It seems surprising that no local news outlet is reporting anything even if there's nothing new to report. Also, with the passage of time, I find it strange that there's been a suspect declared but nothing has followed. Can the suspect have this status indefinitely? Perhaps for years? Living under the cloud that LE suspects them of being involved but can't find enough evidence to charge them? Can anyone shed any light on this?
MOO.
The police have narrowed the suspect down basically to be one of two people, which to me is flying pretty close to the wind in terms of defamation if those two people are innocent.
This is what happened in another case when a policeman said they had their prime and only suspect and named him as Lloyd Rayney.
Rayney's wife, Corryn, was murdered in August 2007. In the following month, Rayney was publicly named by police as "the prime and only suspect", though he was not charged with the murder until December 2010, more than three years after the event
In 2017, he succeeded in a defamation action against the State of Western Australia over police behaviour and was awarded a record sum of $A2.62 million.
Barrister awarded one of the largest defamation payouts in Australian history after being named in Corryn Rayney murder investigation
www.theguardian.com
In 2022 Lloyd Rayney won a $350,000 defamation payout, plus interest, for comments made by a forensic investigator which he claimed suggested he "murdered his wife and got away with it".
Former Perth barrister Lloyd Rayney wins a $350,000 defamation payout, plus interest, for comments made by a forensic investigator which he claimed suggested he "murdered his wife and got away with it".
www.abc.net.au
No one has ever been found guilty of Mrs Rayney's murder and I have a feeling the same thing will happen in this case of poor little Gus. I suppose the only way for Shannon and Josie to prove their innocence is for Gus's remains to be found and it can be proved they had nothing to do with the matter. What does anyone else think about that?