calus_3 said:The Dems are correctly beginning steps to draft legislation to prevent this...and rightfully so.
Cal
Gotta love em :dance:
calus_3 said:The Dems are correctly beginning steps to draft legislation to prevent this...and rightfully so.
Cal
This has to make supporters of the Bush adminsitration pause, and wonder what is going on. The Bush adminisitration sees nothing wrong with these ports being run by a company from the United Arab Emirates, despite the fact that it was terrorists from the United Arab Emirates who were involved in planning and executing 9/11.PrayersForMaura said:Lawmakers Urge Greater Review of UAE Firm's Deal to Run Six U.S. Ports
WASHINGTON Questioning the United Arab Emirates' track record in the War on Terror, seven U.S. lawmakers said Thursday they want a committee led by Treasury Secretary John Snow to thoroughly review a deal that would let a UAE-based firm run six major U.S. ports.
"We're calling for the full six-week investigation. It's a serious investigation and the reason why this is critical is while maybe there's nothing wrong with this company, how do we know they're not infiltrated?" asked Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. "The United Arab Emirates has had people involved in terrorism. In fact, some of its financial institutions laundered the money for the (Sept, 11) terrorists. And to just blithely go ahead and treat this as another economic transaction is all wrong."
Currently, London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co., the fourth largest port operator in the world, runs the six ports. But the $6.8 million sale of P&O to UAE-owned Dubai Ports World (DPW) would effectively turn over North American operations to the government-owned company in Dubai.
If the approval is unchallenged, Dubai Ports World would run the ports of New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.
More: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185107,00.html
PrayersForMaura said:Lawmakers Urge Greater Review of UAE Firm's Deal to Run Six U.S. Ports
WASHINGTON Questioning the United Arab Emirates' track record in the War on Terror, seven U.S. lawmakers said Thursday they want a committee led by Treasury Secretary John Snow to thoroughly review a deal that would let a UAE-based firm run six major U.S. ports.
"We're calling for the full six-week investigation. It's a serious investigation and the reason why this is critical is while maybe there's nothing wrong with this company, how do we know they're not infiltrated?" asked Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. "The United Arab Emirates has had people involved in terrorism. In fact, some of its financial institutions laundered the money for the (Sept, 11) terrorists. And to just blithely go ahead and treat this as another economic transaction is all wrong."
Currently, London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co., the fourth largest port operator in the world, runs the six ports. But the $6.8 million sale of P&O to UAE-owned Dubai Ports World (DPW) would effectively turn over North American operations to the government-owned company in Dubai.
If the approval is unchallenged, Dubai Ports World would run the ports of New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.
More: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185107,00.html
GREAT POST!bbmcrae said:Well, that's reassuring. The president is unaware that control of our ports was being sold to the UAE. Isn't an awareness of these things-you know, core national security issues- kinda important to being the leader of our nation?
Unless he was aware and had no problem with it until it hit the news. But that would suggest that this administration gives certain oil-producing countries a wider berth. Or that they are incompetent when it comes to little bitty things like protecting our vulenerable ports.
Of course, I don't want to contradict our commander-in-chief's tactical decision making and be construed as being against the war on terror and therefore a terrorist sympathizer. And Hillary-lover, because, um, you know, she's the big problem here! Man, is she ugly! Why can't all our female politicians be pretty?! (Sarcasm mode off)So, um, hooray for Bush! He'll save us! With Quick Draw Cheney by his side! Yay?
ANOTHER QUOTE.......j2mirish said:this is a quote taken from a cnn article this morning: if I didnt do this correctly, delete...
Bush was unaware of the deal until he heard reports of the congressional uproar, presidential adviser Dan Bartlett told CNN.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Buzzm1 said:Bush: Arab Co. Port Deal Should Proceed
WASHINGTON - President Bush said Tuesday that the deal allowing an Arab company to take over six major U.S. seaports should go forward and that he would veto any congressional effort to stop it. "After careful review by our government, I believe the transaction ought to go forward," Bush told reporters who had traveled with him on Air Force One to Washington. "I want those who are questioning it to step up and explain why all of a sudden a Middle Eastern company is held to a different standard than a Great British company. I am trying to conduct foreign policy now by saying to the people of the world, `We'll treat you fairly.'"
Bush called reporters to his conference room on the plane after returning from a speech in Colorado, addressing a controversy that is becoming a major headache for the White House. He said the seaports arrangement was "a legitimate deal that will not jeopardize the security of the country."
http://tinyurl.com/fhgqm
And I also don't trust the Defense Dept, in the person of Donald Rumsfield, to make honest decisions for the American people.j2mirish said:ANOTHER QUOTE.......
"My presumption is, and my belief is, that the president and his secretary of state and the Defense Department and others have adequately cleared the Dubai government organization to manage these ports," Carter told CNN. "I don't think there's any particular threat to our security."
![]()
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.