I am SO confused. Can someone help me out here?
Ms Stubbs said she only sent Seperation papers to NC, and NOT to BC. We know this because she testified to it.
But then why in April did BC and her fight over it if he shouldn't have seen it? That means she told him about the 2100 child support per month and he said forget it you are staying here? He must have seen those papers then, it sounds like she showed him?
I am so confused.
I have been confused about that part as well. I think Nancy must have told him about certain aspects of it and/or he confiscated the info off her computer. I can't remember if there has been actual testimony about his tampering with her computer and just when she found out or suspected he was doing so.
There has been so very much tiny detail in this case that I'm beginning to lose my footing with respect to actual testimony, by whom, when, how, etc.