Australia AUSTRALIA - 4YO AUGUST (GUS) Missing from rural family home in Outback, Yunta, South Australia, 27th Sept 2025

  • #2,861
Hard to fathom how all these farm kids survive really , generation after generation :rolleyes:
We mostly all survived. As kids, we understood our boundaries from a very young age. We were taught about snakes etc. And by 10 we knew how to shoot a rifle and drive a vehicle. The best years of my life and we had very little in the way of toys. Pegs were more fun.
 
  • #2,862
  • #2,863
  • #2,864
I grew up on a farm back in the day no fence but we knew where we weren't allowed to go and just didn't go there . But just a different time and we knew if we heard marco we would yell polo . I feel for the family if he honestly just wandered off. But I can't figure this out there should of been just one
 
Last edited:
  • #2,865
The Mail is back - with a claim that Gus may not have been seen by outsiders since March when he went for an introduction day at the local school.

 
  • #2,866
The Mail is back - with a claim that Gus may not have been seen by outsiders since March when he went for an introduction day at the local school.


The link seems to be gone?

"Sorry, we can't find the page you are looking for. Would you like to go back to where you were, or search for it?"

Maybe the legal dept hasn't signed off on the article yet and they had to pull it down for a while.
Josh might be a bit upset if they are insinuating that he hasn't seen his son since March.

imo
 
Last edited:
  • #2,867
I wouldn't use the Daily Mail to line a cat tray. Its always been a disgusting rag.
 
  • #2,868
The link seems to be gone?

"Sorry, we can't find the page you are looking for. Would you like to go back to where you were, or search for it?"

Maybe the legal dept hasn't signed off on the article yet and they had to pull it down for a while.
Josh might be a bit upset if they are insinuating that he hasn't seen his son since March.

imo

The link works for me. Maybe it's blocked in Australia?

 
  • #2,869
The link works for me. Maybe it's blocked in Australia?


Must be geoblocked. I get the same message with the link you provided. On Google and Safari browsers here.

"Sorry, we can't find the page you are looking for. Would you like to go back to where you were, or search for it?"


Wonder why they would geoblock it here.
 
  • #2,870
There was no fence there near the homestead.

I’ve seen all of the photographs published in the media, and there is no fenced area nearby the homestead. IMO

There will be fencing in the paddocks, and probably around the perimeter of the station.


Imo


Google search: typical farm fence in South Australia.



View attachment 623806
A typical South Australian farm fence is a post-and-wire system, often using treated pine or steel post
It looks to me, using Google Maps satellite view, that there are fencelines around the homestead complex. That's not to say they don't have holes, or open gates, or aren't easily penetrable by a pedestrian. Oak Park Station · Grampus SA 5440, Australia
 
  • #2,871
The Daily Mail article claims that trial nursery day in March appears to be when the photo released of Gus was taken. And that as far as they can establish nobody outside of the immediate family has seen him since.

If this is true then that is very concerning.

Adding the link again to show source
 
  • #2,872
Geobocked? Interesting .....
Must be geoblocked. I get the same message with the link you provided. On Google and Safari browsers here.

"Sorry, we can't find the page you are looking for. Would you like to go back to where you were, or search for it?"


Wonder why they would geoblock it here.
I could paste the relevant sections but unfortunately that would amount to rather more than 10% of the article.

Basically they claim that:
  • Gus attended an introduction day at the local school in March with a school start day of (presumably this coming) January
  • The published photograph of him appears to have been taken at the introduction day
  • They have visited almost every property in Yunta to speak to residents about when Gus was last seen by outsiders.
"As far as we can establish, that nursery school visit also represents the last time anyone outside of the child’s immediate family can remember seeing him."

And:

"Put another way, the missing boy seems to have barely left his home in the six months leading up to the day he vanished. The only people who had seen him alive during that period were the ones who then reported him missing."

On a lighter note, they report that Josh's old band was called The Cut Snakes.

ETA: Link for completeness: Missing Outback boy trans gran greets Mail reporter with shotgun
 
  • #2,873
It’s doing my head in trying to work out what has happened to Gus. There’s not much to work with. We have
  • No signs of him wandering
  • No sign of an animal attack
  • No evidence of foul play
  • Family cooperating with police
  • Zero to little chance of him being taken
  • Not in the dam
A child can’t vanish!!!

Would the family cover up an accident such as Gus being run over? I’d say no.

If it was a different type of accident where someone in the family lost their temper and accidentally caused Gus’s death would they ALL agree to lie and cover manslaughter up?
Would they ALL be able to get their stories the same when questioned by police ? (They would be questioned individually and the same questions would be asked in different ways).
Would they ALL get the who went where answers the same if they were lying?
Who went in what direction in the car or on a bike looking for Gus? (I’m assuming someone did that )
What was everyone else doing while you were doing that? etc

Would the police tell the public if the families version of events showed they were lying or would the police just say no evidence of foul play?

Are the police waiting for someone to crack or come forward with information?

So many questions going round my head.
Hope this post doesn’t get deleted for being ot and I can get your opinions .

Its super frustrating isn't it @Lady-J

Whilst we're ticking away pages on WS, there is a task force of Police (Task Force Horizon) with reams of information, data, years of experience etc who are no doubt working diligently on trying to uncover what has happened to Gus.

Hopefully we'll get an answer sooner rather than later!
 
  • #2,874
As this saga drags on, I gotta tell ya, my spidey senses are growin'. I'm having difficulty rationalizing little Gus simply wandered off, in to a region he knew held potential danger, in particular, right before dinner time.

Yep, even at 4 years old, I opine, the little guy had likely heard stories of the bush, the poisonous snakes, the do's and don'ts, the chances of trouble if out there alone, folks who got lost, or died of thirst, or who knows what. Yeah, right before dinner time, right before dark, out in to the wilderness he goes?

I'm sorry, at this juncture, I ain't buyin' it anymore.
BBM. I was a wandering child, and that's just not how I thought. I remember the last time I wandered and got lost. I might have been about Gus's age. I didn't like being lost at all and I was resolved not to do it again. I was just going to walk along the beach, in a straight line of sight from the family. And then when I got where I was going I decided I was just going to walk away from the water towards the vegetation that mounted to cliffs, not leaving the beach, just to see what was up that track. Not possible to get lost doing that, of course. Well then the track looked so interesting, I was just going to walk to where it turned a corner and see what was around the corner. I was still within sight of the beach, I knew where I was. And so on. Until the time when I turned back and turned around a few times and had no idea. So I kept walking on, crying, until I encountered some people who intercepted me and took me back to the beach and found my parents . . . who hadn't missed me yet. And that was really the last time, until I was competent to wander without getting lost.
 
  • #2,875
The Daily Mail article claims that trial nursery day in March appears to be when the photo released of Gus was taken. And that as far as they can establish nobody outside of the immediate family has seen him since.

If this is true then that is very concerning.

Adding the link again to show source

If that was true, I think the police would not be saying that there was no sign of foul play.
If that was true, it would mean that Josh hadn't seen his son in 6 months. No indication of that from the friends of Josh that they spoke with.
I imagine the DM couldn't establish much because most people aren't talking to them.

imo
 
  • #2,876
If that was true, I think the police would not be saying that there was no sign of foul play.
If that was true, it would mean that Josh hadn't seen his son in 6 months. No indication of that from the friends of Josh that they spoke with.
I imagine the DM couldn't establish much because most people aren't talking to them.

imo

Wouldn't Josh would be classed as immediate family to Gus? That's what I took it to mean anyway.
 
  • #2,877
Wouldn't Josh would be classed as immediate family to Gus? That's what I took it to mean anyway.
Yes, he would, but the police seem satisfied that he was a good 100km away at the time Gus was reported to have gone missing.
 
  • #2,878
I can read this Daily Mail disrespectful garbage using Opera.

I've only recently installed it, had to look at the settings.
 
Last edited:
  • #2,879
If that was true, I think the police would not be saying that there was no sign of foul play.
"No sign of" is very neutral language and doesn't mean that there was no foul play.
If that was true, it would mean that Josh hadn't seen his son in 6 months. No indication of that from the friends of Josh that they spoke with.
There's still a lot of uncertainty about what actually happened at the homestead and on the station that day. In fact there seems to be so much contradiction that it feels as though we are being deliberately gaslit. Maybe that is the police's intention.
I imagine the DM couldn't establish much because most people aren't talking to them.

imo
Perhaps, but people change their minds. Maybe when Gus first went missing it looked just like any other missing kid in the outback. Sometimes those kids are found safe and sometimes their remains are found some time later. But when there is no trace at all of a child reported missing after 6 weeks, maybe people start to wonder if something was more wrong than they thought and become more willing to talk to reporters. Maybe.
 
  • #2,880
There is a user here who was a professional at observing footprints at these kinds of scenes. He has explained on WS how he could tell a lot from just one print about the person who made it. He once explained the typical behavior of people who become lost in wilderness, and he could examine terrain maps and come up with ideas of where to search. I am sure they used just such experts for Gus' case. ETA: And are probably right about the footprints found either being his or not.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
141
Guests online
794
Total visitors
935

Forum statistics

Threads
635,685
Messages
18,682,159
Members
243,352
Latest member
xkfunkx
Back
Top