Arizona girl, 2, left in car by father on 109-degree day and is found dead #2

  • #821
Have there been very many hot car death cases that sent a bio parent to prison for life?
Here's one in GA, 20 years in prison, 13 month old baby, body temp 107, left 5 hours
 
  • #822
So I guess the big question is:

Does the defendant have to be charged with 2nd or manslaughter, to get something less than the charged 1st degree murder?
 
  • #823
I've missed a lot here, but murder 1 must have some mandatory range of sentencing? Or is it simply lwop. Would differ from state to state. I think.
The 1st degree was Life, the Child Abuse was 10 to 24 (17yrs) - these were flat time. No early parole, no time off for good behavior. He was going to die in prison if convicted.

The notice tonight said nothing about the Child Abuse charge. I hope that charge isn’t being dropped. The 20 to 30 yrs is hard enough to swallow. At least with the CA charge together we know he will spend at least 37 years in prison. Not what seems appropriate in this case but better than 20 years.
 
  • #824
Ok, I'm happier now. Yes in Arizona judge can instruct jury that they can find 2nd or manslaughter even if charged only with 1st degree. Per AI. But is it the same judge who let him ofg without bond??
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20251022_004842_Google.webp
    Screenshot_20251022_004842_Google.webp
    97.3 KB · Views: 3
  • #825
So I guess the big question is:

Does the defendant have to be charged with 2nd or manslaughter, to get something less than the charged 1st degree murder?
They go with the steepest charge in this case Murder1, if the jury doesn’t think the state proved 1st degree they have the choice of Murder 2, then manslaughter 1, manslaughter 2 etc, etc Otherwise the choice would be Murder 1 or acquittal. That would be awful!
 
  • #826
They go with the steepest charge in this case Murder1, if the jury doesn’t think the state proved 1st degree they have the choice of Murder 2, then manslaughter 1, manslaughter 2 etc, etc Otherwise the choice would be Murder 1 or acquittal. That would be awful!
Yeah that would be awful! But I don't think I've seen anything that proves premeditation in killing the baby. So without premeditation it has to slide down to at most 2nd degree (plus child abuse which seems inevitable to me, given that hot car baby death is one of the specific examples).
 
  • #827
With their plea offer being 20-30 years, doesn't that mean that if he is found guilty by a jury trial, that his sentence will be longer than that?
Judge Ortiz told him if he goes to trial and found guilty of Murder 1 it is a mandatory Life w/o parole, plus 10 to 24 (17 yrs) for Child Abuse.

The jury could decide that Murder1 isn’t appropriate then Murder2, Manslaughter 1 or 2 etc.
 
  • #828
Yeah that would be awful! But I don't think I've seen anything that proves premeditation in killing the baby. So without premeditation it has to slide down to at most 2nd degree (plus child abuse which seems inevitable to me, given that hot car baby death is one of the specific examples).
The Murder 1 charge was set by the Grand Jury because her death was caused by Child Abuse. Not due to premeditation. The original charge was Murder2.
 
  • #829
2nd degree, child under 15 yrs
Screenshot_20251022_010838_Google.webp
 
  • #830
Have there been very many hot car death cases that sent a bio parent to prison for life?
Not a lot. Usually hot car deaths are caused by an accident the fact that Christopher intentionally left Parker in the car, an act of Child Abuse causing death is what upped his charge to Murder1 which the judge said was a mandatory Life w/o parole.

I’m usually not in favor of charging a parent who loses a child in a hot car. Usually there is nothing the state can do to punish those parents any more than they are doing to themselves. Usually. I swear if Christopher wasn’t charged with causing Parker’s death I could 100% see him suing the car manufacturer for the car not alerting him when it shut off the AC. His being charged with her death kind of closed the door on that opportunity.
 
  • #831
Last edited:
  • #832
Yeah that would be awful! But I don't think I've seen anything that proves premeditation in killing the baby. So without premeditation it has to slide down to at most 2nd degree (plus child abuse which seems inevitable to me, given that hot car baby death is one of the specific examples).
I don't think Chris intended to kill or seriously harm Parker. He simply had a reckless disregard for her safety (and that of her siblings) which had been demonstrated on multiple prior occasions which I hope will be admissible eveidence.
 
  • #833
These "Hot Car" deaths are all over the map. There is a conspicuous lack of consistency in these cases.
Look at every single one of these cases.

 
  • #834
Ok, I'm happier now. Yes in Arizona judge can instruct jury that they can find 2nd or manslaughter even if charged only with 1st degree. Per AI. But is it the same judge who let him ofg without bond??
Different judge. Presiding trial judge is the Hon. Kimberly Ortiz.

Release without bond was the Hon. Lisa Surhio.


"The prosecutor, Brad Terrace, asked that he be held on a $1 million bond, noting that Scholtes mislead investigators about details that resulted in his daughter’s death.
Judge Lisa Surhio instead released Scholtes without bond. Scholtes was released to pre-trial services supervision and is prohibited from having any unsupervised contact with minors while the case is pending. He also is prohibited from using alcohol, drugs and having firearms."

 
  • #835
I don't think Chris intended to kill or seriously harm Parker. He simply had a reckless disregard for her safety (and that of her siblings) which had been demonstrated on multiple prior occasions which I hope will be admissible eveidence.
Definitely did it before and it certainly should be admissible. The texts will also be allowed. He said it himself.

It was about 109 degrees that day.
He later told police his daughter fell asleep in her car seat while they were returning from running errands and that he left her in the running car with the AC turned on while he went into the house, something he said he’d done before, the court document says.

The father also told police that if the car heats up too much or shuts off, he usually receives alerts on his cell phone. But that didn’t happen this time, the document says.

[...]
On July 9 in texts to his wife as she rode in an ambulance with Parker, Scholtes wrote: “Detectives are coming for me. I’m going to prison. How could I do this?"

 
  • #836
Definitely did it before and it certainly should be admissible. The texts will also be allowed. He said it himself.

It was about 109 degrees that day.
He later told police his daughter fell asleep in her car seat while they were returning from running errands and that he left her in the running car with the AC turned on while he went into the house, something he said he’d done before, the court document says.

The father also told police that if the car heats up too much or shuts off, he usually receives alerts on his cell phone. But that didn’t happen this time, the document says.

[...]
On July 9 in texts to his wife as she rode in an ambulance with Parker, Scholtes wrote: “Detectives are coming for me. I’m going to prison. How could I do this?"

LE could have, should have verified that app being on his phone. Maybe they did, it's essential imo.
 
  • #837

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
123
Guests online
6,396
Total visitors
6,519

Forum statistics

Threads
633,630
Messages
18,645,331
Members
243,623
Latest member
hannahm324
Back
Top