"That morning, Monday morning when I got to work, I called and spoke with a detective. And he said there was actually no report filed. And he come and spoke to me, and we filed the missing report on Monday."
snipped-http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1410/13/ijvm.01.html
I STILL want to know who is 'we'
what time 'he' went to speak to her (before or after however the report with JC was made?)
If he said 'no report' was actually filed, was he implying that BR DID go to police dept, but no report filed Sat nite??
I do get it .SPD filed that report, and JC's name is on it.
TS or anyone else? Not seeing their name as reporting. Not seeing a "Oh this is a follow up report made last night by BR, TS, JC," or anyone else. Where is that?
That's just standard practice- if you have a call out (and that means a show up report too), report at your particular PD or SO or whatever LEA reporting- it goes into an incident report. If you have to follow up on an incident report- you follow up and denote previous reports. If your shift changes and a report came in on previous shift but then you need to file a follow up- I mean, do ya'll get my drift??
Where are those reports??
I do get it .
I also know it doesn't always work that way. Sorry I would love to support your statement fully. It just always doesn't work that way.
http://law.justia.com/codes/arkansas/2010/title-12/subtitle-2/chapter-12/subchapter-8/12-12-801/SPD filed that report, and JC's name is on it.
TS or anyone else? Not seeing their name as reporting. Not seeing a "Oh this is a follow up report made last night by BR, TS, JC," or anyone else. Where is that?
That's just standard practice- if you have a call out (and that means a show up report too), report at your particular PD or SO or whatever LEA reporting- it goes into an incident report. If you have to follow up on an incident report- you follow up and denote previous reports. If your shift changes and a report came in on previous shift but then you need to file a follow up- I mean, do ya'll get my drift??
Where are those reports??
[/QUOTE]Trying to remain impartial here, because depts. differ so much.
Re: incident reports-
What I know is that if you make a report, you can request it in writing after the fact (if it wasn't handed to you at the time, you didn't ask for it at the time, and you want/need it now). If the dept or agency responsible for taking that report cannot produce it, then they need a very good reason. Jmvho.
I am unsure as to who has copies of their own reports.
Does anyone else know?
and yes Twimmom is a verified local
and imho, if it could be verified by LE that BR DID go to dept and was pretty much brushed off, that could be crucial
No. Not at all. But all possibilities should be vetted. If someone is reading this (other than us), a memory could be triggered. Please continue with considering all avenues.yep in the grand scheme, we certainly can not completely dismiss him
This is an astute observation. HmmmmYou know what I've been wondering about that whole clip? The change in language from 'truck' to 'vehicle.'
I know I've had to catch myself a few times, when making a statement about an event that I know occurred, but perhaps I'm not supposed to say anything about just yet. I've also known people to correct their statements to something that LE is advising them on correcting. And I've known people to correct themselves on wording when they are unsure of what the event actually was. AND I've known some people to correct wording when they are trying to distance from an event, or want to make sure they are distanced from an event.
I can understand TS adjusting that wording. But I do wonder, in the moment- why go from truck to vehicle specifically? Was that prompted? And if so...by who?
I'm no profiler, but I am a curious person by nature; and as a result curious about why that specific clarification was made during that interview.
Did anyone anywhere at anytime say they saw the "vehicle" at Cassie's that night? It would be a good way to verify two questions by simply asking BR what they were driving in. What was she picked up in?To me and my acquaintances, a "truck" is a pickup and a SUV is a "vehicle." I don't say, "I left my keys in my SUV." In my mind, I was thinking the TS/HS family had been to DeWitt (35 miles one-way) in a SUV vehicle which seats more people comfortably. But that HS returned Cassie to Stuttgart alone in his pickup (which only seats three legally) across the bench seat. His truck doesn't have an extended or crew cab (second row). I think TS drives something like a Chevy Trailblazer or Ford Explorer considered a SUV. I can check in town later today.
The police went to her and they filed a report?"That morning, Monday morning when I got to work, I called and spoke with a detective. And he said there was actually no report filed. And he come and spoke to me, and we filed the missing report on Monday."
snipped-http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1410/13/ijvm.01.html
I STILL want to know who is 'we'
what time 'he' went to speak to her (before or after however the report with JC was made?)
If he said 'no report' was actually filed, was he implying that BR DID go to police dept, but no report filed Sat nite??