Here is a thought I want to test. We all talk about “grievance collectors” and “narcissistic rage” but we don’t have a good idea why. Claudio Valente’s video didn’t make it clear.
What if all such mass shooters have the urge to kill but choose "less people" and more “themed targets”?
Look at 3D theme targets. They come in different forms, “a deer”, “coastal”, but I also saw Karl Marx. Whoever you want to aim at.
So imagine that Valente chose “US academia” thematic target. (Probably because he blamed “academia” for the perceived “loss of face”.) Brown, of course, was known. We assumed that Nuno Loureiro was shot out of personal envy. But Nuno also represented MIT. MIT Valente knew poorly and would have had more problems navigating (as opposed to Brown.) A former schoolmate who was accessible but also, the head of a MIT lab was the face of MIT.
If MDM is “the alley walker” then the man seems to be aware of the objects around him. He is sure-footed and appears goal-driven. What was his theme target? Relationship? Or was it still more, “medical world”, "the dentist" (whoever he blamed for the loss of face. Could be personal or professional). This we can find out. Hopefully during the trial.
Take Kohberger who has been mentioned today. Some LE initially said that “the house could be a target”. I thought they meant "it was a party house", but maybe not?
Kohberger scared off women. But he spent his formative years in a house with a mom and two sisters. Did he internally blame growing up with women for “the loss of face”? He was extremely misogynistic in WSU and treated women badly. On video with his dad, he looks happy. So whether he targeted a certain woman (no connection has been shown to the Idaho four, has it?) or a “house with women” per se is unclear. If you remember, that autumn someone attacked a female car parked at a nearby house, and in an odd way. That house got better security.