/11, the 3825 was on the same LAN as the laptop (meaning in the house) on 8/11.

I agree with everything except the 8/11. I would characterize it as 7/11. :wink:

 

[CrimeAddict]

Thats the thing, for me, I can not say I don't think he should be found not guilty of first degree murder. I don't think, IMHO, he should be at all. But, rage, I almost think I could. In that type of trail I think, I if I were a juror, would be more inclined to give more weight to the gossip, he said she said, the divorce, the financials. I would most like without a doubt be more inclined to think 'emotions' play such a part in what I perceive a rage killing to be.

Just my :twocents:

Funny you say that because some times when the jury convicts they give interviews and have their own theory about what happened and come to their own conclusions after hearing the testimony. They don't necessarily believe the prosecutions theory. I have watched many real life trials and specials when this happens.. should be an interesting week you guys!

 

[momof7]

If the statistics were more in depth, they would probably show that a huge number of spousal homicides were either premeditated or a rage of passion. These types of murders don't usually 'just' happen. The DA may have wonked up on the actual charge because I think Brad killed Nancy in a passionate rage just after she returned from the party. If there was any premeditation via the Google maps, I think it came about because she had been away with the girls the week prior and he got a taste of freedom and that's when his plan really began to take shape. I don't think he knew exactly when he would do it, but I feel the night of the 11th/12th he had simply had enough and it just happened. Of course, this is my most humble opinion.

My only disagreement in the theory is freedom. Freedom that week meant 'alone' not just without NC. He had to have realized in his planning he would not be free, there were 2 little girls to take care of. He wouldn't be free of anything really, he would be more tied down. Like the other case currently being shown about I believe is a woman and her two sons violently killed, I can easily assume premeditation, he thought about freedom and what he needed to do to be truly free. Again, IMHO and nothing more. And expounding further, if I am to believe thru NC friends testimony about BC's parenting ability, there is not a moment I would believe he wanted to be a single parent. But, I have been wrong before.

 

[NCEast]

I've never been to their site. What I find interesting is that people on here rip Kurtz because his specialty is drug cases. Yet both AF and BZ are listed on that site as their primary role is the "Drug Unit".

And the female ADA is in the drug unit too. I noticed both names and it somewhat surprised me. Do you think it could be because they have had trial experience with Kurtz in the past and that's why they were plucked out of the drug unit to participate in this trial?
You know, I really like Kurtz. I have grown accustomed to his whine--it doesn't even bother me any more. I am beginning to think he's cute too. Hope I never need him but I have to say he's given 110 percent in this case. I'm going to come away from this trial recommending him to my friends in the Raleigh area if they ever need a specific type of service he is well versed in. I 'liked' his law firm on FB the other day.

 

[sunshine05]

I've never been to their site. What I find interesting is that people on here rip Kurtz because his specialty is drug cases. Yet both AF and BZ are listed on that site as their primary role is the "Drug Unit".

I have a feeling after this trial, he will be in very high demand. I wouldn't be surprised if he chooses to stick to drug charges though. He has really impressed me throughout this trial. He's very intelligent and so respectful to every single witness. He even manages to keep himself calm when JG loses his patience.

 

[SleuthSayer]

I may know how to create the event log error and no other network traffic for it on the home network.

BC closes the lid or otherwise causes the laptop to hibernate while still on the Cisco lan. The 3825 is also on that lan at that time and its IP is known. BC unplugs the laptop from the Cisco lan and goes home.

After the party, BC connects the laptop to his home lan and resumes the laptop. The IP used by 3825 on the Cisco network is used by some device already on the home lan. Duplicate IP address.

I may have missed something, but I have this happen sometimes with my iPhone. I lock it, eventually its powersave disables the wifi. When the iPhone fails to renew is lease on the IP, the IP becomes available, and when I turn on the laptop it is assigned the same IP. When I resume the iPhone, it tries to use that same IP and gets the conflict error.

I will check back when I return.

[Again, assuming that a Dup Address error is really what's in the log.] The laptop is reporting that some device that has the MAC address of the 3825 has the same IP address as that of the laptop. I don't follow how your scenario accounts for that.

 

[Cheyenne130]

I may know how to create the event log error and no other network traffic for it on the home network.

BC closes the lid or otherwise causes the laptop to hibernate while still on the Cisco lan. The 3825 is also on that lan at that time and its IP is known. BC unplugs the laptop from the Cisco lan and goes home.

After the party, BC connects the laptop to his home lan and resumes the laptop. The IP used by 3825 on the Cisco network is used by some device already on the home lan. Duplicate IP address.

I may have missed something, but I have this happen sometimes with my iPhone. I lock it, eventually its powersave disables the wifi. When the iPhone fails to renew is lease on the IP, the IP becomes available, and when I turn on the laptop it is assigned the same IP. When I resume the iPhone, it tries to use that same IP and gets the conflict error.

I will check back when I return.

The problem with that scenario is that the address assigned on the Cisco network would be a 10. address. (IMO) The home TWC would be something like 192. address. The laptop would have to first connect to the TWC network before connecting to the VPN. (AIMO)

 

[ncsu95]

I took the juror's note differently. I figured it meant (like I speculated here earlier) that they decided he was guilty weeks ago and we are just going through the motions at this point.

Based on what FullDisclosure and JohnFear have indicated about the jury reaction to the antics and cross examination tactics by the ADAs, I would disagree.

 

[Palomine]

I am pretty sure Mrs. C said it was in a box on the foyer table.

don't think I would leave a special necklace in a box in the foyer

 

[Cheyenne130]

Based on what FullDisclosure and JohnFear have indicated about the jury reaction to the antics and cross examination tactics by the ADAs, I would disagree.

I am more inclined to agree with gritguy who has seen more than one jury and believes that just as soon as you think you have the jury figured out, you haven't. (Those are my words, not his. I'm paraphrasing.) Remember that they have not had a chance to discuss any of this. None know what the others are thinking.

 

[WolfpackWoman]

don't think I would leave a special necklace in a box in the foyer

I took it to mean a jewelry box.

 

[SleuthinNC]

The problem with that scenario is that the address assigned on the Cisco network would be a 10. address. (IMO) The home TWC would be something like 192. address. The laptop would have to first connect to the TWC network before connecting to the VPN. (AIMO)

But didn't we see on the CSA logs the addresses were 10.x.x.x?

 

[macd]

How familiar are you with event logs? What are they typically used to determine? I have NO idea what typically shows up on them.

Click on Control Panel, System and Maintenance, Administrative Tools, Event Viewer. This is the Windows Event Viewer. To see the System Events, click on System in left column.

Does anyone have any Duplicate IP Address Events in their log?

 

[Cheyenne130]

But didn't we see on the CSA logs the addresses were 10.x.x.x?

Yes. That was in the logs during the time when he was at work. That was an "intrusion" and Kurtz specifically made a comment (sort of a question) about not all of these things being something being done wrong. But it was at a time on 7/11 when he would have been at work.

 

[SleuthinNC]

Based on what FullDisclosure and JohnFear have indicated about the jury reaction to the antics and cross examination tactics by the ADAs, I would disagree.

I would also say the day I was there the jury was definitely not checked out on the defense. When JP was on the stand they were listening and when he started reading off the call logs nearly every head was down taking notes.

 

[SleuthSayer]

Based on what FullDisclosure and JohnFear have indicated about the jury reaction to the antics and cross examination tactics by the ADAs, I would disagree.

FD may be a different story, but as far as johnfear, I'd be skeptical of a man's claim of an ability to read what 1 woman is thinking, much less 10 women.

 

[WolfpackWoman]

Yes. That was in the logs during the time when he was at work. That was an "intrusion" and Kurtz specifically made a comment (sort of a question) about not all of these things being something being done wrong. But it was at a time on 7/11 when he would have been at work.

I may understand the computer stuff somewhat, but this router stuff is over my head. Would you have a different opinion of the IP conflict comes over a router with a 10.x.x.x IP address, even though he's at home?

 

[Palomine]

anybody buying the duck testimony??

 

[Cheyenne130]

I may understand the computer stuff somewhat, but this router stuff is over my head. Would you have a different opinion of the IP conflict comes over a router with a 10.x.x.x IP address, even though he's at home?

If it has a 10.x.x.x address, it's not on a home network as far as I know.