Could someone who has the information at their fingertips tell me the dates the caveat over the Oakley Drive property came into force and when it was removed, please?
The sticking point for me with Karen's disappearance being voluntary, in any way, is that she would have given up her future. Her future as a mother, and mother-in-law, and grandmother. Divorces can be had, so can bankruptcies, stepsons can be challenged or ignored. But to give up on her offspring is really difficult for me to fathom.
On top of those thoughts, I also question why she would slip away and do whatever voluntary action she may have taken after a heated argument? Why not slip away during lunch break at work, or after work, or when she was going shopping?
Surely an argument does not trigger an immediate response such as going into hiding or ending your life? ... which could lead to you being discovered before you have achieved your aim.
If the family is complicit, we don't really know when Karen disappeared, or whether there was an argument; or whether, if there was an argument, it happened immediately before her exit. Perhaps the described argument happened on another occasion when Karen walked out to cool down. It's sometimes easier to maintain a consistent lie if it's based on truth but translated in time.I too find it hard to believe that a meticulously planned "new start" would happen just after a heated argument.
I too find it hard to believe that a meticulously planned "new start" would happen just after a heated argument.
If the family is complicit, we don't really know when Karen disappeared, or whether there was an argument; or whether, if there was an argument, it happened immediately before her exit. Perhaps the described argument happened on another occasion when Karen walked out to cool down. It's sometimes easier to maintain a consistent lie if it's based on truth but translated in time.
In keeping an open mind and not ruling out anything.
A question which i think everyone would like to know the answer is:
Who\When (Before Borce) was the last person\s and at what time, to see Karen?
It's good to see WBsers looking in different directions as there's no new information to hand.
Looking at the information we have and with more members expressing their views, may bring
something up not previously considered.
There is one angle we haven't considered.
You don"t know me!!
You can look up and purchase the details at the link below. If you do intend purchasing the document, IMO it would not be appropriate to post the details here, but check with a mod anyway.
https://www.landata.vic.gov.au/tpc_menu.aspx
You don"t know me!!
I think that is important info they have that they haven't released and why? In other cases the last independent witnesses are generally revealed. Does this mean they are satisfied Karen was alive and well close to 10am on June 29th and at home? Digital footprint, a phone call from her home phone, someone else aside from Borce saw her there?
I don't think she planned to disappear - until 10 days before she did.
The Stranger theory is one line of inquiry i dont think the police can rule out at all.
As puggle stated there has been quite a few incidents In Melbourne's North but not confined to that area entirely.
There more sickos out there than there used to be, i wonder if are there enough resources to effectively monitor.
Im still considering the possible scenario that Karen may have met with foul play on the walking track.
<Snipped for brevity>.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.