It’s doing my head in trying to work out what has happened to Gus. There’s not much to work with. We have
- No signs of him wandering
- No sign of an animal attack
- No evidence of foul play
- Family cooperating with police
- Zero to little chance of him being taken
- Not in the dam
A child can’t vanish!!!
Would the family cover up an accident such as Gus being run over? I’d say no.
If it was a different type of accident where someone in the family lost their temper and accidentally caused Gus’s death would they ALL agree to lie and cover manslaughter up?
Would they ALL be able to get their stories the same when questioned by police ? (They would be questioned individually and the same questions would be asked in different ways).
Would they ALL get the who went where answers the same if they were lying?
Who went in what direction in the car or on a bike looking for Gus? (I’m assuming someone did that )
What was everyone else doing while you were doing that? etc
Would the police tell the public if the families version of events showed they were lying or would the police just say no evidence of foul play?
Are the police waiting for someone to crack or come forward with information?
So many questions going round my head.
Hope this post doesn’t get deleted for being ot and I can get your opinions .