Australia Australia - Janine Vaughan, 31, Bathurst, NSW, 7 Dec 2001

  • #461
Ok I have the 9 Now page up.

My TV used to have reception but now I just get pixels on all the Nine channels.
I might try scanning the channels in again. But not right now.
 
  • #462
Nice to meet you, Loxoli !

You too, Toots! I’m a bit more of a lurker but I hang around the same threads as you and a few other Aussie regulars.
 
  • #463
I'm a lurker quite a lot of the time, but like to "like" posts to support the lovely and interesting posters here.

I actually used to just read the posts here, until the Allison Baden Clay case. I guess you could say I joined for Allison.

You too, Toots! I’m a bit more of a lurker but I hang around the same threads as you and a few other Aussie regulars.
 
  • #464
I'm a lurker quite a lot of the time, but like to "like" posts to support the lovely and interesting posters here.

I actually used to just read the posts here, until the Allison Baden Clay case. I guess you could say I joined for Allison.
I think a lot of us joined for Allison, I did too :)

Us Aussie's are a great bunch
 
  • #465
  • #466
I followed the news and Baden-Clay trial, but I joined WS a couple of years ago for William. Still here for William, Janine, Marion Barter, Russell & Carol- the list is ever growing. I wish I had more time to spend on these cases and I guess all the 703 people that are currently on the AFP Missing Persons register :(
 
  • #467
All those missing people have to be somewhere and someone must know something.

I'm hoping the new DNA unit will solve some of them.
 
  • #468
All those missing people have to be somewhere and someone must know something.

I'm hoping the new DNA unit will solve some of them.

Fingers crossed!
 
  • #469
  • #470
Wow so many ads.
 
  • #471
  • #472
Doesn't he look well :)
 
  • #473
Yep Gary looks well, shame William T inquest is still not on as I could chat to him & pick his brain :(

AJ is still my main suspect............
 
  • #474
There was nothing new it that for us.

Where are you Janine???

It's been way to long, someone, for gods sake speak up & stop this families torment.

Thinking of you Kylie, Adam, Rod , Ian & all of Janine's family & friends , I know you will never give up looking for Janine!

:angry:
 
  • #475
Yep Gary looks well, shame William T inquest is still not on as I could chat to him & pick his brain :(

AJ is still my main suspect............

Jubes says AJ puts up red flags.

Lived in two places - school, and apartment in town - why
Two week interview - all was good
Four week interview - refused DNA swab, photo, car search
Couldn't remember what he did the day after Janine disappeared

Pastor says he can be an awkward man, but that doesn't mean anything. Pastor did not say "I know him, he would never do this"

(I am still ½ an hour behind)
 
  • #476
I thought it was a very disappointing episode.
Though I guess if there isn't anything new to report, there's not much they can do.

I imagine only those who haven't been following would find it interesting.
 
  • #477
Yep Gary looks well, shame William T inquest is still not on as I could chat to him & pick his brain :(

AJ is still my main suspect............

Spoiler alert if you haven’t watched the show.

I found it interesting that Jubelin and Nick Kaldas seemed to think that AJ was top of the list also. As SA said, Jubelin supported his suspicions by reminding us that AJ didn’t consent to his DNA or photo being taken or to his car being searched. Do we know if AJ ever provided a DNA sample at any point?

Another thing that stood out to me was the discussion about the length of time between the car pulling up and Janine entering. I thought Mal Pollard said 25-27 seconds, but then it sounded like Liz Hayes said more than 20 seconds. So she didn’t enter the car immediately after it pulled over and had time to have a conversation with the driver first. That’s interesting.

It’s a shame that the show didn’t include any of Janine’s family. It’s possible that they could have a contract with The Australian which prevents them from speaking to other media companies, IMO.
 
  • #478
Spoiler alert if you haven’t watched the show.

Jubelin and Nick Kaldas seemed to think that AJ was top of the list also. Jubelin supported his suspicions by reminding us that AJ didn’t consent to his DNA or photo being taken or to his car being searched. Do we know if AJ ever provided a DNA sample at any point?

Another thing that stood out to me was the discussion about the length of time between the car pulling up and Janine entering. I thought Mal Pollard said 25-27 seconds, but then it sounded like Liz Hayes said more than 20 seconds. So she didn’t enter the car immediately after it pulled over and had time to have a conversation with the driver first. That’s interesting.

It’s a shame that the show didn’t include any of Janine’s family. It’s possible that they could have a contract with The Australian which prevents them from speaking to other media companies, IMO.

Janine's family didn't want to take part, they have been making their own documentary for the past two years.
 
  • #479
I thought it was a very disappointing episode.
Though I guess if there isn't anything new to report, there's not much they can do.

I imagine only those who haven't been following would find it interesting.

Yeah at least it gets her name out there again. Nothing new to anyone who listened to the podcast really or who have followed the case.

I want the darn DNA results!!!
 
  • #480
Janine's family didn't want to take part, they have been making their own documentary for the past two years.

Ok, that makes sense then. I would love to see their documentary when it’s done.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
118
Guests online
1,415
Total visitors
1,533

Forum statistics

Threads
632,316
Messages
18,624,606
Members
243,083
Latest member
100summers
Back
Top