- Joined
- Nov 21, 2015
- Messages
- 3,436
- Reaction score
- 13,493
So they plan on dating the blood and DNA to see if was planted. How does that work?
You have to read the Motion for Post Conviction, it is explained in there.
So they plan on dating the blood and DNA to see if was planted. How does that work?
Just went back to edit my post...LOL I know nothing about guns...LOL
Hubby found this website to answer my question to him...he says I need a new hobby...LOL
http://www.thehighroad.org/archive/index.php/t-291094.html
I did some googling while I was typing up my last post. I found some interesting studies on the "Deep Blue at the University of Michigan" site.
The study was done on femur bones (the strongest bones in the human body) with steel balls of .25 an inch diameter.
I was amazed. The bone was shattered and "completely separated the distal end from the shaft" at only 51.1 ft-lbs! The photograph makes me queezy just looking at it.
It also took less then 10 ft-lbs to put neat little round holes all the way through the bone. Anything less had a chance of getting stuck in the bone. But 10 ft-lbs is nothing.
The density of the bone had almost no effect either. They tested osteoporotic bones as well as normal ones.
This proves that a 22lr from any barrel has more then enough strength to pass through a femur and would not have any trouble passing through the weaker skull.
It seems that many people in this forum highly underestimate the power of their firearms.
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Good to see your done " Chillaxing" Lol!
Tell the truth. You don't chill. Ever.
I think you see those burn barrels jumping over fences, when you try to sleep, instead of sheep!![]()
You have to read the Motion for Post Conviction, it is explained in there.
In the motion, Zellner lays out her theory for how Avery was framed, with perhaps the biggest bombshell being a Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department report which documents Colborn discovering Halbachs car on November 3rd, 2005 two days before it was officially found in Averys Salvage Yard on November 5th. Zellner's motion contends that the car was moved on the evening of November 4th after law enforcement officers planted evidence inside the car.
"Ms. Halbachs vehicle was moved from the Fred Radandt Sons, Inc. quarry to the Avery property using the conveyor road that led onto the Avery property from the quarry," the motion states. "Mr. Avery contends that the blood evidence was planted in Ms. Halbachs car, by law enforcement, prior to the discovery of the vehicle on the Avery property on November 5, 2005."
"If the unidentified fingerprints on the victims vehicle match either Officer [Andrew] Colborn or Officer [James] Lenk, it would be significant evidence of their involvement in moving the victims vehicle onto the Avery property," Zellner told Newsweek.
The 45-page motion reveals other inconsistencies and falsehoods Zellner claims to have uncovered. The motion states that two non-law enforcement people who entered the Avery property when it was closed to the public after the murder both lied when interviewed by police. The first person is identified as Individual A and appears to be Joshua Radandt, who told police he saw a fire on the Avery property as he drove through his familys quarry to his deer camp the afternoon of October 31.
Zellner says in her motion that Individual A accessed the Avery property four times for unknown reasons after it was closed to the public and that it was impossible for Individual A to observe Mr. Averys backyard as he described because of the elevation of the quarry from where he was allegedly making his observations. The motion also calls out an Individual B, apparently Halbach ex-boyfriend Ryan Hillegas, who the motion says lied to police that the blinker light on Halbachs Toyota RAV4 had been broken for months.
Is that a different motion than this one? I forgot about the radiocarbon testing in this motion until I read the People article. I didn't know that radiocarbon testing is able to give as fine of a year range as needed in this case.
It looks like Zellner feels confident that LE took blood from Avery's previous case and planted it to gain a conviction in Teresa's murder. JMO
I'm trying to figure out why Teresa's ex would lie about the broken turn signal lamp.
If he was complicit in her murder and the broken light had something to do with it, why not say that he didn't know anything about it. Why lie?
Does this help??![]()
I'm trying to figure out why Teresa's ex would lie about the broken turn signal lamp.
If he was complicit in her murder and the broken light had something to do with it, why not say that he didn't know anything about it. Why lie?
I guess someone would have to ask him.
What about where Ms. Zellner mentioned that if Avery had a bleeding cut on his hand it was unheard of by scientists that his blood and TH's blood would not be found together in the back of the vehicle where he supposedly placed her. Only TH's blood in back of vehicle.