Australia - Family of four dead plus pets in murder suicide, Mosman Park, WA, 30 Jan 2026

iamshadow21

Amateur Forensics Geek
Websleuths Guardian
Joined
Oct 8, 2022
Messages
12,708
Reaction score
125,432
  • #1
  • #2
Why kill the pets? 😢
 
  • #3
Moo...so if there was no violence it would be carbon monoxide or poison/of I guess
 
  • #4
Moo...so if there was no violence it would be carbon monoxide or poison/of I guess
That was my assumption too.
 
  • #5
Why kill the pets? 😢
Why does a family annihilator do anything? Some of these people do that. Xavier Dupont de Ligonnès killed the dogs, too.

Apparently there was a note.

MOO
 
  • #6
Yes he did. It just makes it even sadder.
As for why? I'm going to purely speculate and say it sounds like the children had complex needs and there may have been financial difficulties. The strain probably took its toll. There's always alternatives. These are the actions of a desperate person.
 
  • #7
  • #8
Just putting this here for balance, with the caveat that we have no idea at this time whether the health or disability of the children was even actually a factor in their murder.



MOO
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Terrible and literally close to home for me (TBC I don't know the victims but live 20 minutes away ). It's always extra shocking and in this case, extremely sad when tragedies such as murders/murder-suicides happen in the area where you live.

At this point, all I can say is I'm thankful none suffered from violence although the instigator moo had a choice and murder is never, ever okay. If you must, please just take your own life but leave your children (and spouse unless a pact) alone...they have a right to live. Moo
 
  • #10
Terrible and literally close to home for me (TBC I don't know the victims but live 20 minutes away ). It's always extra shocking and in this case, extremely sad when tragedies such as murders/murder-suicides happen in the area where you live.

At this point, all I can say is I'm thankful none suffered from violence although the instigator moo had a choice and murder is never, ever okay. If you must, please just take your own life but leave your children (and spouse unless a pact) alone...they have a right to live. Moo
Murder is always an act of violence; the body fights to survive, feels pain and struggles to breathe, even with overdose or asphyxia. Nobody gets a pass just because they left their victim a good looking corpse not requiring spackle at the funeral home. What was done here was every bit a violation as if the murderer had used a weapon like a knife or a gun.

The killer took away their lives and futures. That's the same however they did it, and however they justified it in whatever lies they wrote.

MOO
 
  • #11
Murder is always an act of violence; the body fights to survive, feels pain and struggles to breathe, even with overdose or asphyxia. Nobody gets a pass just because they left their victim a good looking corpse not requiring spackle at the funeral home. What was done here was every bit a violation as if the murderer had used a weapon like a knife or a gun.

The killer took away their lives and futures. That's the same however they did it, and however they justified it in whatever lies they wrote.

MOO
Of course I agree murder is wrong, period. I'll rephrase, yes asphyxiation ( (if that is what happened here, say via carbon monoxide for eg ) is a violence perpetrated on the victim. I guess all I'm saying is that if it came down to (for eg) drugging the victims and then asphyxiation whilst unconscious vs a vicious stabbing (for eg) where the victims experienced conscious terror, pain and realisation, then I would feel some relief that the latter did not occur. I think this is the message the police are actually communicating when they say no violence, though we shall wait and see ofcourse. Jmo
 
  • #12
Of course I agree murder is wrong, period. I'll rephrase, yes asphyxiation ( (if that is what happened here, say via carbon monoxide for eg ) is a violence perpetrated on the victim. I guess all I'm staying is that if it came down to (for eg) drugging the victims and then asphixiating whilst unconscious vs a vicious stabbing (for eg) where the victims experienced conscious terror, pain and realisation, then I would feel some relief that the latter did not occur. I think this is the message the police are actually communicating when they say no violence, though we shall wait and see ofcourse. Jmo
You're probably right, but there is just such a history of minimising in the media when disabled kids are murdered. As though it's acceptable somehow because they were disabled, especially if they were murdered 'gently'.

People tend to focus on disabled as excuse, and not on murdered children. Children who had just as much right to exist in murdered as any other child.

MOO
 
  • #13
You're probably right, but there is just such a history of minimising in the media when disabled kids are murdered. As though it's acceptable somehow because they were disabled, especially if they were murdered 'gently'.

People tend to focus on disabled as excuse, and not on murdered children. Children who had just as much right to exist in murdered as any other child.

MOO
It is wrong to murder your children period, disabled or not.

Your might well be right, the fact the media is already reporting that the children had "health issues" might be the beginning of a minimisation. I find the murder of children by their parents)trusted caregiver especially heinous. I just wanted to make sure my OP made that clear ( if you must suicide, leave your kids alone! A selfish and terrible act of betrayal). If not, I hope this clarifies. Moo
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
67
Guests online
1,785
Total visitors
1,852

Forum statistics

Threads
639,032
Messages
18,737,075
Members
244,586
Latest member
mhen0322
Back
Top