Ask Super Part 3

  • #261
I don't believe for one second that John checked the train room and the window...and NOT CHECKED the rest of the basement. You had the laundry room, the storage area next to the laundry room, the bathroom, the boiler room and the wine cellar.

When LE took photos of the basement before JonBenet's body was found, Johns two bags of golf clubs were leaning against the wall. After the body was found, one of the bags of golf clubs was found atop a box opposite the wall they were leaning on.

WHO MOVED THE GOLF BAG?
 
  • #262
Interesting Toltec, as FW stated everything he did, touched, moved or picked up. So, what else besides clubs and balls could have been in that golf bag?
 
  • #263
JR is guilty?? FW is not?? JR knew where her body was??

Doesn't sound like an "I think" or "I believe" or even "perhaps", you stated you ACTUALLY KNOW THIS TO BE CORRECT??

Proof, of the above if you have any, thanks very much.

Please read once AGAIN the signature line that appears at the bottom of every one of my posts. I don't have to state "I believe" or words to that effect every time I write something.

Do I KNOW he's guilty (of something)? Sure. Most of us do. And I doubt you have PROOF of the contrary.
 
  • #264
Please read once AGAIN the signature line that appears at the bottom of every one of my posts. I don't have to state "I believe" or words to that effect every time I write something.

Do I KNOW he's guilty (of something)? Sure. Most of us do. And I doubt you have PROOF of the contrary.

When you state your bias as a fact, I get confused.
 
  • #265
When you state your bias as a fact, I get confused.

No problem. My bias is usually correct, so I can see how that might happen. :innocent:
 
  • #266
No problem. My bias is usually correct, so I can see how that might happen. :innocent:

What was JR actually guilty of in your usually correct, biased opinion??
 
  • #267
What was JR actually guilty of in your usually correct, biased opinion??

At the very least, covering up the death of his daughter, and trying to pin it on people he knew were innocent.
 
  • #268
At the very least, covering up the death of his daughter, and trying to pin it on people he knew were innocent.

How did he cover up her death?
 
  • #269
  • #270
  • #271
[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JonBen%C3%A9t_Ramsey"]JonBenét Ramsey - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Flag_of_Colorado.svg" class="image"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/46/Flag_of_Colorado.svg/32px-Flag_of_Colorado.svg.png"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/4/46/Flag_of_Colorado.svg/32px-Flag_of_Colorado.svg.png[/ame]

"John Ramsey made arrangements for the availability of the ransom, which a friend, John Fernie, picked up that morning from a local bank."

Had JR followed the rn instructions, and proceeded to the bank with an adequate size attache, what route would he have taken?
Which bank did JF go to?
Would the IDI have known from which branch JR would pick up the money.
 
  • #272
  • #273
  • #274
Which was achieved by....?

For the purpose of ......?

Achieved by all those involved to make an accidental death look staged. (Remember, the only people, in addition to JonBenet, in the house that night PROVEN to be present, by their own testimony, were Patsy, John and Burke.)

For the purpose of staying out of prison and paying for the crimes that had been perpetrated against JonBenet. And yes, I did say crimes, as in plural.
 
  • #275
Achieved by all those involved to make an accidental death look staged. (Remember, the only people, in addition to JonBenet, in the house that night PROVEN to be present, by their own testimony, were Patsy, John and Burke.)

For the purpose of staying out of prison and paying for the crimes that had been perpetrated against JonBenet. And yes, I did say crimes, as in plural.

I'll rephrase:

Was achieved how??

For the purpose of??
 
  • #276
I'll rephrase:

Was achieved how??

For the purpose of??

Seriously?

Didn't like my previous answer? Or just asking more questions to fish for an answer different than those I provided, one that may include an intruder?

Either way you slice it MF, you have to give us a suspect before you can give a reason for the crime or covering it up. Without a suspect, there are NO right answers. Again, we KNOW WHO was there for certain that night.
 
  • #277
Someone in that house killed JB..and someone (or more) covered it up. I dont think there's any denying it was covered or staged when you put it all together in a logical sense with the emotion out of it I dont believe there is another person the R's would have covered for but someone in that house. They wouldnt have covered for a stranger, or a friend or a work associate. If IDI did it, then they were victims with no need to cover up anything. 1+1 will always equal 2.
 
  • #278
Someone in that house killed JB..and someone (or more) covered it up. I dont think there's any denying it was covered or staged when you put it all together in a logical sense with the emotion out of it I dont believe there is another person the R's would have covered for but someone in that house. They wouldnt have covered for a stranger, or a friend or a work associate. If IDI did it, then they were victims with no need to cover up anything. 1+1 will always equal 2.

Peepers, there is no doubt that someone in the house killed JBR and that they covered her with a blanket. But you have absolutely no evidence the Rs were involved. If it was simple maths it would have been solved very quickly. This is more complex than 1+1.
 
  • #279
Yes Murri...and that more complex mathematics is called Probability Theory....and it points to the Ramsey Family.
 
  • #280
Yes Murri...and that more complex mathematics is called Probability Theory....and it points to the Ramsey Family.

Were you ever employed by the Boulder Police Department LOL?
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
170
Guests online
1,130
Total visitors
1,300

Forum statistics

Threads
632,447
Messages
18,626,728
Members
243,154
Latest member
findkillers
Back
Top