• #5,361
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,362
Thanks, unfortunately it's paywalled.

Ahh sorry, I should have said, but I can vouch that it was taken from the article.
 
  • #5,363
  • #5,364
Ahh sorry, I should have said, but I can vouch that it was taken from the article.
Thanks @Marg944, I don't doubt it was taken from the article. What it means is open to interpretation though and context (within the article) may help with that.

I could pose all sorts of questions and go down a DM parsing rabbit hole speculating what a context-less quote might signify about JM but no time for it. Will only note by Oct 10th the search was deemed a recovery operation on OaK Park and being dealt with by Police and Task Force professionals. It's not clear what help a daily mail reporter or paper could offer that would be of any value to that. If I had to guess without context, JM is refusing the DM's help not help in general and not the help of professionals and the police. And I'll leave it there. Jmo of course.

ETA I believe Police returned to Oak Park a few days after this report was published to carry out a second intensive foot search, expanding out the perimeter to approx 5.5km (which in the Feb 5 presser was said to cover 94 square KMS)

DM article was 10th Oct, Expanded foot search Oct 14th to 16th.

 
Last edited:
  • #5,365
  • #5,366
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,367
The “very private”” family mentioned back in early October is mentioned again in this recent article.



Police have said the family is “very private”, people who, according to Superintendent Mark Syrus, “like the isolation” of their rural homestead life.

They’re a very private family, and they don’t get many visitors up here,” he said on October 1.

“It’s very tough for them. They like the isolation, and over the last six days, they’ve had over 100 people in the area being part of their lives.

“We gave them space because that’s what they needed, just a bit of time to rationalise what has happened and to come to terms with it.”





 
  • #5,368
<snipped for focus>

Police have said the family is “very private” [..........]

“We gave them space because that’s what they needed, just a bit of time to rationalise what has happened and to come to terms with it.”






I'm a little tweaked by the quote being that the family has to rationalize and come to terms with what has happened, rather than rationalize and come to terms with what is unknown.

MOO
 
  • #5,369
It just occurred to me that maybe any body was moved more than once. For example, an initial place close by, then removal further afield (outside search area and/or Oak Park, and possibly again as a final place after consideration or simply to further conceal it after being privy to police ideas and plans.

Just speculation. JMO.
 
  • #5,370


Perhaps what Mark Aldridge said about access to an area being blocked is true.

It possibly could be the reason why there are now two uncooperative family members 🤔
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
201
Guests online
3,243
Total visitors
3,444

Forum statistics

Threads
643,460
Messages
18,799,127
Members
245,154
Latest member
Chelseabaffa90
Top