Yes I have many unanswered questions about suitcase man ... really wish the media had got all witness reported sightings correct so we could chronologically map out where and when he was seen.
and I think guilty conscience could be ruled out immediately.... also I don't think he committed the murder. These wreaks of a cover-up.
I know I am totally alone on this - I really don't think he wanted to be noticed. He chose the morning, I can't imagine a lot going on in the town at 7.30 - 8.00 am. His mistake was not knowing that two locals chose this time to do their "walk" at this time.
I'm sticking with the professional opinion of the forensic Criminologist who said the actions were indicative of someone simply wanting to distance themselves (Personally/location wise) from the suitcase as soon as possible and those actions also indicated the person would feel that no one would be able to feel they will be suspected of having this child anyway.
We know that the police suspect that the child did come from that immediate area...well that is what I think they are suggesting.
I can't figure out why exactly why the individual wouldn't think people wouldn't associate him with the child, but I have a few ideas.
He knew the child (possibly related) - but never had her stay with him at his residence for an extended period of time to be noticed, so his thought process is that locals wouldn't associate this child to him.???
He lived on one of the properties outside of the immediate town, this child had been at his property but would never have been seen by locals (the smaller tight knit community of houses).. There are no shops in the township apart from the post office...little angel could have been in a car seat and travelled down past the main street many of times without been noticed, as he/her mum/dad had business elsewhere...and no need to stop in at the post office...
The family that she was apart of always had a habit of being secretive and kept a boundary between themselves and other locals.
This morning I even wondered if this man was attempting to hide rather than dump..
This may explain him being sighted 44 days later ...was he going to retrieve the suitcase??
If he was - as suggested in the media seen hours apart walking along the hwy, could this suggest hesitation or even confusion??
Maybe he is covering for someone else (As the police suggested)
And the reason this disposal is so unusual to many other murder victims is .. ???
It could be for any reason - but specifically fear of the remains being found.
Relatives staying for an extended period of time.
Having to move for some reason.
Works being undertaken at his property; Telstra, water board, NBN...???.
Sale of home - property inspections.
Fear of being raided related to some other investigation - their involved in some criminal activity
Having strangers on property undertaking work for a specific reason; plumbing works, electrical, home renovation, extension, addition
some other maintenance requiring strangers to be on their property for extended period of time.
I am not surprised they are still pursing this mans identity - Your right the pieces don't really fit - but there has to be at least one eye witness report that is correct. Its a very small town
Im so tired....hope some of what I've typed makes sense..
otherwise...peace out fellow webleuthers xx