• #5,361
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,362
Thanks, unfortunately it's paywalled.

Ahh sorry, I should have said, but I can vouch that it was taken from the article.
 
  • #5,363
  • #5,364
Ahh sorry, I should have said, but I can vouch that it was taken from the article.
Thanks @Marg944, I don't doubt it was taken from the article. What it means is open to interpretation though and context (within the article) may help with that.

I could pose all sorts of questions and go down a DM parsing rabbit hole speculating what a context-less quote might signify about JM but no time for it. Will only note by Oct 10th the search was deemed a recovery operation on OaK Park and being dealt with by Police and Task Force professionals. It's not clear what help a daily mail reporter or paper could offer that would be of any value to that. If I had to guess without context, JM is refusing the DM's help not help in general and not the help of professionals and the police. And I'll leave it there. Jmo of course.

ETA I believe Police returned to Oak Park a few days after this report was published to carry out a second intensive foot search, expanding out the perimeter to approx 5.5km (which in the Feb 5 presser was said to cover 94 square KMS)

DM article was 10th Oct, Expanded foot search Oct 14th to 16th.

 
Last edited:

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
88
Guests online
3,116
Total visitors
3,204

Forum statistics

Threads
643,401
Messages
18,798,360
Members
245,140
Latest member
eviewhite
Top