Australia AUSTRALIA - 4YO AUGUST (GUS) Missing from rural family home in Outback, Yunta, South Australia, 27th Sept 2025

[Dotta]

I interpret the statement from Gus’ parents as targeting a specific person. In my opinion that person is most likely one of the grandparents.
I have bolded the emphasis I am referring to.

“We know someone out there may have information. If someone knows what happened, we are pleading with that person—or anyone who may have seen or heard anything—to please come forward. Even the smallest detail could give us the answers we so desperately need.”
I am wondering if the photo and video have been chosen because they have specific and maybe sentimental relevance to that person as well. Some questions I have been pondering are:

Who is Gus looking at in the dog in the car seat photo?
Is the dog special to someone?
Was there some personal significance to the balance bike video? (beyond the hat)
Were the days these images were captured significant to someone? Who was present?

View attachment 648610

https://www.police.sa.gov.au/sa-police-news-assets/front-page-news/gus-lamont-parents-appeal-for-information

There seems to be a big time gap between the photo and video
judging by the length of boy's hair, no?

The hat is really distinctive.
The colour, felt material and black ribbon.

Gus looked quite striking wearing it.
Like a little gnome from a fairytale.

JMO

 

[imstilla.grandma]

We are united in our grief, and we are united in our search for answers about what happened to our little boy, Gus, who means everything to us. Our lives have been shattered, and every moment without him is unbearable. We know someone out there may have information. If someone knows what happened, we are pleading with that person—or anyone who may have seen or heard anything—to please come forward. Even the smallest detail could give us the answers we so desperately need.

“We also want to express our deepest gratitude to everyone involved in the search for Gus. The tireless efforts of police, emergency services, ADF personnel, volunteers, and specialists have meant more to us than we can ever say. To the friends, family and supporters who have shown such compassion, concern, and assistance during this heartbreaking time: thank you. Your kindness has helped carry us through the darkest days of our lives.

“All we want is to bring Gus home and understand what happened to our beautiful boy”.

https://www.police.sa.gov.au/sa-police-news-assets/front-page-news/gus-lamont-parents-appeal-for-information

 

[gerardo20]

I interpret the statement from Gus’ parents as targeting a specific person. In my opinion that person is most likely one of the grandparents.
I have bolded the emphasis I am referring to.

“We know someone out there may have information. If someone knows what happened, we are pleading with that person—or anyone who may have seen or heard anything—to please come forward. Even the smallest detail could give us the answers we so desperately need.”
I am wondering if the photo and video have been chosen because they have specific and maybe sentimental relevance to that person as well.

imo jmo moo omo This was also my feeling when I read this, precisely because of the words in bold. imo jmo moo omo While the wording could be read as directed in general, the message comes across as directed personally to that person who knows what happened.

imo jmo moo omo There was a lot of sentimental reaction to the video, and the photo with the dog would also have much sentimental weight with memories of Gus with the dog, etc for anyone close to Gus. imo jmo moo omo
imo jmo moo omo The statement makes it clear that neither Josh nor Jess are colluding with anyone withholding information.
imo jmo moo omo That person who knows what happened and is keeping it from Jess and Josh and the world can now be sure of the pain this is causing and that Gus's parents do not agree with withholding information to aid and abett anyone involved in the disappearance. imo jmo moo omo

 

[JLZ]

imo jmo moo omo This was also my feeling when I read this, precisely because of the words in bold. imo jmo moo omo While the wording could be read as directed in general, the message comes across as directed personally to that person who knows what happened.

imo jmo moo omo There was a lot of sentimental reaction to the video, and the photo with the dog would also have much sentimental weight with memories of Gus with the dog, etc for anyone close to Gus. imo jmo moo omo
imo jmo moo omo The statement makes it clear that neither Josh nor Jess are colluding with anyone withholding information.
imo jmo moo omo That person who knows what happened and is keeping it from Jess and Josh and the world can now be sure of the pain this is causing and that Gus's parents do not agree with withholding information to aid and abett anyone involved in the disappearance. imo jmo moo omo

To say that you know something may be the case, is more or less to say that you don't know whether it is the case or not. The statement is talking about possibilities. There is no declaration that J & J even believe that there is such a person who either knows what happened or witnessed some small detail of relevance. (I agree with this though: "The statement makes it clear that neither Josh nor Jess are colluding with anyone withholding information.")

 

[Morequestionsthananswers]

Imo the message, photo and video of Gus on his little bike is directed to the grandparents.

Gus was in Shannon’s care September 27 therefore she would know what happened.
MOO.

Josie would also know what happened and more than likely decided a cover up was necessary to save Jess from seeing a horrific sight and to save Shannon from going to jail.

My feeling is that something terrible happened in Shannon’s care and they both panicked and decided to cover it up. Then there was no going back.
MOO

The most likely explanation is Shannon became overwhelmed with the kids and lashed out accidentally causing grievous bodily harm and it was very bad. So bad it had to be hidden.
Moo

 

[Sillybilly]

ADMIN NOTE:

It seems necessary to make something very clear. Discussing or challenging moderation on the public thread is an automatic time out. Members are not Moderators, let alone trained Moderators. Members do not hold all the answers as to why some posts remain and others are removed. Moderators are actually selected on their ability to be able to set aside any personal biases when they are moderating any post.

When we receive a Report, we don't jump to act on the Report or the reporting member's claims or wishes for action. So if your post is removed, it isn't because Johnny just doesn't like you or what you have to say, or whose side you think we're on.

We don't live under a rock and are very aware of thread dynamics. We know the issues, we know the various "sides" and who doesn't like who, or whatever. If we don't already know the dynamics, we review it, and reviewing is not just a matter of reading the post that is alerted on; we go backward to review how the post happened, if there is any actual violation of TOS, is a post accusatory toward an innocent person, is it inflammatory or antagonistic, and on and on and on.

We don't see an alert and go "Poof".

So please stop trying to explain moderation when you are not a Moderator.

Thank you.

 

[Morequestionsthananswers]

I interpret the statement from Gus’ parents as targeting a specific person. In my opinion that person is most likely one of the grandparents.
I have bolded the emphasis I am referring to.

“We know someone out there may have information. If someone knows what happened, we are pleading with that person—or anyone who may have seen or heard anything—to please come forward. Even the smallest detail could give us the answers we so desperately need.”
I am wondering if the photo and video have been chosen because they have specific and maybe sentimental relevance to that person as well. Some questions I have been pondering are:

Who is Gus looking at in the dog in the car seat photo?
Is the dog special to someone?
Was there some personal significance to the balance bike video? (beyond the hat)
Were the days these images were captured significant to someone? Who was present?

View attachment 648610

https://www.police.sa.gov.au/sa-police-news-assets/front-page-news/gus-lamont-parents-appeal-for-information

Imo
The dog looks like one of Shannon and Josie’s.

IMO I doubt the grandparents can confess because they are covering up something that’s going to get them both put in jail.

 

[Lemony]

Imo
The dog looks like one of Shannon and Josie’s.

IMO I doubt the grandparents can confess because they are covering up something that’s going to get them both put in jail.
View attachment 648686

If one or both are involved, carrying guilt or withholding information could become overwhelming, even if the consequence is jail time. Then there is the ongoing pressure of a major crime investigation, repeated searches, public scrutiny, media attention. That kind of strain can be hard for some to endure. It may get to a point where confessing is the preferred option.

 

[Morequestionsthananswers]

If one or both are involved, carrying guilt or withholding information could become overwhelming, even if the consequence is jail time. Then there is the ongoing pressure of a major crime investigation, repeated searches, public scrutiny, media attention. That kind of strain can be hard for some to endure. It may get to a point where confessing is the preferred option.

If one or both are involved,no amount of stoicism is going to take away what’s happened. Hope the scrutiny etc gets too much and there’s a confession. The guilt must be horrendous.

 

[gerardo20]

There is no declaration that J & J even believe that there is such a person who either knows what happened or witnessed some small detail of relevance

imo jmo moo omo
Shannon has told police she knows what happened.... that Gus was somewhere at a particular time and then he went missing (according to Shannon.)
imo jmo moo omo

Gus was in Shannon’s care September 27 therefore she would know what happened.
MOO.

imo jmo moo omo
But police have effectively said this cannot be true, because out of three possibilities, two have been ruled out, (wandering off and getting lost OR being abducted by a person unknown).

imo jmo moo omo
These seem to be the only possibilities consistent with believing what Shannon has said happened.
imo jmo moo omo
imo jmo moo omo
So effectively the police are saying that what Shannon says happened is not what happened.
imo jmo moo omo
Police are implying Gus did not wander off and get lost on his own, someone was involved in his dissappearance.
imo jmo moo omo
Shannon may or may not know what happened to Gus, but police were given the impression he dissappeared on his own and they now do not believe that.
imo jmo moo omo

Read in this context, the appeal from Josh and Jess to whoever may know anything about what happened must take on a particular relevance for Shannon as the one person who has told police they knew something about what happened.
imo jmo moo omo

 

[jepop]

I interpret the statement from Gus’ parents as targeting a specific person. In my opinion that person is most likely one of the grandparents.
I have bolded the emphasis I am referring to.

“We know someone out there may have information. If someone knows what happened, we are pleading with that person—or anyone who may have seen or heard anything—to please come forward. Even the smallest detail could give us the answers we so desperately need.”
I am wondering if the photo and video have been chosen because they have specific and maybe sentimental relevance to that person as well. Some questions I have been pondering are:

Who is Gus looking at in the dog in the car seat photo?
Is the dog special to someone?
Was there some personal significance to the balance bike video? (beyond the hat)
Were the days these images were captured significant to someone? Who was present?

View attachment 648610

https://www.police.sa.gov.au/sa-police-news-assets/front-page-news/gus-lamont-parents-appeal-for-information

To me it looks like the sweet bike video was taken in the driveway leading up to Oak Park homestead. Could be this photo was also taken when mum and kids were living there. Jmo

 

[FromGermany1]

What, if the dogs (IMO there were at least 4 and probably unleashed) did something horrible to little Gus?

What, if a dog (the main attacker) is also missing since then and nobody noticed it?

Little Gus on the pic doesn't look as if the dog would be his best friend ...... Maybe, it was chosen with intent by the parents.

MOO and speculation

 

[_sleuthdog_]

What, if the dogs (IMO there were at least 4 and probably unleashed) did something horrible to little Gus?

What, if a dog (the main attacker) is also missing since then and nobody noticed it?

Little Gus on the pic doesn't look as if the dog would be his best friend ......

MOO and speculation

I don’t think its fair to assume just from this picture that there is any issue between Gus and this dog. To me it is a sweet moment captured of Gus and the dog. Also, a lot of people own dogs - so it could be one from the station but my guess is it is a dog belonging to Jess/Josh, like one of the dogs mentioned previously that has been witnessed being walked by Josh, Jess and family in Adelaide. JMO.


Edit - I’ll also add that Kelpies are amazing dogs and aren’t known to be vicious and generally great with kids (having also had one myself)

 

[FromGermany1]

I don’t think its fair to assume just from this picture that there is any issue between Gus and this dog. To me it is a sweet moment captured of Gus and the dog. Also, a lot of people own dogs - so it could be one from the station but my guess is it is a dog belonging to Jess/Josh, like one of the dogs mentioned previously that has been witnessed being walked by Josh, Jess and family in Adelaide. JMO.


Edit - I’ll also add that Kelpies are amazing dogs and aren’t known to be vicious and generally great with kids (having also had one myself)

It happens from time to time, that dogs attack people. A friend's daughter can no longer use her right arm since she was attacked by her own beloved dog.

 

[_sleuthdog_]

Yep, fair enough. Just don’t see that just from this one image though. IMO.

 

[FromGermany1]

Yep, fair enough. Just don’t see that just from this one image though. IMO.

Of course not because of the image, but we all are searching for a reason, what fGs could have happened. What was being covered up and why?

 

[AmoryK]

I thought of the dog attack possibility but dismissed it largely because I assumed there’d have been evidence of that - ie bloodstains, disturbance in the area, etc.

 

[Ruminations]

Of course not because of the image, but we all are searching for a reason, what fGs could have happened. What was being covered up and why?

Any kind of animal attack would leave evidence. There would be a struggle, hair, blood that I think would at the very least leave an obviously cleaned up area by the time LE arrived.

And that is aside from how unlikely it is that this would be kept a secret from one another and LE.

I can't imagine one grandparent would tell another, don't tell Mummy, but Fido killed her baby. Now, help me get ready for the police.

MOO

 

[Dotta]

Behind Paywall

Can somebody summarize?

"Powerful hidden message in Gus Lamont's parents' statement:

Their agony is clear
- but something else is being said here."

https://twitter.com/x/status/2027364909957185831

 

[Dotta]

Behind Paywall

Can somebody summarize?

"Powerful hidden message in Gus Lamont's parents' statement:

Their agony is clear
- but something else is being said here."

https://twitter.com/x/status/2027364909957185831

OK
I'm replaying to myself.

It is suggested
that Jess & JL although separated,
are strongly united in their support of Task Horizon Investigators
while
2 other family members stopped cooperating with Police.

Strong divide within family is suggested.

And just summary of the whole case.

JMO