and why would they give it to the advertiser instead of LE?!
It was a camera on The Advertiser building.
and why would they give it to the advertiser instead of LE?!
Nope, I think you are on the wrong track. That is not how it went down and I think we should be complimenting them right now, not being so critical.
First of all, they have been on to this guy, the perp, for weeks already. They had it under control, with the info they already had. But they did not want to bring him in for interrogation until they had their ducks in a row. But they had lots of important info already, but after their recent interview, they narrowed down his route out of town, so they went and looked for the video evidence to see if it matched what he told them, imo. JMO
In my earlier post I surmised that they have been on to him for quite some time. But I just do not understand why every available byte of video footage was not looked at earlier. Not to be critical but something does not add up. The press conference today should clear things up.
and why would they give it to the advertiser instead of LE?!
and why would they give it to the advertiser instead of LE?!
Crazy how close his work location at Wood Group is to the area Mickey was last seen. Wonder if he was coming from there when he spotted her...
it's a global deal, but the locations in LA are New Iberia, Thibodaux, Houma, New Orleans, Belle Chasse (Gretna) which is the one I think he was employed with
He had been either employed at the Gretna location or had just worked on a project there but now is at the Ambassador Caffrey location per friend on LinkedIn.
i know they aren't going to give us all of the details tomorrow, but what i most want to know besides where she is, is how did he get her in his car?
I would like to know if he was alone and if he acted alone throughout this whole thing? :waitasec:
I would like to know if he was alone and if he acted alone throughout this whole thing? :waitasec: